Well... aside from the question if this was possible and there for feasible... I was puzzled by the reactions of all the surrounding characters. Seriously, a woman calls, tells you how to do your job and just her telling you, no there are no cameras makes you trust her?? What kind of cop is that / does that? Yeah, right, then you go and try to take her in and while she seems to turn everyone unconscious, you go: well, it's a hot chick and she does interesting stuff, why not accompany her? Oh, well, yes, please, drive my car, and I have no reason to protest any further while you wreck about two dozen cars and injure who knows how many people in the process.
And the professor? Suuure, while you initially suspect Lucy's call to be a prank, just her wiggling some technical devices turns you into a believer?
Though I don't really see the religious component of which some reviewers were speaking. But the philosophical potential suffers greatly under those poorly developed supporting characters... and being force feed all those bits and pieces ... I mean, all was well, as long as Lucy shut up - her explaining was just too much, while the end felt more as if it was just about visual effects.
PS: the trakt summary is just hilarious. So minimalistic, ignoring the main points and yet right on the spot.
I liked it.
It's a fun movie, it doesn't make any sense, but fun nonetheless.
Great movie till Lucy reaches 60%.
If you liked this movie, you know you need education.
During the opening twenty minutes or so, I could feel the Saturday afternoon matinee attendees squirming in their seats over the collective strangeness of "Lucy". All of those interspersed shots of cheetahs pursuing gazelles with a drug deal wasn't exactly difficult to pick up on, but I could tell the people in the theater weren't expecting such an oddity. I'm not a movie snob, but I was having as good of a time seeing the reactions of the crowd as I was watching the movie.
"Lucy" was always entertaining despite the fact that the whole premise of using on 10, 20, 50 or 100% of your brain is ridiculous. Scarlett Johansson was terrific (my crush grows), Amr Waked was a great sidekick and the car chase kicked my ass.
This has many breathtaking visuals and some brutal violence but "Lucy" is strange in many wonderful ways. It's good to see that something a little different, something not a sequel or a comic book adaptation, did well at the box office.
Extreme ScienceFiction. Starts with action (fiction) and ends with bizarre philosophy (pseudoscience). Scarlett Johanssson is a great action hero. Morgan Freeman brings narrative and humanity. The ending is meant to be a supreme intelle-gasm. The cerebral imaginings will captivate some but lose most. I give it a 7 (good attempt) out of 10. Special effects are epic though.
The entire concept of this movie is completely ridiculous. How would reaching 100% of your brain's potential give you god-like powers and turn you into pure energy? It doesn't make any sense.
In my opinion Limitless explored this same theory in a much better way.
Sure, Lucy is a pretty stupid movie, especially since it's a movie about intelligence, but that does not mean it's not entertaining. That it looks gorgeous and sounds amazing, help the enjoyment as well. If you let the analyzing part of your brain rest, and just enjoy the exciting, visual spectacle, I'm pretty sure most will enjoy Lucy as well.
Entertaining movie, but man is it stupid
"Lucy" was always entertaining despite the fact that the whole premise of using on 10, 20, 50 or 100% of your brain is ridiculous. Scarlett Johansson was terrific, Amr Waked was a fine sidekick.
This has good visuals and some brutal violence. "Lucy" is strange in many ways. It's always good to watch something a little different, something that's not a sequel or a comic book adaptation.
I have never been more disappointed.
Plot-holes and illogical decisions bug the entire experience and plot itself is not that good to begin with.
2 words : wasted potential!!!
I'd expected more, but it was entertaining enough to make up for the overuse of CGI and the mediocre ending. I liked the idea but it could probably have been done a lot better.
If you're a fan of Luc Besson's other work then you'll enjoy this movie once you stop letting the "We only use 10% of our brains" myth stop bothering you.
Most of the movie makes no sense and is far fetched but I think its still a fun movie to watch the last half wasn't as good but still a decent movie.
Scarlett played the emotionless self well, and the movie itself is a bit of a tribute to "2001 A Space Odyssey" probably. ;)
The 100% scene just made me really want to go rewatch Mob Psycho 100
The ending could have been better
Terrible documentary....oh wait, it was fiction, was fun, made me think about how society isn't capable of using such knowledge.
I just love this movie. It is completely flawed from the get go based on the still present misconception that humans only use 10% of their brain despite evidence to the contrary for decades. Yet the art used to tell the story is truly wonderful. Maybe it is because Luc Besson has far more talent in artistic storytelling than so many other directors that the plot holes and other faults are not even really relevant. This is artistic science fiction (actually more sci-fi than science fiction) and is absolutely wonderful.
