This turned out worse than it should have but maybe it's that SyFy thing. There is hardly a plot in this and plays more like an extended TV pilot except that it actually should have been a sequel to a damn good vampire movie. Also there are not one but three kidnappings in the first half hour... so diverse!
Catching up before it's leaving Shudder. Probably the most unengaging post apopcalyptic film I've seen in my entire life. No kidding. It does everything the first already did but this time around it's much more bland, repetitive, non-sensical with less budget. Mostly this film feels kind of meandering and doesn't really have anything to offer. I couldn't connect with any characters. The action parts are mostly shot in the dark it's nearly impossible to see what's happening. Overall it's just another unnecessary follow-up that nobody asked for. Hopefully there will be no The Stakelandest.
The original Stake Land was a breath of fresh air in the fetid landscape of the myriad vampire films that saturated the viewing choices at the time. It wasn't the slickest or best made film you have ever seen but it wore it's heart on its sleeve and it tried something original with the genre Vampirism was disease turning its victims into unthinking monsters that mostly came out at night like some bastardised version of zombies. But it was interesting and fun.
Having and end but being sort of open-ended the film could have been set up for a sequel and in 2016 along came one. Connor Paolo and Nick Damici returned in the likeable roles of Martin and Mister and away we went.
The film portrays through flashbacks the gaps between the events of this film and the last and does a good job of world building using great locations to show abandoned America with only the hardy, insane or infected left alive. Conor Paolo slips back into his role of Martin with some ease and is a good central presence throughout the film although it has to be said some of the support acting slips up and down on that scale albeit they are not helped by some hokey script too.
Stake Land II while not a bad film certainly has a strong first film to compare to and unfortunately in this regard it fails. The story, although classic in so many genres, is slight and seems a far too simple reason for the whole reason for the sequel. For me though, the worst aspect was the disjointed story, it was hard to follow exactly what was going on and in particular the Mad Max style 'Thunderdome' fighting area part of the film made little sense and seemed to had a huge part of the progression missing or edited out.
Further to this, on the DVD I had the music seemed to be set at volume 10 whilst the dialogue was volume 3 meaning that deft hand on the remote control was needed and the final climatic battle took place in pitch black meaning that lots of what was occurring was nearly unwatchable as there was lots of screaming, grunts and crashes that made little of no sense as shadows jittered about in front of me.
Overall Stake Land II was a disappointment after the hugely enjoyable first film. I would have loved to have seen what became of Martin and Mister made into an exciting and maybe original adventure but too much of this film was dabbing into bits from a film here and a film there and the longer the story moved along the more drab and dull it became.
Shame but sequels often fail to live up to their promise. Time to stake this Stake Land through the heart and move on.
Not a bad sequel, but the franchise should probably have a stake put through its heart before it turns stale.
Shout by Carlos Fernando IbarraBlockedParent2017-02-18T10:43:37Z
Pretty rad little sequel. Not as good as the first of course, but considering the resources they had, this turned out pretty well. Further fleshes out the mythology and has a great ending. There shouldn't have been a sequel in the first place, but since there is, what more are you looking for...?