PosterPoster

All Comments about...

Kingsman: The Golden Circle 2017

Kingsman: The Golden Circle can't compete with the original, but it still gives us a bold, action-packed and fun spy movie. The visuals are spectacular and so are the performances, with a great cameo from the fabulous Elton John.

loading replies

As good as the first film? No, not really, but then sequels rarely are. It was big and bold, but the story was a little weak. However, the movie is still very entertaining in parts, and while I perhaps wanted a little more plausibility, it may be that I had unrealistic expectations for a film of this sort. Great action, a delicious turn from Julianne Moore, a rocking soundtrack, and a mincing turn from Keith Allen (what, you expected me to say Elton?), made this a film I will go back to. So not as fresh or as funny as the original, but it could have been a lot worse. And remember, before you have a go at me for giving it a lower rating than others, manners maketh the man!

loading replies

I was really disappointed by this sequel. I enjoyed the first movie as it developed the theme of polishing a diamond in the rough, an unlikely but likeable hero, with wit and clever direction and writing. This second film did the opposite, it celebrated the crass and the writing was bad - there were huge holes in the story lines, and the character arches were undeveloped or fractured by missing/unwritten elements. The heros and villians were silly without comedic intent. The only bright spots were Taron Epstein, Mark Strong and Haille Berry's rapport, and Jeff Bridges. Colin Firth's character was butchered by the writers, Elton John' s part was unnecessary, unexplained and poorly executed, This movie is just BAD, and a waste of time. I give it a 3 (bad) out of 10. [Comedy?, Action, Adventure, Spy}

loading replies

Needed more Channing Tatum. Fine enough, otherwise.

loading replies

This was the WORST movie I've ever seen, since the last worst movie I've ever seen!! What a waste of time. The first movie was great, but this just blew chunks. Stupid "story" and plenty of bad acting. Dropping the F-bomb every other word doesn't make a movie funny or intelligent it just proves the writers have nothing to say. 0/10

loading replies

CG was so cheap that I couldn't just stand it. Absolutely not for me, they went too cheap in many places and I had a nice nap during fighting scenes. I mean c'mon this movie could be lot better. Instead of involving USA culture in here they could involve Ireland for example. I hope next movie will be lot better.

loading replies
6
B32b991ab2B32b991ab2

Shout by FinFan
2018-02-16T20:18:29Z— updated 2018-02-19T00:05:20Z

Not nearly as good as the first one but still entertaining. Maybe a bit too long. Suffers from all the typical sequel problems by trying to outdo its predecessor by overdoing almost everything, by just adding more without adding something new. And Julianne Moore is no SL Jackson. Best thing really was Elton John.

loading replies

Not as good as the first one but keeps you entertained...

loading replies

Entertaining and always fun to watch. Not as great as the first one.

loading replies

There is a fine line between being stylistically over-the-top and coming off as contrived. This one wandered into the latter territory at times (particularly the Statesmen bits), but on the whole, it was a fun ride.

loading replies

In my opinion the first one was far superior, this isn’t a bad movie, it’s just ok.

loading replies

Not as good as the first but entertaining

loading replies

I actually really enjoyed this movie, when I thought it wouldn't be that good. The dialogue reminds me a little of "attack the block" which makes it all the more funny to see the contrast with the supposedly smooth upper class spies. The americans where a bit overdone but aren't they always...? :) Very funny Cameo from Elton John throughout much much swearing and hilarity. Overall I thought this was a great attempt after the first brilliant film.

loading replies

Not as good as the first one, but definitely still worth a watch.

loading replies

Big fan of the first. Sadly this is no match. Too many characters and gross out humour which felt out of place and cheap. Good fight scenes, awful cameos and special effects. Wasted talent.

loading replies

Awesome, Funny, really good movie.
I'm glad we have Henry back, but come on why will they kill Marlin?? He was such an amazing guy. I'm going to miss him.
Agent Tequila was funny and hot.
Let's hope to see more of these agents.

loading replies

So much talent going on before as well as behind the camera, it’s just not funny. The editing and direction enhances the action scenes, it’s funny and you won’t be bored for the running time..I do think some scenes play out a bit too convenient at some points but everyone involved delivers an expertly crafted piece of filmmaking, it’s a blast to watch..! Recommended sequel to the already great first film..!

