If you’d ask me what the highlights of the previous 2 Ant-Man movies are, I’d probably answer: I don’t remember much about them, but I liked those quirky scenes narrated by Michael Peña and the creative use of shrinking powers during the set pieces. For as forgettable as both movies are, at least I still remember the set piece with the train in the first movie, or the kitchen fight from the second movie. With this movie, I'm already having trouble remembering any specifics, because all of those typical Edgar Wright touches have been erased in favor of being a big CGI extravaganza. So, allow me to do a general breakdown of the three acts instead.
1st act: We get a set-up that's similar to Spiderman: No Way Home, which means it’s in a hurry to get to the main dish, making every main character look like an irresponsible dumbass in the process. Once we get to the quantum realm, we're met with a lot of cringe comedy. The design of the world is fine, it feels like a mashup of prequel era Star Wars, Avatar, The Fifth Element and Spy Kids, not like an original creation. A stronger, visionary director probably would've made a big difference here, or at least one who knows how to use the volume stages, because that might’ve avoided the Spy Kids comparisons.
2nd act: Jonathan Majors arrives to do some actual acting, and he somehow pulls it off despite the hammy, pseudo-intellectual lines given to him by the script. Michelle Pfeiffer also gets some time to shine, when she's on the screen with Majors it feels like the movie actually comes to life for a brief second. Still, the scenes with Kang feel tonally inconsistent with the rest of the movie, and I’m not sold on the idea of him being the Avengers level threat we’ve been waiting for. When it comes to the other actors, most of them are given nothing interesting to do, the supposed co-lead of this movie (according to the title) included. I don't like picking on younger actors, but it needs to be said that Emma Fuhrmann expressed more emotion during her 10 second appearance as Cassie Lang in Avengers: Endgame than Kathryn Newton did here. In terms of story, this portion of the movie is all about set-up and clunky exposition as delivered through monologues. One of the characters even gets introduced with his own 'previously on Ant-Man' recap, which I find insulting and shows what little faith this studio has in its audience. Besides, it probably would’ve been better to cut this character, because his inclusion is easily one of Marvel's worst creative decisions (the design and visual effects are laughable). Generally I'd say this act is pretty boring, and occasionally embarrassing.
3rd act: The movie decides it wants to be Aquaman instead, so we're getting an extended battle sequence of stuff fighting other stuff, with plenty of flashes, lasers and more stuff. It's big, it's loud, and I check out. Every cheesy crowdpleaser deserves its fair share of deus ex machina moments, but this movie spams the action movie trope of 'our main character is in peril only to get saved at the very last moment' to death at this point. Furthermore, the cringe comedy makes a big return, with Corey Stoll delivering a line so bad that it will become a meme (you'll know once you see the movie). More punchy stuff, more pew pew, more 'comedy', and thankfully the movie finally decides it has wasted enough of my time. We get a final montage that includes the first good joke of the movie, and the credits roll. Nothing is achieved, absolutely nothing. This is a cynically conceived advertisement that does not deserve your time.
3/10
Like an orgy: lots of action and sensations, though a bit messy and will leave you feeling empty and under-satisfied when you're done.
Those of you who loved the charm and comedy of the first Ant-Man are going to be as let down as a Chinese weather balloon.
I LOVE IT
-One of the best visuals in the MCU I have seen, everything is just beautiful.
-The jokes is not for everyone I guess, some people think they are lame and others like me is funny as hell, and its not forced at least I did not have that feeling.
-The story is not the best but deftly not the worst but makes sense and is easy to follow along.
This feels like a bad Rick and Morty episode.
:asterisk_symbol:Looks up credits
Oh, ok.
This move should’ve been called: Janet Van Dyne’s Adventures in Star Warsmania.
Quantum Physics has so many incredible theories and hypothesis that could be explored and Marvel decided to take us to some random Star Wars planet / galaxy.
The jokes weren’t even that funny.
This is epitome of what the bulk of Marvel films have been for me. It’s not a ‘good’ film, but it is undoubtedly an enjoyable film.
There’s a lot of points you have to accept and just move on. You could easily pick them apart, but you just have to chose to enjoy the film regardless. The most egregious being when a character essentially says “oh by the way this thing happened, and it’ll be essential to how the final act plays out. Here’s some flash backs to earlier points in the film to prove it happened. Despite none of those moments actually being in the film… just take my word that it happened” It’s bad, but if you just accept it an move on. The film is quite enjoyable.
A bit too cheesy at times, but all in the appropriate tone. It's a fun popcorn flick that knows what we're there for and doesn't get distracted trying to flesh out things better left questioned. Mid-tier MCU, but still something fun and a good setup for the coming Kang conflict.
I have to question why people who dislike this movie are even at a superhero film in the first place. There are things to criticize here, and that's what keeps this from being a great movie instead of a good one. What it gets right, though, is still plenty of fun and much better than many of the overly complicated 3+ hour films studios have been pumping out to try and create something richer than the format allows. I'd take more of this over some of the other MCU alternatives anyday.
How is this film the second lowest rated MCU movie ever? Is it perfect? Not at all. But it is Ant-Man cheesy level enjoyable, with memorable set pieces, and a great introduction to the next big villain! Speaking of the villain, Jonathan Majors is incredible! He oozes of a smooth confidence that is more intimidating than if we was angry. The setting feels almost like a knock off Star Wars film, even down to outfits, locations, comic relief side characters. Don't trust the critics, check this one out!
