Pulaski is the Jar Jar Binks of the Star Trek universe. No doubt about that.

loading replies

Shout by FinFan
BlockedParent2019-01-02T21:59:56Z— updated 2019-02-24T11:16:58Z

Picard displayed a lot of discomfort at the beginning while he talked about Dr. Pulaski with Troi. I see no apperent reason why this should be the case. I have to admit that when I saw this episode on the original run I somewhat wished that they wouldn't solve this problem because I never liked Pulaski and this episdoe is a good example why not.
Now, If I remember it correctly, the character was brought on the show to get closer to the big three of the original series between Kirk, Spock and McCoy. She even inherited some trademarks of McCoy like his transporter phobia and his pestered remarks with Spock (in the case of Pulaski that would be with Data). The difference being, that between McCoy and Spock you could always tell one respected the other, while Pulaski seemed to reject Data. Also McCoy could be very stubborn, too, with Pulaski it never really worked the way the producers wanted it.

On a different toppic: did O'Brien ever gave back his officers patent ? He was a Lieutenant on board the Enterprise but "just" the chief engineer on DS9 without any rank.

loading replies

This episode has some of the flimsiest science of any Star Trek episode ever… reversing aging using DNA and the transporter? Doctor exposing herself to potentially fatal disease that they don't understand? Then Picard brings her back onto the ship in an attempt to save her and doesn't use any of the precautions he insisted on before?

plus a gaping plot hole in that I thought genetic engineering was outlawed in the Federation cf Khan and later Bashir and crew? You might argue Dr Kingsley's group was operating outside of the Federation but then why were they being supplied by a Starfleet vessel?

loading replies

Shout by JasperKazai
VIP
2
BlockedParentSpoilers2024-03-20T05:37:58Z— updated 2024-03-21T06:25:44Z

Ehh... the teleporters are already basically magic anyways, so sure, let's make them be able to do even more nonsensical things.
I've always viewed Star Trek teleporters as a practical means to an end, rather than anything else. Back in the 60s, it would've been far too expensive and difficult to show a shuttle leaving the Enterprise and landing on different planets. So, they had this magical teleporter plot device to explain how the characters can just appear on planets (or vice versa, characters appearing on the Enterprise), and that justifies them simply placing the actors in the set. And then once teleporters existed in the canon, they had to keep using them.

It's far from the biggest plot hole, but - why didn't they use the DNA they have on file in Starfleet to do the same reverse-DNA-swap thing on the dead Lantree crew? It's already been established that Star Trek medicine is capable of reviving people from death in certain situations. Surely if the dead crew were returned to their previously healthy state, they could be revived?

loading replies

Killing all the people on the ship at the end of the episode seems like a crime against humanity. Also, wasn't genetic engineering outlawed?

loading replies
6

Shout by Alexander von Limberg
BlockedParent2023-03-27T07:03:20Z— updated 2023-03-30T07:55:42Z

It's like TOS' The Deadly Years. Another episode that explores a concept that I just don't buy and that is hard to execute: make-up is hard to get right and – as we have already found out in TNG's first season episode Too short a Season – it' difficult to play old people. It's also an episode about DNA manipulation. That's at least a relevant issue and bumps up the ranking a bit. Overall, it's another medicore episode, because that's a recycled theme from the classic Star Trek canon w/o adding anything of substance. On one hand the solution to the problem is sci-fi at its best, on the other hand it's so far-fetched that it ruins the ending. If they could do this, you just need a sample of your "younger self" and you can "transport your youth back"?

Am I now supposed to like Pulaski? I still don't like her. Some say she's a strong and brave woman with an opinion. I say: she's a social nightmare and deserves not be liked. Especially Data should hate her if he were capable to.

loading replies

This episode was okay. I liked the problem and the race to a solution. It was a tad quick. My main issue is genetics. I may be new to Trek history but I can always count on the comments here when I think of a franchise wide slap in the face such as genetically engineering people. After DS9 I know that was apparently forbidden so what is this? Are those Drs not starfleet?

loading replies

They wanted to do another beach that makes you old episode but they only had the budget to make one actor old

loading replies

Idc how hot Pulaski was on TOS.. She needs some serious gorilla tape over that gob now.

loading replies

I think it is an interesting concept, that has been hinted at in other programs, however I think it was done well in the vain of the aptitude of Dr. Pulaski. As I wrote earlier, the concept is one that I think will be explored throughout time, and then reexplored from the opposite side of the lense when genetic engineering does actually happen in humans. It is a cautionary tale of maybe genetic engineering might not be the way or maybe it is....

loading replies

Such a well done episode this one. Active immune systems; seek and destroy those bacteria! What a terrible mistake!!

loading replies
Loading...