loading replies

My eyes actually hurt after this movie – I just had to roll my eyes so hard and often because of all the nonsense happening… Just a bad movie with horrible plot similar to the first one…

loading replies

Despite loving the first one, I foundthis installment to be predictable, redundant, and unnecessary. It was so juvenile, a better title would've been "Spy Kid".

loading replies

As other said, it's not as good as the original, but makes bold moves all its own. Have you ever wondered what it'd be like to have Sessions as president instead of Trump? Or Paul Ryan as the kiss-up general, instead of the kiss-up congressman? Now you can find out! With that said, Channing Tatum deserved a bigger role, but boy were Whiskey's fight scenes great. This movie was action-packed, full of permanent consequences, and a somewhat twist ending the president getting impeached for sanctioning millions of deaths, instead of being blindly praised for when the infected people were cured. If you don't want politics, then you might want to be wary of this movie, as the focus is largely on the U.S. executive branch and its response with 'War on drugs'. But, there will be a lot of sad parts, and uplifting parts, and ending is just great for Eggsy!

Expect new gear, new weapons, new agents, and Elton John kicking ass -- and may the 3rd film be just as great.

loading replies

That's how you do a sequel. All the charm and style of the original, whilst expanding the universe in a meaningful way. I do feel slightly for Taron Egerton, since he is the main character but has third billing.

As for the story. A decent enough plot. First one is was tech based, this one drugs, I guess the third will be more straightforward war based? Not sure what angle they can pull for a villain in the third. My only minor criticism is how easily they discovered Poppy's compound but that's about it. Original villains, great concepts and fantastic visuals make this a memorable adventure.

loading replies

still good, but without the initial surprise, I think the level goes down a bit. Colin Firth's take it out of his sleeve

loading replies

Unfortunately not quite as good as the first film, but has plenty of fun action. Some characters deserved better, though.

loading replies
8
A1592cdb9d9ee6234f9079f6010998f7?d=https%3a%2f%2fwalter.trakt.tv%2fhotlink ok%2fplaceholders%2fmedium%2fzoidbergA1592cdb9d9ee6234f9079f6010998f7?d=https%3a%2f%2fwalter.trakt.tv%2fhotlink ok%2fplaceholders%2fmedium%2fzoidberg

Shout by Antoine De Schrijver
2017-09-23T09:05:37Z— updated 2017-10-23T12:15:35Z

After the huge success of the first movie, I was afraid this would just be a stupid money-grabbing sequel. But it's not. I really enjoyed it. I highly recommend watching it in theaters.

loading replies

Well It tops the first, strong has whisky, and a strong cast and so better with It's action, humour, gadgets, CGI, and sound track, also a special guest playing himself made the film so much better.

loading replies

oh boy, Elton John is funny !

loading replies

It's not so great as the first film, but still watchable.

loading replies

Will be waiting for the third movie of this same title. Awesome night because of this.

loading replies

awesome movie but the first one is the best one
but still amazing

loading replies

The first one is so good and creative, but this one is boring and not even fun to watch.

loading replies

...surprisingly good and entertaining, hope to have another sequel...

loading replies

Thus movie was an utter can of trash

loading replies
4
E7cbf1f5c8E7cbf1f5c8

Shout by Attila Marics
2018-03-29T15:10:45Z— updated 2019-03-13T01:20:33Z

Boring, uninteresting, dull, etc. I think the kingsman movies are for 6 years old autists.

loading replies

Not the same excellence as the first one. Not as funny, not as violent, and the effects seem cheaper.

Does this make Kingsman: The Golden Circle a bad movie?!?

Not really...

Since the comedy is of the same "low" variety as the first one, it has at least some of what the first one had. It might not be on the same level of greatness as the first Kingsman, but it's a fun 2 hours.