Rating: 3/5 - 7.5/10 - Worth Watching
Ant-Man movies have never been the best Marvel movies but they manage to entertain. It was a good start for phase 5 and what's to come. I just wonder if the Kangs will be able to fill Thanos' shoes
This was a great movie but as a Marvel movie, this was one hell of a set up for the future. I never imagined I'd see Kang on the big screen, and Jonathan Major was a amazing cast.
Overall, a pretty bad start to the MCU Phase 5, as the plot (which there was almost none of) was morbidly disinteresting and at times excruciatingly dull. Yes... there was action and the CGI was okay, but no where near as good as I thought it would be. Cassie and Scott's relationship prominently shows how Marvel are running out of original ideas.
"Visually beautiful" is really the only good thing I can say about it. Except for MODOK.
The characters were all flat, despite the superb cast putting everything they had into it... It's just bad writing.
Am I becoming a harsher critic or are Marvel movies just getting worse? Probably a little bit of both, but this one certainly makes it feel like the latter. I've described much of the recent Marvel content as serviceable; that is to say, not good, but not bad either. I can't be so generous with this film. It was bad. The dialogue. The plot. The special effects. The dialogue. The humor. The setting. The dialogue. But really, the dialogue was bad. So full of clichés. Bland. Derivative. Forced.
Now, I prefer my reviews to have at least some specifics to hold myself accountable and make sure I'm not just throwing out substance-less word vomit, so here are a couple of problems that I still remember one week after watching this mess: (1) Janet keeping all this crap a secret; (2) Janet continuing to keep all this crap a secret when the crap is practically overflowing; (3) Janet making dumb excuses as to why she won't tell everyone about this secret crap. Okay, I'll throw in some non-Janet secret keeping related issues as well. (4) MODOK doesn't work in live action; (5) the quantum realm's rag-tag team of rebels is underdeveloped and I didn't care about them at all; (6) daughter hacking quantum realm AV system was an eye roll moment; and (7) Michael Douglas' final(?) line (something akin to "Sorry I'm late") was groan inducing.
It would be unfair to be so harsh and not also acknowledge the film's positives. It's a short list: (1) Jonathan Majors. He is the only one that sells his lines. Unfortunately he isn't enough to carry the movie.
Whenever I am sitting down feeling contemplative and working on my bucket list, I always reflect upon my lifelong desire to one day see M.O.D.O.K.'s bare ass. Thanks, Marvel Studios! I can now scratch this one off the list.
Oh my god. I was wondering if I'm too old for this kinda shitty-goofy-superhero movies, and I'm impressed by the reviews coming up. Nah man, seriously this movie is like a really really bad Rick and Morty episode written by a insta-teenager.
Sorry, I'm not a internet troll hater, I regret paying for the ticket and wasting my time watching this lackluster film.
I went into "Quantumania" with really low expectations, since none of the trailers really spoke to me. Unfortunately, these doubts were confirmed in the finished film. I liked the two predecessors quite a bit. They were small, family-friendly stories, where the main goal was not yet again to save the whole world from ultimate destruction. The humor, in particular, worked very well in these films.
In the third Ant-Man film, almost none of these strengths remain. The jokes have been reduced to a bare minimum, and the few that are still there often don't work. The solid action sequences from the previous films, which creatively dealt with the different sizes of the characters, are also no longer present. Instead, nearly the entire film is set in a CGI environment that I would describe as "barely okay" in terms of visuals. The villain M.O.D.O.K., on the other hand, looks like a character model from an early PS3 game. They couldn't even get his lip sync right.
The decision to move the action completely to the quantum realm isn't just a visual disappointment, though. The story also suffers from it. Instead of a self-contained little adventure like in its predecessors, "Quantumania" has the task of setting up the "big picture." It's just too bad that they forgot that the film also has to work on its own. In any case, there is hardly any suspense; the new characters are too underdeveloped for that, and the old ones get almost nothing to do. In the last act, everything falls completely apart until the film ends rather abruptly. Any risk is avoided, and the status quo remains. The MCU films have handled that better in the past.
However, there are a few positive aspects to "Quantumania," particularly some of the performances. For instance, Paul Rudd is still pretty good in the lead role. Kathryn Newton also does a solid job as the new Cassie Lang. And to my delight, I noticed that Michelle Pfeiffer gets a lot more to do. Most impressive, however, is Jonathan Majors as the new MCU supervillain Kang. He really has a great presence, even if his character spends a bit too much time delivering long monologues. I'm definitely looking forward to seeing more of Majors in this multiverse in the future. And that's at least a somewhat conciliatory thought. All in all, I didn't really like "Quantumania", but it's not a total failure either.
Ant Man and the Wasp: Quantumania was a fun way to lose a couple of hours, but I could never shake the feeling that I was watching highlights from 3 or 4 better films. This is a movie just stuffed to the brim with characters, stories, and concepts that never really get a chance to breathe. On top of that was what should have been an amazingly inventive world kneecapped by effects that are going to age like an open milk container left in the basement. I know that many complained that Marvel's Phase 4 was too slow and meandering, but was packing the next phase into a single film the answer?
