Hum, it's fine, very good, repeat actors from the previous part.
This one in particular, despite having certain mild scares and certain ghost moments, cannot be considered a horror series.
Well, it is a series of love through time, a beautiful and heartbreaking curse of love.
The cast acts well, the premise is good and the series has a precise and somewhat direct plot, although to those who are not used to it, it will seem slow in its first episodes.
It is a series that can be seen and enjoyed, it is better not to compare it with the previous part but you feel a drop in the personalities of the characters, in the terror and in the end.
Enjoyable and recommended series.
when will the gays be happy?????
“You said it was a ghost story. It isn’t… It’s a love story.” Once again, I will remind you that I avoid the horror genre and, consequently, I have written very few reviews of films or media that are considered horror. So, although I was aware of this series (and had avoided it because of its billing as Horror) I came to it because of a Cosmopolitan article, 50 TV COUPLES WHO WILL RESTORE YOUR FAITH IN LOVE, PROMISE. Which circles me back to agreeing with both the Cosmo article and my opening quote by the bride, this is a love story that restores my faith in love. Everything that isn’t a love story is a puzzle, where we take the pieces offered by the writers and try to solve the mysteries of the world they have so deftly designed. I enjoyed the challenge and the relationships of this mystery, which was replete with surprises and devoid of gore. I give this series an 8 (beautifully told) out of 10. [Mysterious Love Story]
10/10
All Gold
Hill House
Bly Manor
Masterpieces
the horror/romance
Phenomenal performances
the captivating stories
the flawless writing/script.
Everything just works
for me and Flanagan is
a god damn genius
with a creative mind
second to none.
Speaking of his mind
I hope he changes it
and decides to do a
Season 3
because what
Flanagan creates
with his stories is art
and something very very
Special and I would
Love to experience more
of that.
Absolutely Incredible.
(I can not praise this
Man's work enough).
I absolutely loved 'The Haunting of Bly Manor.' The seamless combination of horror and romance was captivating. The characters were exceptional, especially the four main ones. Overall, it was a fantastic show that I highly recommend
Repetition is the mother of learning they say. But repetitiveness of Bly manor, well that is a new level. First: we have here few actors from Hill House which is not bad since I am used to this in American Horror Story. Problem is that in this show I didn't like any of these characters. I really like Victoria Pedretti but as Dani, hell no. Dani was damaged and broken person and I'm not talking about her soul. I'm talking about her weird talking, walking and running like she was 10 years in coma and when she woke up she forgot how to do these things. Second: there are repeating scenes. I understand it was kinda necessary but I'm not talking about one scene which appeared two-three times. There was few of them and sometimes it felt like I have seen this at least 20 times.... it started to be so annoying. Third: for example "perfectly splendid" or sentence "She would sleep.. she would wake... she would walk..." I have heard this so many times that I was telling to myself "ok I hope that’s the last time she’s going to say it..." and then she smacked this sentence in to my face AGAIN. We get it! Move on! It was just too much.
Music was great and creepy dark atmosphere too even Bly Manor wasn’t that scary as Hill House. Dialogues, again, too long and boring sometimes. I still hoped for really good ending so it will keep my mind busy when I will finish these series but it didn't happen. Also it wasn't that hard to figure out what was going on. Not saying that I knew everything but too many ghost clichés in here, so you can be one step ahead.
Apart from some actors in common and the fact that it takes places in a haunted house, there is very little in common with Hill House. Almost all its string points disappeared.
What was good in Hill House ?
1⃣ The original storytelling, with the two time periods and mostly character centric episodes.
This time we have a story told by a narrator, inserted into a wedding rehearsal evening. The link between this and the story itself is almost irrelevant, and barely makes sense, mostly because the characters involved do not realize we're talking about them despite a multitude of elements, and because when you see who the narrator is, she actually would have been privy to a tenth of what happened, and there is no way she could have known most of it.
We still have two time periods, but it's just because the characters involved in the past one are dead, and it was just a few months before.
The character centric episodes are mostly abandoned too.
2⃣ The complex character building.
This time it's very basic. Dani and Henry get a flashback episode backstory. Jamie gets a very long and annoying monologue. Owen has a mother. Hannah likes Owen. Peter gets a 2 minute memory. That's it.
However a good point compared to Hill House, there is also a ghost back story. (Which the narrator couls absolutely not have known, not the part when Viola was alive, even less the part when she was dead.) BUT, it takes a full episode for something that should have been done in half. It ends up being a lot more annoying than useful.
3⃣ The good horror balance.
Well this time apart from Viola's 2 intervention, that is not really horror. There is some haunting and possession (by Peter and Rebecca), some creepy dolls and doll house at the very beginning, but that's all. In Hill House the relatively low horror content was not important because the story and characters were great, here it's more of an issue.
4⃣ The mix between real supernatural and character's delusions.
This time we still have that, but what worked beautifully in Hill House is mostly disappointing here.