If you like this kind of "over-the-top" action and black comedy this might be right down your alley...

loading replies

country roooaad, take me hooomee

loading replies

Unlike popular opinions I prefer this to the original :D Its funny and entertaining.

loading replies

Kingsman. El círculo de oro

loading replies

Moins bien que le « 1 »... mais divertissant quand même

loading replies

Weird story. Reminds me of Bond movies of the 60s. BUT, great acting, great action scenes which means awesome movie.

Minor annoyances where the sentimental nonsense scenes which ended in, oh, yes, you are right, that was stupid. But that was minor.

loading replies

I enjoyed it...ok for a sequel

loading replies

Nearly held my attention on a number of occasions.

loading replies

The first was a blast with the over the top action still being enjoyable. Kingsman 2, however, is just Bollywood at this point. I was hyped to watch this but instead fell asleep before it even finished. Shame that the sequel was such a disappointment.

loading replies

A little long, but a total blast, like the first. Fun, ridiculous comic book/spy action. Feels like a movie version of James Bond Jr. Love the addition of the American characters.

loading replies

It would way too positive to say that this sequel is a second rate offering compared to the first. The first Kingsman blended action with good acting, a good script, credible characters and good effects providing an all round enjoyable, if completely unbelievable, movie.

With Golden Circle, for some reason they thought it would be a good idea to adapt the storyline to blend in some Cockney barrow-boy (the word BOY really needs to be emphasised) spiv with a penchant for saying f**k and 'bruv' every 5 minutes as the lead character. A bizarre character who seems to swing from being a switched on savvy, highly trained and educated spy to a 'do ya 'fink I'm 'fick or wot?" playground teen' who'd be more at home playing someone's recalcitrant brat in an episode of East Enders. For what reason exactly? It's not charming, funny or clever and seems to serve no purpose whatsoever. All it serves to do is to make the appearance of the male lead actor in 'juvenile prat' mode something to be dreaded and endured rather than enjoyed. CRAP!

loading replies

23 jump street is not the same without Jonah Hill

loading replies

Would give 8, but gains one point for the camera during fights. No other movie was this good this year, at least.
Also no forced gay or racial equity - such a rare thing these days! So you know what? It is a 10.

loading replies

1 / 2 directing & technical aspect
1 / 1 story
1 / 1 act I
1 / 1 act II
0 / 1 act III
1 / 1 acting
1 / 1 writing
0 / 1 originality
0 / 1 lasting ability to make you think
+0 misc

6 out of 10

loading replies

Overall I would rate this equally as the first one, just as excellent.
However, this one hasn't the horrible acting of Samuel L. Jackson, which made the first movie extremely hard to watch.
I still don't know if he did that on purpose, as he usually is a great actor.
Anyhow, because of that, this deserves a very worthy 9 out of 10, as it's a genuinely fantastic action-comedy.

loading replies

A solid sequel, but relied too heavily on references to the first one. (The best reference to the first one was the "backstage pass" line.) Aside from that, too many leaps in logic, and Whiskey's lightsaber lasso was just too bizarre. Otherwise, lots of fun.

loading replies

Too. Much. CGI. Even worse: Too much bad CGI. Half the movie looked computer animated.

loading replies

‘’Manners maketh man’’ that’s all I have to say .

loading replies

It's a great movie in my opinion. Matthew Vaughn is really visionary with his fight and action scenes. The moving camera in direction and angle of the motion plus the perfect fluid and discreet cuts which gives the action scenes the appearance of a one take establish a fluid and dynamic picture. This fact and the bright coloring cause a comic asthetic. The action choreos, stunt scenes and gadgets fit perfect in.

I also like the meet of noble british Kingsman and the rooted in the soil american Statesman. I only see the movie in german tongue, so i don't get the different accents. I will watch in OV too because i think the accents could be hilarious.

loading replies

Waiting for a good quality HD upload in English to watch :)

loading replies

Entertaining, great action scenes and on-point humor. Not as good as the first of course, mainly because Samuel L. Jackson did such a great job as villain and I didn`t commit as much to Poppy, and some scenes were so aburd even for a kingsman movie. All for all, it was worth the watch.

loading replies

Not as good as the first. Did the best I could, given what the first film left. Great action scenes again.

loading replies

where do you watch? tried to log into android to activate and no place to add code.

loading replies
Loading...