I really wanted the quantum realm to have an actual identity, but everything felt like something I've already seen before, most likely on Star Wars. Quite a mid movie and that's a compliment. The only thing truly good about it is Jonathan's performance. But it also feels like he came on set thinking he was making one movie and Paul and everyone else came to make a different movie.
Enjoyable. It was fun in a quirky kind of way. Kangs storyline is confusing because they’re multiple versions of him across the MCU so far that I wasn’t sure if this is the good guy or bad. Or if they’re all bad and we are supposed to pick the lesser of multiple evils? Who knows… definitely can’t wait to find out though.
I wish they’d stop casting hot actors to play a sympathetic villain. Just give me a villain like the Borg, no redeeming qualities there, no goal for the greater good either. Just complete selfishness. I want to root for the hero without doubt. :sob:
It is a good movie. I liked it; just a new style for the ant-man movie series now. The story is not the best and not as funny, but as it shows in the trailer is about family, someone calls Vin Diesel!! There are 2 post-credit scenes; the second is after the credits; you need to see them.
Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania
How the hell does one of the biggest franchises that exists currently end up as this? So poorly written from beginning to end. One of Marvel's worst looking movie, the CGI is sometimes terrible and other times good but the shift between the two took me out of it a couple times. The lighting is atrocious, it's as if someone was standing above the actors with leds. Worst of all is the cringey dialogue paired with the bad acting, holy shit was that bad! I mean come on lady you can't say "trillions" and be serious about it. Apart from Jonathan Majors and Paul Rudd it was filled with awful performances worst of all was Kathryn Newton she can't say a single line without being corny.
Jonathan Majors absolutely steals the show whenever he's around and his character has presence, somewhat like Darth Vader has. The whole vibe of the movie felt Star Wars-ish and I enjoyed the sci-fi elements and the aliens they were very imaginative. Still wondering if that holes obsessed alien goo was an analogy for the movie being filled with plot holes. The inclusion of M.O.D.O.(F.)K. was a good one, I enjoyed everything with him, he was funny and everyone laughed hard in the theater when he showed up. The comedy was, for once, well balanced and the action in the third act was enjoyable. Michelle Pfeiffer and Michael Douglas' characters were very awkward to me. I feel like we barely got any development with Ant-Man and The Wasp (which she was barely in) but we got plenty for Kang which I felt like it was his movie.
I don't think this was the worst Marvel movie ever but it's definitely down there, great setup for the setup of the next setup though.
Is weakly scripted and depends too often on its talented actors reacting to green screen imagery. The world building parts rescued this from being a very boring affair so 5/10 it is.
I don't hate it, but it was disappointing
Pros:
- Jonathan Majors killed it, even when given a poorly written character
Some extremely impressive visual effects
Intro and outro felt like the original movie. I wish the rest of the movie was like that
Character designs were pretty great. MODOK would've looked much better with his head covered, but still a good MCU design. Alien designs were fantastic
Cons:
- Modok and Darren were both butchered. I don't hate the design as much as others seem to, but his personality is just wrong. Not just for MODOK as a comic character, but Darren as an established MCU character
Kang was extraordinarily inconsistent and not the threat the marketing made him out to be. He can completely obliterate a background character with the point of a finger, but if that same blast hits a main character, they just get thrown back a bit.
Pacing was awful, and there were no meaningful connections built at ALL. Other than Scott, any character could've died, and it would've meant nothing. In fact, the entire movie was inconsequential. Council of Kangs are doing what they would've done anyway
Most jokes fell flat. The "don't be a dick" thing was painful. A shame considering how well-written and witty the original Ant-Man is
Bill Murray is only there for marketing purposes
Nowhere near as bad as people are saying, and I'm exhausted of Marvel content. Would watch this over Eternals, or Thor: Love and Thunder.
Oh god was this lame. Jonathan Majors, Paul Rudd, and Kathryn Newton sell the heck out of their roles but the plot was so weak. Some cringe acting by the side cast too. It felt like the actress who played Gentora learned to act by playing her role in the movie. The Quantum Realm was completely unimaginative. Most of it was like Star Wars, Kang’s minions were stormtroopers, there was even an Avatar realm in there. Zero points for creativity.
Like I said at the end of Thor: Love and Thunder, Marvel is SO done.
Rated a Connor 10, normal 7.5
A fun one!
I had a terrific time watching 'Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania', despite hearing 'meh' things about it here and there online. It surpassed my expectations, to be honest. Great cast, entertaining action, super interesting world building (my favourite from the MCU for a while, in that regard) and the humour is good.
Star of the show in my opinion is Michelle Pfeiffer. I don't recall her standing out in 'Ant-Man and the Wasp', but here she's excellent from beginning to end. Elsewhere, Jonathan Majors is brilliant - great to see that guy all over the place recently. Paul Rudd remains a strong lead, while the likes of Michael Douglas and Kathryn Newton are positives too.
Love the Quantum Realm setting. I'm nothing like an MCU nut, I'm only aware of the films, so didn't know what to expect, but the place looks fantastic - from the enviroment to the creatures; shoutout Veb. Like Pfeiffer, Corey Stoll didn't really register on my radar in prior films, but him as M.O.D.O.K. is a lot of fun.
