7

Shout by Jim222001
VIP
6
BlockedParent2015-09-20T05:47:43Z— updated 2016-09-30T02:27:38Z

Anakin going from a overly cheerful kid in Phantom Menace to a whiny moody and creepy emo doesn't exactly work. Yet I don't get the hate for this film nevertheless. The arena battle scene is exciting and fun. Obi Wan vs Jango Fett is also a under-rated scene.
While we finally got to see Yoda kick some ass even if that scene is pretty silly. No one ever expected Yoda to be as fast as Sonic the Hedgehog.
I think what gets the hate for this one; is the romance scenes between Padme and Anakin. The lines are awful in those scenes and there's a lack of chemistry. Still, I choose Attack of the Clones over Phantom Menace any day.

loading replies

I had great hopes for Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones after the let down of Episode I. I thought that it would get better but it ended up being even worse.

I was expecting to see how Anakin Skywalker developed his training and how he finally became a Jedi. I guess that would have been interesting to see. George Lucas was more concerned about creating one of the worst love stories in cinema! Anakin and Padmé's love story seems so forced! Their scenes together were supposed to be romantic but in fact they bored me a lot. Also their dialogues, well all dialogues in the film are absolutely terrible!

Hayden Christensen and Natalie Portman had no chemistry! Ewan McGregor and Natalie Portman are two great actors but this plot couldn't do nothing for their performances, poor guys. Hayden Christensen is just bad, very bad. They should have chosen another actor to play the role.

Yoda is still awesome!

loading replies

I definitely think this is the worst of the prequels. Way too much whiny Anakin. It has some good moments, and it sets up The Clone Wars TV series very well, but there's just so much crap to wade through.

loading replies

anakin skywalker a.k.a the worst bodyguard in the universe

loading replies

Mediocrity at its finest. I miss the old practical effects.

loading replies

3 Thoughts After Watching ‘Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones’:

  1. The Yoda/Dooku battle fuels my soul.
  2. This might be my least fave film of the series. That may change after I watch ‘Rogue One’ or ‘Solo’. Maybe not.
  3. Is it just me, or is it kinda hard to follow the politics of this whole prequel trilogy?
loading replies

I'm really glad, I had good advice and started with the Original Trilogy. After Episode II, I most definitely would have given up on this series.

loading replies

Nothing gets me more hot and bothered then when I'm on a romantic picnic with a guy at a scenic waterfall retreat and he tells me he supports a fascist regime.

loading replies

What kind of red flags need to happen for Padme to be like, maybe this isn't the guy I thought he was? Wiping out an entire population doesn't seem to phaze her. But then again, she's sleeping with a guy she kind of was babysitting at one point.

Some weird shit happening in Star Wars

loading replies

Has a few effective performances, a magnificent musical score and some impressive visuals, but nothing more beyond that. The storyline is all over the place, characters are lifeless and stiltedly-acted, the action ranges from too mundane to too over-choreographed, the effects work is distractingly fake throughout the entire movie, the dialogue is clunky and often over explains stuff, and the romance is an absolute travesty. The only thing it has above The Phantom Menace is less screen time for jar jar.

loading replies

I genuinly dont know if the people that say they like the prequels is being serious. Like they seem genuine and when they explain it seems like they are explaining fucking 2001: a space oddysey, or the shinning or any terrence malick film. Yet no, they are talking about the prequels

Made with the soly intent of money, money and money.
Was it necesary to explain the past of one of the greatest villains of cinema?
No
Was it well explained?
No
Did it made sense?
No
Was making yoda a fucking bounce ball important, did it add anything, was it good?
Dont quote me on it, but no
Did the love story was good?
No
I could go on but i think you get the point.
Even as a star wars fan i cant reccomend it.
You can like it, but dont bullshit me saying is good.

loading replies

I liked it better than the first one. I found the battles more interesting, the clone battle and the sable fights against Count Dooku, magnificently interpreted by Christopher Lee. I liked the action, the plot, the intrigues and the plot twist that created for next movies. For SW fans of course it was not a plot twist because the knew exactly what would come, but as a whole story I think it works great.

I didn't like the visual effects though, I found them cartoon-like and some characters seem exactly like cartoons.

Music is great as always but I think it is better used in this movie than in the previous one.

I had rated it 5 but now that I saw it again I changed to 7. Not taking Lee's performance into account, none of the actors are more than OK.

loading replies

This movie was miles better than Episode 1 in my opinion, it was more action-packed and I found the story a lot more interesting than Episode 1. It still has a few bits of dialogue that can be a bit janky but overall the righting and directing is better in this film.

