"The defence is arguing, that the complaintant attacked the accused because she gave her mother covid-19"
Did the writer loose track of their own story there? The complaintant is the one who actually DID accuse the defendant on giving her mother covid-19 and is making such allegations to the press as well. The defendant not only got assaulted by the complaintant (which makes the whole case a joke) but also maintains, that she didn't and is damaged by the complaintants slander.
It might be realistic, that the lawyer would deliberately try to sneak that in, but the defense lawyer should definitely reject that statement.
The dialogue should be "... because the complaintant thought(/thinks/believed/believes) she gave her mother covid-19"
3 words which completly change the meaning of a sentence.
Shout by Marc FriedolinVIP 6BlockedParentSpoilers2021-10-10T21:24:34Z
"The defence is arguing, that the complaintant attacked the accused because she gave her mother covid-19"
Did the writer loose track of their own story there?
The complaintant is the one who actually DID accuse the defendant on giving her mother covid-19 and is making such allegations to the press as well. The defendant not only got assaulted by the complaintant (which makes the whole case a joke) but also maintains, that she didn't and is damaged by the complaintants slander.
It might be realistic, that the lawyer would deliberately try to sneak that in, but the defense lawyer should definitely reject that statement.
The dialogue should be "... because the complaintant thought(/thinks/believed/believes) she gave her mother covid-19"
3 words which completly change the meaning of a sentence.