Looking at my personal MCU ranking, this goes in at no. 8 - I didn't anticipate that! A literal quick glance at the average rating on here suggests I'm in the minority but I truly found much enjoyment from this. Quite the improvement on Ant-Man 2, which is at the bottom of my aforementioned ranking.
The screenplays of these Marvel movies seem more and more tired every time, the same things and plot twists seem to happen every time. Does it still make sense to keep dumping millions of dollars on them?
It was a fine movie that set up the next big bad; however, it left a lot to be desired in character development and plot. It seemed like the end of the movie left us in the exact same place as the beginning though.
This is a quality film but more than that it brings together so many pieces of the Marvel universe like the quantum realm and the multiverse
This week, commenting on the last episode of Marvel's phase 4, I was told that few films are original lately, and that it's easy to see that there are scripts similar to others. Quantumania is a clear example of this, because the other day I didn't see Ant-Man and the Wasp, I saw Tron Legacy.
Maybe it's just how critical I'm being lately with the franchise that has made me go to the cinema the most in my life, but I kept seeing similarities, similar plots, sequences and scenes, which made the experience less enjoyable than expected. Not even the spectacular special effects (not you, Modok. I find the way they've revealed the appearance of one of Marvel's darkest villains in Quantumania so embarrassing that I refuse to comment on it) didn't turn me away from that idea.
Aside from that constant sense of deja-vu, I was grateful to see that the power scales were correct: if you put characters like Ant-Man and the Wasp next to the villain of the film, it's understandable that there's that disparity, and I have to admit that I'm starting to see Jonathan Majors, who I came to loathe in Lovecraft Territory and Loki (yes, he's THAT character), but who has managed to please me with his gestures and way of acting. Looking forward to seeing him in the original version.
Like its predecessors, the third part of Scott Lang's particular saga is still as mediocre as all the others, but it manages to get a smile out of you from time to time. And Bill Murray is in it, what more could we ask for?
Everything is nice, nice CGI, a bit of humor, fast action. However, I have an irresistible impression that I have already seen these plot solutions somewhere, for example in Star Wars. ;)
The building is good, but the ending disappointing.
It tries to keep the humorous vibe that goes with Ant-Man, but a looot of the jokes fall flat and/or are just stupid.
It's entirely CGI, and with one line of thought: "Quantum means weird: Let's mix whatever weird thing we can thing about but make it look like Star Wars cantina"Some ideas are interesting, some are not, but it's just brushed over and unexploited.
For the characters, it's a bit weird. Not an Ant-Man but a Let's bring the whole family movie. Which mostly does not work.
Paul Rudd does the job. Not much more to say, he was a good fit before, still is. The character is set now, so nothing really new (a bit of a let down on a third movie), but the Scott parts (as in non Ant-Man) are fun.
Cassie being a rebel, also genius scientist, and having her own suit, is a pretty nice thing (probably going for some future teen avengers). I felt the character was well balanced since she's still a child and doesn't know what she's doing, she did not become an instant superhero.
But Hank was very disappointing. He has mostly some punchlines and poses, but overall doesn't bring much to the movie. He really felt out of place most of the time.
Not much better from Janet. Basically "shut up, I had another life there and I won't talk about it" for more than half the movie, and almost nothing afterwards.
And Hope is mostly absent. Following the parents, has a minimum utility in the weird scene, fights a bit at the end.
The Quantum Realm residents have some interesting designs. But again, most of the jokes/punchlines fall flat. The talk about holes was funny the first time, not the fourth.
MODOK was insufferably annoying. Jar Jar Binks level. Looks like lo-fi CGI that really detonates in the middle of an already all CGI movie, like a botched photoshop with different resolution images. No idea if he was supposed to be funny or tragic or weird or a mix, but whatever, all of his scenes are cringe, topped at his ending.
Kang, however, was great. Well, Majors is great, and the character is mostly good. But its use and ending are underwhelming to say the least.
He's building a huge army, destined to conquer the multiverse and it all gets trashed by only one big guy.
He supposedly rule the Quantum Realm, but is totally unaware that there is a whole civilization of more technologically advanced ants.
His fighting abilities are not that great (not supposed to be his strength) even if it tries to make us think so, having a whole army flee from him, but that makes the all ending being a punching contest with Ant-Man a bit stupid.
He has supposedly already defeated so many Avengers that he can't remember. He was supposedly so dangerous that all his other versions leagued together to banish him. But seriously, being defeated that easily by Ant-Man, what could he have done against Thor, or Hulk, or a whole team of Avengers ?
Small annoying thing, that is pretty usual: the whole concept is that it's impossible to get out of the Quantum Realm, yet once it's convenient, they just go back however they want. Janet just spends a few minutes on Kang's computer to open a portal back (and directly to their basement !). Meaning there is already everything for it to work, there is no need for extra hardware or energy source or whatever, just need to configure something. She does it in a few minutes and he couldn't manage it in all these years ?? And then, after the supposedly only chance closes, they just conveniently have a second opened, instantly, just like that, at the right place (supposedly by Cassie this time). So again, she figures it out in a few minutes ??
A word about the big scene. I suppose it was meant to be a cool climax, but it just felt annoying and stupid.
In the first movies, going in the Quantum Realm was something bad happening when you went too small with the suit.Now they're in it, yet they can still use the suits to get bigger or smaller or much smaller or it seems even Quantum Realm smaller...