Also, I think that the acting is better in this film as well, but the CGI can be a little suspect at points almost reassembling a video game and not a movie. I recommend this one over Episode 1 any day and I think Star Wars fans and filmgoers alike need to give this one a second chance as the addition of the clone plot and also exploring the dark side more made this a really interesting watch.

loading replies
7

Shout by Katnerys
BlockedParent2018-09-17T21:25:39Z— updated 2019-01-09T16:33:05Z

There are two storylines : one boring and one interesting. I don't like the love story in this one because it's not done well, the lines are ridiculous and the acting is bad. I prefer when we follow Obi-Wan's investigation which is more exhilarating.

loading replies

I save this movie because of Obi wan and Yoda. Poor Natalie Portman, such a good actress in an cringy-romance with hayden aka Emo Anakin

loading replies

buy it: great story, visually sexy, great action scene, i rewatch it at least once a yesr

loading replies

Shout by Agata
VIP
2
BlockedParentSpoilers2014-05-15T11:37:19Z

I don't like sand. It's coarse and rough and irritating and it gets everywhere.
I wish I could just..wish away my feelings.

loading replies

I remember seeing this when it came out, I was 11 and when Yoda came out to fight Dooku I burst into laughter. I don't know why I thought it was so funny but Yoda jumping around like that is still hilarious to me.

Pretty good third act but the movie is brought down a lot by the "love story". The Obi-Wan finding the clones story line is very interesting but they keep going back to Anakin and Padme and it just kills the fun. And boy did I forget how whiny Hayden Christensen was. Probably the worst Star Wars but still a decent movie.

loading replies

Lucas continues his epically bad Star Wars prequel trilogy with Episode II – Attack of the Clones. The story kicks into high gear as the Galactic Senate takes up a bill to form an Army of the Republic. Yes, it’s that exciting. With Hayden Christensen in the lead, the acting gets even worse than it was in Episode I. But that’s not all, the CGI effects are horrendously awful too. However, Lucas does ramp up the action and dials back Jar Jar Binks to a minimal role. And despite its many, many flaws, a lot of the film is pretty entertaining in one way or another. Attack of the Clones is a poorly made film that’s painful to watch, but like any car wreck it’s hard to look away.

loading replies
7

Shout by Cash
BlockedParent2022-02-08T12:27:40Z— updated 2022-06-03T11:34:48Z

Basically Ani just acts like a right dickhead the whole film

loading replies

Better, much much better then episode one.

loading replies

Qui Gon Jinn Would Never Join You

loading replies

Episode II is marginally better than Episode I...and that's mostly down to the lack of Gungans. Everything else continues in this mess of a story started with Episode I.

...and OH MY GOD how incredibly whiny Hayden Christensen is. I know the character is probably written that way, but Jesus Christ does he do a good job being a whiny little bastard.

...and the person responsible for that farce of a romantic interlude should be shot...or at least been made to watch those sequences over and over.

The rest (the little that is left) was good. The action was decent, and the sound design made my home theatre system work for a living. The actors still seem uninterested, but who cares when we get lightsabre dancing.

Attack of the Clones is no good movie by far but shows a little bit more promise than the first one did.

The sad thing is I have to get through these travesties that are the prequel trilogies every damn time I rewatch the series...

loading replies

It’s okay. Not the best, the first episode was a bit better than this. Although Anakin was a very good boy, him being arrogant after a few years seems off character. Rude, envious, a character that doesn’t fit him. Acting and the actors/actresses were great but a very boring bland storyline. 5.

loading replies

It's an excellent movie, entertaining from start to finish. The subtle romance between Anakin and Padme left you begging for more. It was the perfect amount of romance without interfering with the movie's flow. I enjoyed the film and would recommend!

loading replies

i fucking love star wars

loading replies

You can tell George Lucas is getting better at making movies, but this movie still has many issues.

loading replies

Even though “Attack of the Clones,"  apart from a completely ineffective romance, doesn't have as many low points as Episode I, it's still the “Star Wars” film that I like the least. In contrast to its direct predecessor,there are no standout moments, such as the Darth Maul fight. Perhaps the chase at the beginning and the revelation of all the Jedi on Geonosis are alright. And the movie at least makes you want to see more about the Clone Wars, but all in all, that's not nearly enough to make it a good movie.

loading replies

Attack of the Clones is an improvement in some ways over The Phantom Menace, but in other ways it got worse. I have nostalgia for this one as well, so it again gets some extra points. 6.5/10 :star:

loading replies

8/10
Great
Definitely the better episode,
Much more interesting and a better pacing, and past all that annoying tantrums BS from
Baby Hitler and if you can grind
through all that soppy cringe
love palaver between
Padmè and baby Hitler
The payoff sure is worth it and that alone makes this episode one of my favourites.
As soon as that purple glow
and "This Party's Over"
Boom kick-off
man I love the kickoff.
This episode has aged
much better than e1
and is far more entertaining
You just have to look
past baby Hitler and his
moods,love and it's not fair
BS.

loading replies

Attack of the Clones is a notable improvement over its predecessor, The Phantom Menace, and offers more insight into the beginnings of the Star Wars saga. The movie delves deeper into the history of the Jedi, exploring their role in the galaxy and their relationship with the emerging Republic. The addition of new characters, such as the bounty hunter Jango Fett, adds an extra layer of depth to the story. Attack of the Clones is a step in the right direction for the prequel trilogy.

loading replies

"Victory? Victory you say? Master Obi-Wan, not victory. The shroud of the dark side has fallen. Begun the Clone War has."