Rewatch after 6 years...
After seeing this in the cinema - where I thought it was utterly crap - I have reevaluate it.
Besson is a really strange guy. He's like Philip K. Dick. Yet because he visually creates his ideas of science fiction, they are denigrated much more than they would be in written word. A result of the visual medium not being up to the task of creating his visions, no doubt.
Anyway... On rewatch, it is better than I recalled. It could have benefited from a grander scope. 20 more minutes runtime exploring some of the changes going on. And better CG.
Though thought provoking, and reaching further than Limitless, it doesn't stand up much to scrutiny and it is limp in its short 81 minutes of actual film.
Worth a watch on the small screen despite its flaws.
6.75/10
steal the limitless concept and make it garbage...
Great scifi. Very interesting plot with great visuals and a very slick ending. Thoroughly enjoyed it.
Ooooooooo lucyyyy..sooooooooooooooo hottt...want to touch thee hineeeyyyyy
I can't get enough of this movie! The questions raised and all the knowledge being the most important thing is amazing. She saying that "we never really die" and explaining about how the humanity created numbers and letters to kind of "adapt" everything to our size was pretty great. Scarlet's performance, the soundtrack and the visual effects are just a show aside for me. I'm sad that most of people actually didn't like the movie.
This movie was fantastic. I feel like it's getting hated on by people only because other people started hating on it. It was a very enjoyable movie, as long as you take into account that it's science fiction.
Waste of Time. The story was predictable and had gaps.
This is my kind of movie, and IMHO better to follow by European grown on such philosophers like Kant, Nietzsche, Einstein or Hawkings. Religious people would probably dislike this movie due to the obvious reasons. However, ones interested in modern philosophy would find the film intriguing, worth of second view for thinking again how Luc Besson presented some subjects. Don't forget that this is still a science fiction, and '10% of brain capacity' is just a vehicle to present some more complex concepts.
Lucy does come across a little cheesy in parts (the creation of Adam reference / and a lot of scientific inaccuracies) but all in all it has a b-grade throwback sci-fi vibe where anything goes in a world of infinite possibilities. It's quite a ride, one I enjoyed a lot and if you suspend your disbelief you will too!
I loved It. It was weird in its own way and it gets away with it. Also, I like the way this superhero is created and 'destroyed'. Incredibly interesting and refreshing IMO.
I saw it in the movie theater yesterday and I constantly had the feeling that I've seen it before. To me it felt like the writer took parts of several movies/genres and combined them. Add some special effects (lots of them) and the result is Lucy.
The whole thing together just didn't do it..
'Science' lesson crossed with an action movie. I could empathise with Lucy. I took an out of date Lemsip last week and I experienced many of the side effects she goes through in the film. I tend to use 87% of my brain anyway so it was nothing new. Fear me mortals!
Scarlett Johansson Le Amo!!!
A huge bag full of shit. I want my 85 minutes of wasted lifef back!!!
Hahahaha. What?!
I don't even know where to begin to rip this movie apart.
Sure, it has some science fiction in it justifiying some mistakes, sure it has action in it but a certain logic to follow as a viewer to what's happening? Nope.
A deeper meaning to it all? That's make-believe I'd say.
Plot holes? Yes! As vast as the universe.
Even inside the mindless "logic" of this movie, the plotholes make it unbearable to follow.
Making everyone go to sleep with a swipe of your hands probably only works once, huh?
Police won't notice half a dozen cars standing in row with twice as much Asians in suits standing behind them armoring themselves. The reason why the police was called as reinforcement in the first place. Sure.
And not even talking about the people inside the building not being suspicious when they (the evil cliché Asians) all enter it and do a completely unnecessary The Matrix reference. Okay.
Comparing the numbers on metacritic of this movie with The Expendables 3 it is sad that Lucy gets so much positive ("professional") reviews while Expendables isn't.
I found TE3 quite enjoyable, brainless, sure but enjoyable action. This one made me laugh and question the script throughout while feeling strong second hand shame combined with shivers down my spine all the time. Why I specifically compare these two movies?
1) Because the first review on metacritic says Lucy is the "best, coolest, smartest" action movie of this summer, which it isn't. Nowhere near smart, nor the coolest action movie, that's TE3 or another one but definitely not this one.