Not clear why the module/engine/core/whatever has been gigantized, yet he needs to get quantum small to get to it ?
And then there's this whole probability thing.
It's meant to be different versions depending on decisions at that moment. So identical up to the point they split. So how the hell is there the BR version ? Why would all decide to help him ? They're all here to save their daughter. By comparison, the Wasp has just a few barely seen after-images. And I get the symbolism of all disappearing when they joined, but come one, how does that make any sense ? So yeah, what a waste of money on that scene.
So a few good ideas, a good start, but the whole second half is full of disappointment. An ok entertainment mixed with very annoying things.
Formulaic, Funny, Promising Future
Ant-Man and The Wasp - Quantumania , third edition in the Ant Man Franchise is a generic yet fun film from Marvel which is self aware of what it meant to provide. Ant Man 3 provides the quintessential origin story of the biggest threat after Thanos and it does well to establish Jonathan Majors as Kang the Conqueror and flashes his potential down the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Baring a solid introduction of Kang, some rib tickling humour, some vibrant new characters of the quantum realm , Ant Man 3 is pretty generic and routine in its approach by Marvel standards. Still an important film in the current phase which adds the missing pieces of the bigger future. 2 end credits scenes are probably the best parts of the film.
Check my Instagram:
www.instagram.com/stream.genx
Formulaic, Funny, Promising Future
Ant-Man and The Wasp - Quantumania , third edition in the Ant Man Franchise is a generic yet fun film from Marvel which is self aware of what it meant to provide. Ant Man 3 provides the quintessential origin story of the biggest threat after Thanos and it does well to establish Jonathan Majors as Kang the Conqueror and flashes his potential down the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Baring a solid introduction of Kang, some rib tickling humour, some vibrant new characters of the quantum realm , Ant Man 3 is pretty generic and routine in its approach by Marvel standards. Still an important film in the current phase which adds the missing pieces of the bigger future. 2 end credits scenes are probably the best parts of the film.
Check my Instagram:
www.instagram.com/stream.genx
VFX and the world they built was amazing as always, and visually beautiful, but other than that it didn't really feel all that special, i still liked it, but yeah /:
also i loved seeing Kathryn Newton in this, she was great i guess
and Jonathan's performance as Kang was amazing
but also, re-including that derren character and even giving him some type of "death scene" was absolutely unnecessary :skull:, and his overall presence and character design in this movie was just plain fucking atrocious, i hated that bit so much; also, why the hell is Bill Murray in an MCU movie, lets be fucking for real
i'm sorta disappointed and sad to see MCU phase 5 kick off like this, but well, i still have hope for the other movies and whats to come, and the ending of the movie where Scott has some doubtful internal monologue + that post credit scene of all the Kang's from every universe appearing one after another was... intriguing..
but i can't lie, some of my favorite moments were:
when they got sucked into that portal Cassie made, and they kept getting smaller and smaller and tried to maneuver between all the obstacles around them
and also when they had to go and get the Core, that scene really showed Scott's skills as Ant Man for me
8/10
Welcome To
Sub-Atomica
ANT-MAN AND THE WASP
QUANTUMMANIA
is the 31st entry into
The MCU
And is a direct line
Into the beginning of
Phase 5 and will be a direct line into
Avengers Kang Dynasty
(2025) as stated by
Kevin Feige.
I thought this was a great movie
and has definitely done it's job well
Impacting
The MCU
And setting it up for
The culmination of
THE MULTIVERSE SAGA
(2025-2026).
Jonathan Majors
Absolutely Knocks it clean out the
Ball Park with his
Outstanding performance
Of "Kang"
and with that soft spoken
Voice
But very strong all
Powerful persona
I found him menacing
Scary and definitely
An "Avengers
level threat"
Equal To Thanos
If not more so.
The way Marvel
Is slowly building
"Kang The Conqueror"
right from Loki S1
Is fantastic, tremendous actually because come
Avengers The Kang Dynasty
and
Avengers Secret Wars
In 2025-2026
You know he is going to be near enough unstoppable
And the biggest problem to the hole of creation
In every timeline and
Every possible timeline.
We can not comprehend
The scale of Chaos and
Destruction this
"Space King"
Will do across
The Entire Multiverse
Trillions and Trillions+
Of lives are at stake
And us
The Marvel
Fandom are in for
A real treat.
We are in safe hands
With Kevin Feige
And he's going deliver
To us something on a scale we have not seen
The likes of yet
And now
Ant-Man and the Wasp Quantumania
Has officially kicked
Phase 5 off
We have an extraordinary experience ahead
and I'm here for every
Glorious moment
Of it.
I Loved the emotional family
Bond that this 3rd installment
Put front and centre
And Kathryn Newton
As Cassie Lang
Put in an exceptional performance,
Great chemistry between her
and Scott.
The VFX we're fantastic
And after all our visits
The Quantum Realm
This Time Still
Felt and Looked Fresh
and New,
Quantum people in
The Quantum Realm
Wow, super interesting
and so different from anything
We have seen before,
"I loved it".
This was an emotional
Rollercoaster ride of
Fun, excitement, thrills and spills
But with a grounded balance
Of Heart felt family emotion
Of the lengths a parent will
Go to too save and keep their
Child safe.
"(The things anyone of us
would do for love hey)".