Henry's evil twin ghost was brilliantly absent in the end. This probably means it was just an alcohol induced internal demon, but really what was the point of introducing this concept so late to make nothing of it ?
On the opposite hand, Dani's ghost, which seems to be only in her head too, as it never interacts with anybody she just sees it seems to be a major plot in the beginning, and is very quickly abandoned for nothing. Such a shame.
5⃣ Some very original ideas.
At least there are some too here.
Like said earlier, the ghost background story episode that was missing in Hill House is done here. Though it's a bit slow and long.
Hannah's episode has a good concept and narrative structure, BUT, like the viola one, it should have been made shorter. Still, its conclusion, ending at the very moment Dani arrives on the ground, showing she was distracted because she literally died, became a ghost, and forgot about it seconds ago, great.
There is an actual explanation (whether you like it or not) of why people that die in the house stay trapped there. Which is usually missing from every movie/show using the concept. I'm looking at you AHS season 1 and 5.
Same as Hill House, the background ghosts are present, sometimes less in the background. But same as Hill House, apart from Viola they are basically irrelevant.
The ghosts, or the possessed, getting tucked away in memories is a good concept that gives good scenes between dream and flashbacks and introspection.
Now independently from the comparison to Hill House.
A strong point was, surprisingly, the children. Flora is a perfect mix of cute and weird and annoying. While Miles is wonderfully creepy in all the scenes he acts much older than his age.
Still there are a lot more problems.
Shouldn't there be a lot more ghosts ? Viola didn't kill that many, and centuries passed between her and the Wingraves. It even was a plague treatment center, lots of people must have died here. And unless the manor was left empty for generations, nobody else was killed or saw her or any of the other ghosts during all this time ?
What ghosts can and can't do is pretty inconsistent. Hannah clearly interacts with objects and people at some points. What Peter learned from other ghosts, where does it come from. We've pretty much seen that the other ghosts have forgotten even themselves and can't communicate. What is used for ghosts to possess someone, is also used at the end to force a Viola to drop what she was doing and possess Dani ??
The Dani + Jamie relationship is hinted very strongly at the very beginning. Then is barely given any screen time until it's the only thing left in the last 2/3 of the last episode. Who cares by then ?
And so the last episode is very bad. Giving a pretty poor conclusion to a cliffhanger scene that we've been shown no less than 4 times by then ! Then we switch to a never-ending almost unrelated epilogue that could have been done in 2 minutes.
Overall the slowness and length of things is a constant. Even for the good parts, they last and last and last way longer than they should. Hannah's episode. Viola's one. Peter convincing the children. Jamie's monologue. The epilogue. Just to cite those where you're actually checking the time during the scenes wondering when it will end.
Hill house was extraordinary with a mildly disappointing conclusion. Bly manor was lukewarm with some good points but also a lot of too long and too slow moments (or whole episodes) until a shit ending.
Mike Flanagan really loves sad lesbians
That was perfectly splendid with memorable characters and storyline
It's passable. Mostly just a tedious story of an abusive relationship. It's not terrible it's just not that interesting. Ghosts and silly people.
Horror story evolves into a romantic one. It is a good show.
Such a touching story...I rarely cry, watching something, but some moments brought tears to my eyes. Don't treat this series as horror, because it's barely scary, and you'll enjoy it very much
I really enjoy Mike Flanagan but this one was a very slow moving series that leans very heavily into the category of drama.
Enjoyable but not as scary or as good as Hill House. Also they, frustratingly, both suffer from weak endings. I'd be interested in seeing a third iteration but if they do that I really hope they bring in some writers who can stick a good finale.
Netflix follows up their hit haunted house series The Haunting of Hill House with The Haunting of Bly Manor. Based on the works of Henry James, the story follows an au pair who’s hired to care for two orphaned children at a mansion in the English countryside, but grows concerned when a mysterious man appears and the children start behaving strangely. Several of the cast members from Hill House return as different characters, and it follows the same basic structure; switching between two time periods and focusing each episode on a character. However, the series ends up being more about a lesbian romance than a haunting, and the directing is rather weak. Still, the mystery of Bly Manor is fairly interesting and has some creepy, frightening moments. The Haunting of Bly Manor isn’t as good as Hill House, but it’s a decent enough series.
Really liked hill manor but this new serie bly manor, really disliked how things turned out and the explanation of it...
A genuinely awful butchering of Henry James' work. Not all the actors are terrible, but most are. You have some genuinely creepy ideas but stitched together by awful dialogue and woke-isms. I went to see who'd written it... and was suddenly struck by the realisation that this series has one of the most blatant author self-inserts I've ever seen. Honestly... I took to fast forwarding through lots of it.
Most people do not understand this season. Enjoy it for what it is instead of what it isn't.
Here we go again... No it's not scary. Didn't like the acting, too. Anyways, not terrible, but don't call this "horror".
Shout by LunaivyVIP 4BlockedParent2021-02-15T13:44:10Z
My fave gothic romance story and love the soundtrack too. "This not a ghost story, this is a love story".