Even after watching this for the third time it is still a hot mess in a great universe. Less said the better. Puberty Anakin is just played so annoyingly by Hayden Christensen. And the back and forth between the romance between Padmé and Anakin and Obi-Wan's spy mission doesn't help the pacing in my eyes. But I have sit through what I feel is the worst Star Wars movie. So only the way up from here on out!

Anyway last end positive. We have Christopher Lee and a big battle at the end and did I even spy a child Ahsoka?

loading replies
5

Shout by Deleted

The movie was fair, not bad, nor good. There was no chemistry between most of the actors, not sure if it was the plot causing it or not but the acting was not all that great either between them but it was still star wars thus the fair rating rather then meh

loading replies

THIS ONE IS SO GOOD

but anakin and padmé romance was just ???
people say that anakin is very immature and annoying but he is literally immature, as far as i know he is only 19 in this movie... but I still didn't like his character development in this.
ps: obiwan i love u

loading replies

I still think it's better than the first, but the romance scenes between Padme and Anakin are insufferable and the ones in the robot factory look like a video game

loading replies

I'm just a simple man trying to make my way in the universe.

loading replies

Anakin's development could have been better and I found the way the romance with Padmé was told a little forced. That's it.

loading replies

Anakin was such a whiny, angsty teen it was just pathetic. Honestly, I’m glad he turned over to the dark side because at least he got more interesting.

loading replies
5

Shout by Deleted

I don't like Episode II. It's coarse, rough and irritating. And it gets everywhere

loading replies

Better than 'Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace', though 'Star Wars: Episode II – Attack of the Clones' is again rather underwhelming - if still good on its own merits.

Liam Neeson is missed, with the likes of Ewan McGregor, Natalie Portman, Hayden Christensen and Christopher Lee failing to set the world alight. McGregor does give the best performance of that quartet; Christensen possibly the weakest, though his character's story is probably the most interesting - or its overall arc, at least.

Those onscreen aren't helped by the dialogue, which is very basic and run-of-the-mill. I found the score a little forgettable, even if it's still fun to hear the key pieces of it. The plot is watchable, but I did expect greater storytelling from these two follow-up releases to the original trilogy. The CGI is, marginally, an improvement on this film's predecessor.

loading replies

Better, much much better then episode one.

loading replies
7

Shout by Deleted
BlockedParentSpoilers2020-08-04T13:47:41Z

It's like the first movie, but the special effects are missing, the action is good in the end, that battle between Count Doku, Anakin, Obi Wan and Yoda is very well done, anyway it's exactly like the first one, but it could have been better if would have been explained by Jango Feet and Boba, we don't know much about Count Doku either.
In these films there are many characters but without an explanation of where they come from, what their story is, nothing is explained.

loading replies
6

Shout by mercuriorosso

"It benefits from an increased emphasis on thrilling action, although they're once again undercut by ponderous plot points and underdeveloped characters."

loading replies

That fight in the end was good.

loading replies

honestly c3po, r2d2 and yoda saved the movie

loading replies

Out of all this comes last.

loading replies

I don't even remember what the hell happened in this wife...jumpin around Yoda or Jar Jar? Wait don't tell me!...no, seriously..I don't care and don't wanna know

loading replies
8

Shout by Jabes C Gonzales

Why there are many whining watching this movies? If you don't like the movie, don't watch it.

loading replies

The chemistry between Christensen and Portman doesn't exist, which is unfortunate and bring the movie down a bit, but I still enjoy this. Plenty of fun action sequences, and the clone army story is an interesting premise.

loading replies

Shout by Deleted
BlockedParentSpoilers2017-03-24T22:52:34Z

The first of all It's not bad , The SFX is great, Acting is believable but Christensen.I think plot is more twisted :Romance and etc.
Natalie Portman so dramatic and need mental helps ,I don't understand why? She is one of the Senate and still lost in romantic action???
and finally have a great time.

loading replies

Christensen's acting makes this such a hard watch. Even McGregor wasn't great but I think his performance was at least believable. It was exciting to see the clones knowing what would become. For me, the prequels fulfil my need for more Yoda and more lightsabers so to be honest, that fills that quota. Still an entertaining watch but nothing ground-breaking happens like in the next episode. Except maybe we accept that Anakin's a little shit that doesn't do as he's told!

loading replies
7

Shout by Karin Rosner
VIP
10
BlockedParentSpoilers2015-12-05T23:30:02Z

It's better than "The Phantom Menace", but only by a hair. Hayden Christiansen can't act. I'm convinced that George Lucas can't write dialogue. The plot is deeper, the tone is more adult, the development of worlds and cosmology are more fully fleshed out, but this still doesn't feel like "Star Wars", especially since it begins as a Noir Detective film set in a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away.

loading replies

All around pretty shitty and hilarious that it is miles worse fx than the earlier 70/80s movies. If it wasn't for Yoda or Boba Fett for example being awesome i would've voted way lower!

loading replies

Good action movie with excellent SFX but nothing more (at least that's what I thought after watching it for the fist time).

However after watching it again, I have to say that I begin to like this one more an more!

loading replies

I liked it... Sure there is plot holes but I just choose to look past it.

loading replies
Loading...