Verdict: a solid 3rd
Installment that brings
Something new to
The MCU, elements that
Will impact it and change it
Forever.
outstanding
Performances
All around.
(Unlike Kang
If I did have power
Over the entire Multiverse
Timelines,
No Way I Would Skip
To The End Of The MCU
To See How It All Plays Out)
(I want to be in the loop
Forever).
KANG WILL RETURN
MORE THAN :a: FAN
this film was fun for the most part though there were 2 things i really couldn’t get past.
First, Cassie’s entire plot line. She causes this entire movie because she’s so set on “helping people” while completely ignoring the fact that the very actions she’s taking can have negative consequences on those she’s trying to help. I personally really dislike how she was never held responsible (even by herself) for how harmful her actions were/can be towards others. Just because you have good intentions doesn’t mean you can act blindly in every scenario.
Second, Darren’s character being a head the entire movie was very much giving George Lopez in Shark Boy & Lava Girl. I couldn’t get past the visual of it because it really didn’t seem to fit with the advanced technology vibe of the rest of the movie. I didn’t mind his character arch but just wish the visual had been different.
I found this movie to be extremely boring, even though the scriptwriters have the characters remind us what happened since the last time.
I enjoyed Quantumania, but it still has its flaws. Mainly my usual MCU gripes, tries way too hard to be funny, and the Green Screen looks awful to me.
In the humor department, I laughed at the "Holes" joke, and "Don't Be A Dick" scene. I did not like what they did with MODOK. I was spoiled by the image of him, without even realizing I was spoiled. I thought it was a meme.
Jonathan Majors was my favorite part of the film. Emotional performance, but manipulative. I look forward to meeting those "Variants".
more of a 6.5 than a 7 ; I liked the cinematography/world building/special effects but the story was very "thin"
This crap makes me wanna rewatch the infinity saga. Ill do just that
The first half wasn’t that interesting but it delivered what the name said unlike MoM, since the abundance of creatures explained the Quantamania. The second half was amazing and the acting was great
(no spoilers except where marked)
It really isn't bad. The plot actually makes sense, great performance by everyone involved. Visuals are kind of Spy Kids-y though. Jonathan Majors really is terrifying as Kang. Only thing I didn't like is lazy writing especially the ants living inside quantum realm but in an alternative timeline sort of thing, which makes their civilization age 1000 years in a day. This seemed like something they had to come up on the spot to make the finale possible.
It's a good watch, definitely better than DS2
Legitimately one of the worst films I've ever seen. I love the MCU but lately it's just been outright bad. Here's hoping Feige is smart enough to remove Jeff Loveness from Kang Dynasty, but I'm not getting my hopes up. Maybe James Gunn can sway me with his MCU swan song. We'll see.
It amazes me that, with all the terrible movies we had to bear all these years, “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania” became the one that let the entire world realize that Marvel movies suck. Honestly, I thought this was just as forgettable as usual, if not slightly more tolerable than the average. At least it’s short, fast-paced, and, above everything, it doesn’t take itself so damn seriously. If you have never been that serious about superhero flicks, I doubt you will face troubles with Marvel’s newly found taste for camp and self-aware humor.
The only truly embarrassing thing was Jonathan Major’s overacting, the rest was a not too inspired blend of Star Wars-alike space operas and multigenerational family comedies that can offer a couple of hours of serviceable entertainment. This time I didn't mind the plot holes that much, if not for one portion that seems to be completely missing in the second half.
Quantumania is a solid start to phase 5. The movie is fun, but a bit predictable at times. There are quite a few jokes that don't land as well, but that doesn't stand in the way of it being enjoyable. The world is built beautiful, but the absolute high point for me was Kang and the performance of Jonathan Majors. We have a new amazing villain on our hands, people!
Pros
- Ant-Man comedy is still there
- some great action sequences
- amazing visuals of the Quantum Zone (ILM and Digital Foundry are just great at what they do)
- Paul Rudd continues to be fantastic as Ant-Man. His comedic timing and delivery are so good.
- the setup of Kang the Conqueror and Jonathan Major’s performance is top notch
- the rumored cameo is real and I loved it
Cons
- lackluster story that was a pretty weak start for Phase 5
- tone is all over the place
- some terrible CGI. Modok is sooooo bad I’m wondering if that was intentional.
- so many characters that we are supposed to care about, but we don’t even know their names
- continue to miss that “Marvel spark” with Disney produced films. I feel that Disney needs to just let Marvel do what it wants and make that money like they did for so long. I just hope Phase 3 wasn’t the peak.
All in all, the film is entertaining. It’s very formulaic, but it’s not the disaster the critics are saying it is. Parents there is some strong language (s word a couple times) and sexual references but that was all I noticed.
3.5/5 stars - good enough for me to recommend a viewing. The post 3D was actually not terrible so if you enjoy that experience, go for it.
Pros
- Ant-Man comedy is still there
- some great action sequences
- amazing visuals of the Quantum Zone (ILM and Digital Foundry are just great at what they do)
- Paul Rudd continues to be fantastic as Ant-Man. His comedic timing and delivery are so good.
- the setup of Kang the Conqueror and Jonathan Major’s performance is top notch
- the rumored cameo is real and I loved it
Cons
- lackluster story that was a pretty weak start for Phase 5
- tone is all over the place
- some terrible CGI. Modok is sooooo bad I’m wondering if that was intentional.