2) TE3 is much, much smarter than this movie but I wouldn't dare to call TE3 a smart movie, because it isn't. And that is where TE3 wins. It doesn't try to be smart where it can't be smart. Lucy does and fails.
This movie is a great laugh, though.
But other than that it is of the same awful quality that The Other Woman and Tammy are.
One of the worst movies this year. The actually great visuals and good "semi"-fight scenes don't make this movie a good one. Unfortunately.
Horrible movie. Just absolutely terrible.
Shitty film, awful premise and poorly executed.
I found it mentally exhausting counting the things wrong with this film.
Enjoyable movie! Had no expectations going in, which is the best move for something like this. I like Besson's work (as a director) and this isn't a bad addition to the filmography.
I'm in trouble at rate this movie, because the topic fascinates me but as a movie, it certainly far from perfect. I wonder if the goal of picture a human mind can use the ability far above the average people - as protagonist - can be done as an enjoyable blockbuster. So in spite of all its faults I gave it a higher ratings. :)
Great movie, but with a "wtf" end...
Top movie to be honest
I’d heard of this and that it was worth watching, but hadn’t pursued seeing it because Lucy didn’t seem like my type of movie, or at least not a favorite kind. Reading the description right after watching it, I don’t think it’s very fitting and maybe could give the wrong impression to those wondering what it’s about. If you prefer to go in more blind than not, maybe skip reading the rest of this particular paragraph. While I didn’t look at it beforehand, the premise shown on the IMDb movie poster cover stating, "The average person uses 10% of their brain capacity. Imagine what she could do with 100%," wouldn’t have encouraged me to give it a chance, because I strongly disliked the movie, Limitless. Basically though, this is just a long-winded way of me to say, hey, it’s true in this case!
“You shouldn’t judge a book by it’s cover!”
This next bit is especially irrelevant as far as a review about the film itself, so skip over the next few paragraphs if you aren’t interested in my personal life in relation to my media consumption.
I used to love using the elliptical and I would often watch entire movies while using it. Insert those inevitable, unexpected life changes that happen to us all and it’s been too long a while since it’s happened. I’ve recently begun doing other pastime favorite exercise and have been meaning to hop back on the elliptical too.
My boyfriend had recently said he remembered Lucy being good (not that we always agree on what’s good, but he didn’t say he thought I’d dislike it) and it was about to go off Netflix, so I thought why not give it a go while also testing out a never before tried setup for watching while using the elliptical.
I did not watch the entirety while doing so, but I did watch the first 30 minutes that way, in part because I don’t want to overdo it and in part because I was immediately drawn in – and my setup isn’t yet ideal in sight or sound, needs some tweaking.
The cinematography was fantastic. The most basic transitional shots were amazing, the CGI shots were amazing, and even the up close face shots, which I know can sometimes be annoying to many, were amazing.
I appreciated how they kept an idea that is so complex so simple in terms of using it to tell a story. It was a fairly straightforward and to the point, but still exciting, journey – even while being full of questions without answers. The creators not trying to over-complicate it and explore every little option probably kept down the run time too, which is deeply appreciated when at the moment it seems like every newer movie is 2+ hours long, and so often so much of it isn’t necessary and just feels like filler.
The scene where she calls her mom is poetic and so damn beautiful.
Going in, I thought I’d be giving this movie a 7 at most, but guessed it’d be even less. I thoroughly enjoyed being wrong in this scenario.
Add on: Watched it a second time with my boyfriend 3 days later because he seemed a smidge disappointed I hadn't watched it with him, saying he didn't actually recall what happened from his own previous viewing. I focused more on enjoying the visuals this time.
He brought up a point I also thought myself, but didn't mention before; why didn't Lucy take out Mr. Jang after getting the information she needed from him? Hell, she shot and killed a taxi driver for not speaking English without hesitation. If it was written/directed that way for the sole purpose of having him come after her later they could have done a little better. For example, shown her shooting him thinking he'd at least be left to die, or had her interrupted somehow from finishing him off. Yeah?
Another add on that is also a reply to an appreciated comment:
I'm also sad to read through these reviews and see that so many people thought so little of Lucy. I kept seeing the term used, "popcorn movie", and finally looked up the definition to be sure I fully understood what it meant.
popcorn movie: A motion picture without serious dramatic content, a weighty message, or intellectual depth, which serves simply as enjoyable entertainment.
