Very good movie. The cinematography is awsome like the acting of all of the cast (and we can see the inspiration of Tarkovski). If DiCaprio is obviously very good, Tom Hardy isn't far away behind ! Inarritu give us a movie at high level, when you see this you can understand how the shoot could be hard. Like for "Birdman" some shoots like dream add a psychological mood as Malick can do ( and sometimes the shoots are like his shoots, we can think about "Red line" or "Tree of Life", of course it's because of the really good cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki who work before Innaritu for Malick). The story is simple but it's not a problem, you have to the see this in an other way as usual, like for "Birdman" or "Babel". On some point it can be appeared to the Western genre (story, character, place....). So it was spectacular in term of art cinema (not like the blockbuster) but some people can don't like it : it's an Inarritu's movie !
Shout by Erwan MassonBlockedParent2016-03-02T00:22:21Z
Very good movie. The cinematography is awsome like the acting of all of the cast (and we can see the inspiration of Tarkovski). If DiCaprio is obviously very good, Tom Hardy isn't far away behind !
Inarritu give us a movie at high level, when you see this you can understand how the shoot could be hard.
Like for "Birdman" some shoots like dream add a psychological mood as Malick can do ( and sometimes the shoots are like his shoots, we can think about "Red line" or "Tree of Life", of course it's because of the really good cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki who work before Innaritu for Malick).
The story is simple but it's not a problem, you have to the see this in an other way as usual, like for "Birdman" or "Babel". On some point it can be appeared to the Western genre (story, character, place....).
So it was spectacular in term of art cinema (not like the blockbuster) but some people can don't like it : it's an Inarritu's movie !