- so many characters that we are supposed to care about, but we don’t even know their names
- continue to miss that “Marvel spark” with Disney produced films. I feel that Disney needs to just let Marvel do what it wants and make that money like they did for so long. I just hope Phase 3 wasn’t the peak.
All in all, the film is entertaining. It’s very formulaic, but it’s not the disaster the critics are saying it is. Parents there is some strong language (s word a couple times) and sexual references but that was all I noticed.
3.5/5 stars - good enough for me to recommend a viewing.
I love paul rudd and still a talented actor and did a great job along with some of the other cast but the movie itself falls short of being anything amazing but better than the first but got nothing on the second and it felt rushed, over done, didn’t know what they were doing, cheesy, weird and not like any other marvel film also felt a little like marvel crossed with star wars but it did have it’s pros because It was entertaining, had a good sense of humour, the action was decent, some of effects were great and most of cast did alright so i give it credit on that but shame it didn’t live up to my hype and the second film and not a good start for phase 5 for the MCU.
All I'm going to say is the critics got it all wrong. Well, at least a few of them. This movie was the best of the three. Kang is a badass. The rest of the cast was great as well. Not gonna get into spoilers, or anything. Just check it out yourself. Even if it isn't your cup of tea, it will at the very least entertain you .
A lesser Marvel movie, largely because the visual effects dampen the impact of the story. It's still enjoyable and Rudd is as engaging as ever but here's hoping future movies within Phase 5 are more memorable than this one.
Given these movies' silly nature, this one fails to set the tone for Kang. I was hoping for some intense acting in the Majors x Pfeiffer scenes at least, but it was mostly a brief flashback. Janet not telling the others what's going on pissed me off lmao.
My highlight was when, uhh, Jonathan Majors' sexy bare arms. And the super smart cyborg ants, I guess. Gotta wait for Loki Season 2.
Why did they do modok like that? Marvel gotta do better. The movie was good but it didn’t give the usual marvel set up to another movie which most of them have been missing as of late. Show how this adventure to the quantum realm actually affects the rest of the mcu instead of quickly ending the movie after the climax then forcing the audience to sit through credits to see a scene with little relevance to the future. Seeing Loki was dope tho.
Everyone was calling Thanos a fanny, he would have smoked that Kang
It’s a solid entry to kick off phase 5 and wasn’t nearly half as bad as what the critics were suggesting. It did lack some of the hearts of the ealier entries and sure that’s a minus but that’s about it. That said overall I still had fun with it, certainly more so than with L&T and particularly Wakanda Forever which is a much weaker movie than this one (sorry).
Fair play. Good movie, not really a great one. 6/10 would do for now
It is a pretty entertaining movie, that is at least better than the second movie. That has way higher reviews than it. Since for one the villain is far superior.
The movie just gets sillier lines as it goes on with less of the jokes landing. Also yes the movie isn’t oozing in originality. The movie is Journey to the Center of Earth meets Tron Legacy, with Ant-Man.
Quantamania : Was definitely not great, but didn't feel like it was that bad either.... There was a Quantam Realm in it, but they really didn't wanted to show much of it, i mean they showed a lot but not much exposure enn thonni, and the VFX mainly of MODOK was..... :no_mouth: And Kathyrn Newton as Cassie Lang.... I don't know whether to convey it as "A Miscast or A Mistake" But she was bad, there was this hope/motivation speech thing nearing the climax and in that scene it felt like all she was doing was basically line reading. Paul Rudds charm did work like a charm:sweat_smile: Evangeline Lilly as Hope.. meh nothing much to say, Michael Douglas as Hank was Michael Douglas as Hank, Michelle Pfeiffer was definitely good too.... But the best dish of the course was Jonathan Majors as Kang.... Their intention was to show how menacing he is, or they are... And i personally felt like they succeeded in it. There were no huge consequences, but there was a pretty good consequence and the 2 Credit Scenes were... MORE THAN WHAT I EXPECTED IT TO BE.... Maybe, just maybe this would've worked better as a Special One Hour Feature ?
P.S : IS THERE ANYWAY TO RECAST KATHRYN NEWTON ?
So…. This one was out there. Like, way out there. It was good. I enjoyed it… but man was it out there.
Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania continues Marvel Studios path of experimentation. Yes it's a big budget superhero movie but this installment of the Ant-Man movies pivots from the previous two.
It changes the narrative and how we interpret the characters we've come to know.
Marvel is building an overarching story that pays off in time. This is only the end of act one... I think people forget that.
There’s definitely some highs and lows in this film.
The spfx are outstanding. I found myself being reminded of Star Wars at times with he multitude of different creatures and settings. Jonathan Majors is brilliant. Kathryn Newton portrayal of Cassie felt relatable and humbling.
The story seemed a bit underdeveloped and I feel we missed out on some major character development in regards to Cassie. I wish we got more of her story during the blip.
This movie pretty much leads directly into Avengers: The Kang Dynasty an I’m curious to see how these characters get tied back in.
Just got back from the theater. We thought it was pretty good. I'd give it a 7/10. Fun way to kill a couple hours.
Story was ok. Tried to be funny in parts where it wasn't needed. Main character arcs were good though.
MODOK design was ok but it's like they put the B team on it. Especially when you compare that character to some of the other creature designs.