I quite like simple, enjoyable entertainment, and don't view that wordage as some insult when used to describe films, but I don't think it completely and accurately describes Lucy. While I do agree the story was kept simple and without too much complexity, I feel as a whole it was meant to make one consider so many “what ifs” in terms of how humanity has progressed and what more we could be and could accomplish if we somehow had access to or the ability to grasp a truer understanding of our world past what we do. How is that not weighty or intellectually deep? I think some are turned off by the scientific inaccuracies, but ya know, the genre is called science fiction.
Dumb fun. ScarJo is great. But I feel like it ended kinda abruptly.
Turn off your brain for this one because the plot holes and inconsistencies are fucking hilarious. This could have been a genuinely good movie if it was executed better.
I can appreciate fiction not being rooted in reality, but this is the definition of a trashy popcorn flick.
The last line, “now you know what to do…”
Wait, what am I supposed to do? Drugs?
"Lucy" is a very interesting film that raises many questions and encourages reflection. In particular, Scarlett Johansson's excellent performance and the theme of transcendence make the film a true highlight for science fiction fans.
One of the great advantages of the film is that it is very visually designed and impressively shows how Lucy continually increases her abilities. The idea that the human brain, when fully utilized, is capable of transcending the body and achieving transcendence is very fascinating and creates a special dynamic in the film.
Another aspect of the film that makes it so interesting is the way in which Lucy increases her abilities from one level to the next. The percentage increase in her powers is portrayed in a very vivid way, allowing the viewer to experience firsthand how Lucy is continually evolving.
At the beginning of the film, Lucy had only used a small percentage of her brain capacity, but as she gained access to more and more of it, she was able to increase her powers. In the first stage, she gains full control over her own body, allowing her to do things that are impossible for normal humans. In the second stage, she can control and manipulate the bodies of other people by hacking their brains. In the third stage, she has the ability to control matter and can, for example, neutralize weapons or make people pass through walls.
The fourth stage is complete transcendence, where Lucy gains complete control over time and space. In this stage, she can manipulate the universe and everything in it, becoming a higher, transcendent entity.
Overall, "Lucy" is a very fascinating film that raises many questions and encourages reflection.
However, there are also some unanswered questions and criticisms. For example, the origin of the drug is unclear, which could disappoint many viewers. It is also not fully explained what Lucy will do with her newly acquired power and what impact it could have on the world.
Nevertheless, the film is very well structured and vividly portrays the stages that Lucy goes through to ultimately gain complete control over time and matter. Director Luc Besson, also known for films like "Léon: The Professional" and "The Fifth Element", has once again demonstrated his talent and created a visually impressive and thematically profound film.
In summary, "Lucy" is a very fascinating film that is definitely worth watching due to its themes and Scarlett Johansson's performance as the lead actress. I also hope that there will be a sequel that will answer some of the unanswered questions and further develop the plot.
An interesting idea but it could have been better it felt like a mess in some points. 6.3/10
Ridiculous, this movie didn’t make any sense. Maybe it’s only marketed for people with over 20% brain function but to a average dim wit the dots just don’t connect. Maybe if I ever get my hands on some synthetic CPH4 I will watch this again and marvel at its brilliance before I fade away into the great universe.
A movie that is so thought provoking it might prod your brain until it overloads like a NASA PC. Anyway, I love these types of movies, they bring something new to the table and Scarlett Johansen is brilliant in this well written sci-fi thriller. Well worth the 100% watch, just don't go out of your way to give any old suitcase to any fellow out there; or do, who knows what might follow.. If you enjoyed Ex Machina you'd probably like this.
As superficial as you’d expect from a Luc Besson but enjoyable nonetheless.
Scarlett Johanson’s beauty certainly helps the visuals.
Do yourself a favor and never watch this. It's really, really bad.
this movie doesn't even make sense please don't waste your time watching this.
Wtf did I just watch? Please don’t watch this
It's hard to find so many plot holes in a single movie
Non-spoiler review - as long as you've seen the trailer
Oh boy. Let's go through this. First, there is a bit that seriously comes off as racist writing.
Second, Johannsen's performance comes off as so one-note that for a good portion of the film, it's dull. Somewhat 'emotionless' protagonists have been played compellingly before, it can be done - off the top of my head, Prometheus and Hitman.
Thirdly, there are some seriously goofy sequences where the 'cool factor' is not very convincing.
