"Chow!"
Didn't like it at the cinema, didn't like it again at home. Too much Chow, the jokes don't land that much, again Las Vegas, the scene with Chow eating dog food, not funny at all and it felt to me like all the boys were phoning it in. However John Goodman was the bright light.
If you want to watch one of these films, watch the first one. It's legit funny.
So is this better than the second installment? Yes it is. Is it better than the original? Nowhere near. But you'll still have a great time if you're a fan of the franchise in general. The film's main set piece at Caesars Palace is worth the ticket price alone.
Don't want to sugar coat it: Disappointing. Horrible. Not lots of funny part.
Thanks to Zach entertaining.
I am sorry for the Trilogy.
Part one is gut-shaking Awsome
OMG! This was so bad. No words. Laughter: 0
Waste of time and money.
I’m not entirely sure why this movie is getting so much hate. I do agree that this installment not as good as the first two parts of the trilogy, as some scenes of the movie seem rather contrived (for example the way Zach’s character development is portrayed). Nevertheless, I did enjoy the movie as a whole, especially because of its twists and the humor that spiced up the story. The acting was spot-on as well, especially Ken Jeong as Mr. Chow.
In conclusion, a solid movie, despite the harsh criticism it's getting.
The Hangover Part III isn't a terrible film, but it's certainly the weakest entry in the trilogy. The new setting offers some visual freshness, and Goodman's performance is a highlight. However, the repetitive jokes and the predictable plot points leave you feeling like you've seen it all before.
I hadn't seen this movie since its release and it was really much better than I remembered.
Instead of doing a more or less exact copy of the first movie in a different country, it goes a completely different route while still having connections to the first movie.
I laughed quite a few times, maybe it's because I was expecting something way worse but I was pleasantly surprised rewatching this movie.
Mr. Chow: "Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't know you worked for PETA. What a pussy!"
Truer words have never been spoken .... :rofl:
"Could you not spit inside my minivan, please? Jesus!"
Wow, this film is hated. It's because it was the least funny one in the trilogy, I'm guessing? I suppose there's some truth to that. Although not to the point of hating it as much as plenty of people do/have.
With the first two, the similarities seemed to be the main problem for people; now, you have the final film in the trilogy, it's different, and people lose their minds. I know those two examples don't go hand in hand, but I find it interesting that the prominent problem people had was changed, and people ignored it to use something else as a substitute to hate this film the most; and that something is (?) how it wasn't as funny. All you had to do was say you're incapable of enjoying films.
If that's why the majority hated this film, I think it's ridiculous. Yes, it could've been funnier, but the EXTREME hate is/was unwarranted. You don't know how to enjoy a film that isn't by no means horrible/terrible/awful/dreadful/appalling/abysmal/atrocious/laughable/pathetic/unbearable/intolerable/insufferable, all of which many would probably use to describe it. I can't imagine how you view films that are.
As usual, the cinematography by Lawrence Sher and the soundtrack was great. Even the score by Christophe Beck was surprisingly good, and I say 'surprisingly' because I don't remember the scores in the previous two films sticking out. That's probably due to the more serious tone.
I prefer the soundtrack of the second film the most, with the first film's soundtrack as a close second, or more so tied, with maybe the first film's soundtrack in the lead by a centimeter, but this film's soundtrack is right behind them. And the cinematography was better in the first two as well, but again, this film's cinematography was right behind.
I liked how the story this time was different, as that was an aspect of the second film that somewhat impacted it; even more so, I liked how it wasn't random; the writers circled back to the previous films. They could've done something new, as in 'different,' instead of intertwining this film's story by adding to the other films, but they didn't, and I respect that.
As far as I'm (and my opinions of this film) are concerned, I enjoyed it. I think it was better, or at least more enjoyable, than the second film, which, now that I think about it, was somewhat weak, despite the typical elements (cinematography, soundtrack) being great. That made me think of it in higher regard, but overall, the second film was a little too ambitious, as well as with the Bangkok setting, which didn't pay off as well as it could've, and this film was better. It wasn't as great as the first film, the OG, which is undoubtedly the best of the trilogy across the board. It was still great, though.
Furthermore, the ending, with the song ('Dark Fantasy' by Kanye), including the flashbacks, made me feel some way; "In the Air Tonight" by Phil Collins during the end credits had the same impact. Without knowing it until now, I guess I became attached to these films and their characters. I want more. Even though this was a fitting end to this trilogy, I want a fourth film.
This third one was the best, hands down. I guess I prefer seeing a story unfold with a bit more stability. I was so goddamn pleased to not see a montage of ridiculous, cringey photos at the end. People keep complaining that there was no hangover in this one, but there was! It's just post credits and it's perfect there for the finale!
The Wolf-Pack its ending this trilogy, the final movie was very good.
Todd Philips is to blame for this :poop:.
Chow and Alan made this worth a watch if it weren’t for them I would’ve skipped this
i did not realize that the nard dog was stu until i finished watching the office i feel so stupid
Less lazy plot wise than part 2 but was still no good reason why there were 3 Hangover movies. Chow is at his most annoying too in the 3rd. I don't remember many funny moments.
Just moments that seemed more cruel than funny, like Alan causing his dad to die of a heart attack and not giving a shit. Or Chow killing chickens and dogs. Plus Black Doug (Mike Epps) is even shot to death. While Stu is as whiny and annoying as ever.
It's not as bad as every one want's it to look like
It was decent
A darker and more violent sequel with Chow (Ken Jeong), more annoying than ever. With the cast even more wasted than they were in the first sequel.
Much weaker than the two others. Two extra hearts for the N.I.B. scene.
Weak.....but no so bad. The 1st is the best the other are not of the same level.
Not really interesting. At best a movie to play in the background when having beer with friends.
They forgot the hangover part ...
Funny and good ending
Buena movie pero mejor las 2 anteriores.
terrible, or maybe i just watched some no-joke edition?
This was just terrible. The funniest and only funny part in the whole movie was the scene after the credits.
I can feel it in the air tonight.... again, the third time ;)
Why call it a "hangover" WHEN NOBODY HAD ONE TO BEGIN WITH!?! This movie was nothing more then a cheap cash in, I can't believe the actors actually agreed on reprising their roles on such a weak script!!!
Agreed it was better than part 2 :)
Better than part 2..but part 1 still made me laugh the most.
BTW, WAIT FOR THE EXTRA SCENE AFTER THE CREDITS START ROLLING!!
The first part was better, but this one still had its funny moments.
SO MUCH BETTER THAN PART 2
Shout by Calum ScottBlockedParent2013-10-18T02:20:47Z
Reviews made me pass on this film, finally watched it and it was decent. Great end to this weird ass trilogy. Loved the post-credits scene too, hilarious and a nice nod to previous films.
Like seriously, this film is much better than everyone else is making it out to be.