I feel like Billy Murry was in there for no real reason. Could have easily cut that part.
Kang was pretty cool. Future movies with other Kangs are going to get really interesting.
I should give the disclaimer that I am not a Paul Rudd fan and this franchise is by far my least favourite of the Marvel Universe. (I am, however, a fan of Evangeline Lilly and Michelle Pfeiffer). The movie was overpowered by special effects that left actors reacting to blue screens. The writing was devoid of any clever insights into time and multiverse travel. There was no depth to the villain that would raise the threat level. Frankly I was underwhelmed and bored. I give this film a 5 (yawn) out of 10 [Marvel Superhero Adventure]
This movie was really disappointing to me. The story was complicated but it didn’t manage to engage the attention. There were a few funny scenes though, but mostly the jokes felt a bit forced and cringy.
Scott has always been one of my favourite characters, but even he couldn’t save this movie.
Strongest MCU drop in a while :thumbsup_tone5:
I liked it. Good humor but still a serious movie.
Didn't like the whole "Hey there is this really bad guy down there in the Quantum Realm, but I'm not telling anyone"-Mentality from Janet. Makes no sense at all.
Loved Jonathan Majors as Kang.
It's an entertaining fantasy movie, but didn't feel very Ant-Man-y. Could also have been the Guardians or any Avengers crew or even the rebel alliance.
It was... okay.
The humor was overall pretty cringey and Kathryn Newton's acting was not good. If they had cut Cassie from the movie I'd be 100% okay with that.
Jonathon Majors was the only redeeming factor, it's frankly disappointing that his introduction into the MCU (movies-wise) was in this film, though it was a great performance from him.
Marvel Cinematic Universe
The Infinity Saga
Phase One
Iron Man (2008) https://trakt.tv/movies/iron-man-2008
The incredible Hulk (2008) https://trakt.tv/movies/the-incredible-hulk-2008
Iron Man 2 (2010) https://trakt.tv/movies/iron-man-2-2010
Thor (2011) https://trakt.tv/movies/thor-2011
Captain America: The First Avenger (2011) https://trakt.tv/movies/captain-america-the-first-avenger-2011
The Avengers (2012) https://trakt.tv/movies/the-avengers-2012
Phase Two
Iron Man 3 (2013) https://trakt.tv/movies/iron-man-3-2013
Thor: The Dark World (2013) https://trakt.tv/movies/thor-the-dark-world-2013
Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014) https://trakt.tv/movies/captain-america-the-winter-soldier-2014
Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) https://trakt.tv/movies/guardians-of-the-galaxy-2014
Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) https://trakt.tv/movies/avengers-age-of-ultron-2015
Ant-Man (2015) https://trakt.tv/movies/ant-man-2015
Phase Three
Captain America: Civil War (2016) https://trakt.tv/movies/captain-america-civil-war-2016
Doctor Strange (2016) https://trakt.tv/movies/doctor-strange-2016
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 (2017) https://trakt.tv/movies/guardians-of-the-galaxy-vol-2-2017
Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017) https://trakt.tv/movies/spider-man-homecoming-2017
Thor: Ragnarok (2017) https://trakt.tv/movies/thor-ragnarok-2017
Black Panther (2018) https://trakt.tv/movies/black-panther-2018
Avengers: Infinity War (2018) https://trakt.tv/movies/avengers-infinity-war-2018
Ant-Man and the Wasp (2018) https://trakt.tv/movies/ant-man-and-the-wasp-2018
Captain Marvel (2019) https://trakt.tv/movies/captain-marvel-2019
Avengers: Endgame (2019) https://trakt.tv/movies/avengers-endgame-2019
Spider-Man: Far From Home (2019) https://trakt.tv/movies/spider-man-far-from-home-2019
Phase Four
Black Widow (2021) https://trakt.tv/movies/black-widow-2021
Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (2021) https://trakt.tv/movies/shang-chi-and-the-legend-of-the-ten-rings-2021
Eternals (2021) https://trakt.tv/movies/eternals-2021
Spider-Man: No Way Home (2021) https://trakt.tv/movies/spider-man-no-way-home-2021
Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022) https://trakt.tv/movies/doctor-strange-in-the-multiverse-of-madness-2022
Thor: Love and Thunder (2022) https://trakt.tv/movies/thor-love-and-thunder-2022
Black Panther: Wakanda Forever (2022) https://trakt.tv/movies/black-panther-wakanda-forever-2022
The Marvels (2023) https://trakt.tv/movies/the-marvels-2023
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 ((2023) https://trakt.tv/movies/guardians-of-the-galaxy-vol-3-2023
Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania (2023) https://trakt.tv/movies/ant-man-and-the-wasp-quantumania-2023
Fantastic Four https://trakt.tv/movies/fantastic-four
Shout by hgramVIP 3BlockedParent2023-02-17T03:03:14Z
DRINK THE OOZE!
Pros:
- Excellent performances
- Delightfully weird. More goop than your average Marvel movie.
- Some of the most stunning visuals I have ever seen.
- The humor in this movie is so utterly stupid and absurd and I love it.
Cons:
- Dialogue which seems to have been written by a twelve year old
- An unnecessarily confusing plot
Personally, I think this is the best Marvel movie since No Way Home.
How many holes do you have?