Fourth, the science of the plot is poor to the point that I would guess that a significant percentage of viewers will be able to dispute it.
Fifth, Lucy's super-intelligence is occasionally abandoned for very obvious plot progression, which is annoying to watch.
Sixth, there are some cool visuals, I'll give it that. However, the meaning behind the final sequence is not very well communicated, leaving it feeling underdeveloped.
Seventh, it wasn't boring. It did keep my attention, but I recommend going into this totally as a popcorn film.
A beautiful movie, but it starts off with a plot hole large enough to drive a truck through. Whether or not the substance was intended to be sold on the street as a recreational drug, it wasn't presently against any laws to do so nor was it a controlled substance, so there was no need for the subterfuge involved in moving it around the globe. They could have simply packed it in their on board luggage and walked it through customs. It wasn't even something drug-dogs would have alerted to. The entire rest of the movie follows from this first highly illogical thing.
I can't believe I wanted to see this. I remember someone recommended it, maybe it was a joke. It is conpletely absurd, poorly written and extremely bad performed. Scarlett Johansson looks terrible in all her attempts to be this superhuman. Morgan Freeman is awful too. It is just a very bad action film.
I watched this before Limitless and I couldn't watch Limitless because felt so slow with no thrill.
2001 for the 21st Century
This is one of those films that is easily dismissed as a shlock action sci-fi movie, I did on the first watch. But look deeper and the questions it ask, not necessarily answers, pushes the movie into the true sci-fi classics.
Again I’m not trying to say the science in the movie is correct, but put aside the movie logic, and you’ve got something that questions the human condition, where humanity came from and where it could go which rivals 2001...with a car-chase through Paris and a big gun fight.
I think Scarlett Johansson did a fantastic job of showing a character go from, and excuse the term, dumb blonde bimbo to an all powerful super being, whilst Morgan Freeman does his usual excellent performance as the voice of knowledge and reason whilst portraying that his characters understanding reached it’s limits.
This quite quickly become one of my “guilty pleasure” movies that I’ll quite happily watch for the story, performances, action, writing and direction again and again.
It’s not a 10 out of 10 movie, but it’s not the dumb action flick it may first seem to be and probably takes a second watch to appreciate.
A Pretty stupid movie this is.
You've got to give it to Besson - he seems to have loads of money and access to the best in his trade, and yet he churns out fantasies from a 14-year old teenager mind with lots of action, skin-deep transgressions, and powerful females (Nikita anyone?). Oh, and crappy drum boxes (that's Eric Serra for you).
I admire his trademanshift - this is solid, well-done escapist cinema. I was thoroughly entertained (which can also been said for Le 5ieme Élément, but not Le Grand Bleu), and the script has a promising start but fizzles out quickly. Ok fx (Valerian was better in that respect) .
Its just that as a french person, I am frustrated. Here's a guy with talent and some vision, and a true French voice, and yet he sticks to mindless movies. He could do much more, but maybe he doesn't want to. And you know, that's ok.
So rant over. A solid, entertaining, popcorn movie. Escapism. That's nice.
Superb movie. With one of the most sexy actress on the market. The story is really scientifically plausible and is a delight for scientific minds like me.
This movie is 100% perfect!!
Enjoyable Matrix style action, but it's too short. Think if it had an extra 40-60 mins, or even a 2nd part, it could have been a fantastic epic experience.
I'm so torn. I really enjoyed it, but I know that it's really not good.
This movie Is so bad
I was really confused. This movie was nothing like the previews.
really happy this one can't make it. i'm afraid..............
Great Movie! Intense & Extremely Interesting!
I did enjoy the movie though some of the special effects were too much for me – as well as parts of the story. Though interesting it kind of was too exaggerated at times…
There is a limit to the amount of stupidity you can show you know?
This movie could have been SO much better! It just feels like wasted potential for an amazing movie which seems to be on par with most movies these days.
This is an excellent movie for the initiated. I could relate tremendously with the psychological profile of Lucy. Her strive for knowledge was detaching her away from humanity. The questionable actions she made throughout the movie explained the accelerated extent of her detachment from humanity as well... the random cut scenes in her mind were a bit annoying but exactly how some people use their imagination in critical moments.
I was so on board with this movie until the last 20 minutes. Everything just screeched to an annoying, confusing halt once she got in that room. Leading up to that though I thought it was pretty good.
The best way to describe this film is that it is a reductio ad absurdum on the same theme as 'Limitless'. Not great, but entertaining.
