Painful, Sad, Bad, poorly acted, poorly directed, airships really ?
This has to be the worst attempt at adapting Dumas' novel, and god know there were bad ones out there.
I give it a 3 on account of the photography and decors, which lets be honest, are really good. But that can't save that movie which was 1 hour and 50 minutes of my life wasted.
Mads Mikkelsen can do so much better.
Classic ending! Well I was entertained.
In fact, I enjoyed it very much. 8.5/10 for me.
I think it was suppose to be a bit silly.
I gave this bluray away when I saw James Cordon appear.
I really enjoyed the movie. The action scenes were great, and the special effects were pretty sweet to look at. The story line however, it felt a little weak and it could have been better. Nonetheless, I was still entertained. A good watch.
Pretty bad movie actually. I've nothing against silly action-esque movies. But here, it's not silly, it's just dumb.
Action scenes where not that great, the jokes are SO predictable. Even the "over the top gadgets" don't work. On Wild Wild West, it was almost credible but here ...
I don't understand why this movie is talked about in such a negative manner here. Its more of a kids movie, obviously. But a very well executed one.
'The Three Musketeers' is a fun time.
I must really like this story, given I rated and similarly enjoyed the 1993 version from Stephen Herek and Disney - I even put this one above that one! This 2011 version starts off so strongly, I love the opening few scenes... humour and editing was right up my street.
Now, it admittedly doesn't quite keep such a high footing throughout, but all in all I certainly found entertainment with this. For the '93 release I was split on the cast, but for this flick I had a good time watching everyone onscreen. I didn't think Matthew Macfadyen would work in this sorta role but he performs astutely.
Ray Stevenson and Luke Evans join Macfadyen in portraying the titular trio, again to positive effect. The famous D'Artagnan is performed by Logan Lerman here and I was impressed - a top performance from someone I hadn't seen much of before, aside from in 'Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief'.
As for the rest of the cast, Mads Mikkelsen, Milla Jovovich and Orlando Bloom spearhead the rest well. I will say that Freddie Fox and his character's part of the story didn't interest me as much but Fox is fine. Christoph Waltz is involved alongside Fox and is very forgettable... quite a frustrating use of Waltz's (incredibly high) talents, now I think about it. Elsewhere, James Corden is iffy... and I usually like Corden as an actor.
I haven't looked at the average rating as of typing this sentence, but I presume it'll be rather low. It is sometimes easy to spot films that won't have scored well online. As per usual, each to one's own opinion. I personally had a happy experience with this and would definitely rewatch it if the opportunity arose.
Movie couldnt be saved even with one of the best character actors today. Only movie worst than Robin Hood from 2018.
it's a pretty fun time not very time period accurate
if you want some fun energetic charismatic characters along with some fun sword play action check it out
All bang and no flash! This latest adaptation will not be worth remembering and will go down as a half-baked attempt at remaking a movie that has been made too many times. In my book, the 1973 version still rules!
Really terrible movie, but there was a hint of entertainment here and there and I thought the King was funny.
I never enjoyed this movie, was pretty boring
Didn't like it. Too cliche-y, the actors were meh and the King wasn't funny at all.
Shout by Pussay PatrolBlockedParent2012-02-10T09:02:09Z
Have they started working on the sequel?