I think Morgan needed cash. Waste of time. Essentially a drug overdose (not a spoiler, this happens fast) and then mind reading and nonsense superpowers because of that. B movie with Morgan Freeman. Bad B movie. Switched it of after 20 minutes. Or 25 or 15 or whatever. Didn't care. Mind reading was the tipping point...
I enjoyed this enormously, Scarlett is good in the lead role its fast paced and modern SCI FI yes a little far fetched but entertaining none the less.
Thumbs up
A real weak movie, absolutely forgetable.
Just watched Lucy...
And I don't know how to feel...
On one hand the entire premise of the movie was completely wrong.. like the whole notion that we only use a fraction of our brain's capacity and that really kept me from enjoying the movie knowing the entire foundation of the movie is just an old misconception because I just kept thinking "that's not even close to real" and either laughing or getting angry at how unrealistic it is.
On the other hand, If I try my best to ignore fact and just accept what the movie is trying to show I mostly really like it. The conflicts kept me interested through the entire movie. And trying to keep this spoiler free and not saying too much, the final resolution kept me thinking about and processing what just happened at least all the way through the credits, which is a good thing in my book.
Another master piece of Besson well done
This film is a fantasy sci-fi with great visuals and while not "realistic" or perfectly executed has a thought provoking concept.
This Movie is awesome, a little bit weird but still awesome and most of the people loved it. I don't like science fiction at all but I love this movie and I recommend it :)
What does this movie try to say? Cool action, cool visual effects, cool actors. But what is the story?
it was really good, great movie, great actress, and a really interesting storyline
My God, one of the best movies I have ever seen.
My God, one of the best movies I have ever seen.
La ignorancia provoca el caos, no el conocimiento.
Gotta say, this movie was cheeseballs. With a few exceptions, it lacks Besson's flair for action. And logically makes no sense. Still fun though.
I soooo wanted to like this one, but it came up way short of the expectations. A poorly developing story so full of obvious holes it gives the Norwegian back roads a run for their money...
I'm sorry, but this is the first project that Luc Besson has been involved in that I can't recommend...
I was disappointed by the movie, I expected a whole lot more of it.
Still, it was entertaining, but it was mostly CGI, 3D special effects, more special effects and... well... oh right, there is Scarlett.
that's it.
still. it was some brainless entertainment, good for an hour or so on the couch with my gf
Bel film , scorre veloce che è un piacere . L idea di base è molto interessante, però poteva essere sviluppata molto Meglio
Hmmmm... Certainly not the best Sci-fi movie in the world. Just
Hmmmm... Certainly not the best Sci-fi movie in the world. Just
Como película de ciencia ficción, falla, y bastante. Luc Besson, como el resto de los seres humanos no tiene control sobre el argumento en el que se basa Lucy: Una mujer desarrolla inteligencia a niveles cósmicos ya que empieza a utilizar el 90% restante de su cerebro. Así que se puso a inventar: por causa de una droga sintética y milagrosa. Desde en un principio descartaría esta idea porque claro, esa hipótesis es absurda en la vida real. Pero en una película se acepta lo que sea, e incluso es algo interesante, así que se deja eso a un lado. Ahora, el problema reside en que la trama es de las más improbables para esta idea, con mafia taiwanesa incluida. Y aquí es donde entra la acción (a lo que se tuvo que recurrir) que de alguna manera es lo único que mantiene la película a flote y por lo menos a mi me mantuvo atento. Así que de esas dos cosas mal mezcladas (acción y sci-fi) Besson por lo menos logró entregar un entretenimiento decente. Pero que no pasa de ahí, ya que todo lo demás que quiso decir sobre la humanidad y el conocimiento fue muy superficial.
I went into this expecting Scarlett Johansson and wasn't disappointed. Sure it's not the best movie ever, and the story itself isn't innovative, but it's a cool movie to watch.
The worst of Luc Besson in one movie...
If you hate abrupt endings, particularly those that leave you begging for more, this is definitely not one for you. A lot more could have been done, also, the build up seemed wildly unnecessary.
Totally far out.
I didn't like this film. It's not what I was expecting at all.
Good effects but otherwise rubbish frankly.
Shout by Daan van den BerghBlockedParent2014-08-01T15:52:01Z
I loved It. It was weird in its own way and it gets away with it. Also, I like the way this superhero is created and 'destroyed'. Incredibly interesting and refreshing IMO.