Spider-Man 2002

Amen to that! Maguire was amazing!

@finfan it's 2019, now, and I still can't agree more.

@finfan Big disagree with that. Maguire is a cartoon. His acting is not great in either role, but he especially lacks the attitude Spider-man should have when in the costume. His Peter is slightly more tolerable, but it feels like a popular kid wrote a story about what he thinks being unpopular is like.

Andrew Garfield handled both parts of the performance much better imo.

I'm not a huge fan of the way the Tom Holland character was handled either, but at least his performance was more believable than Maguire's as well.

@finfan its only been rebooted once and tom is better

@captainandrew It's all a matter of personal taste.

Technically the first live action Spiderman was Nicholas Hammond way back in 1977 but this was straight to TV if I remember correct. There also was a Japanes Spiderman Version in 1978 but that's a whole other thing.
Sam Raimi did this series with Maguire and Marc Webb did two movies with Andrew Garfield. That counts as a re-boot for me. Than came the current version with Tom Holland (next re-boot) which I don't like for the fact that Spidey has become a bit too much Iron-Man like with a talking suit and the ability to fly and do stuff. That simply isn't Spiderman for me.

But, like I said. Personal view. I respect your opinion that you Like Holland better. Thanks for the reply.

@morphinapg Like I mentioned in my reply to captainandrew, it all comes down to personal taste. I understand your argument and I liked the version with Garfield a hell lot more than the current one, that's for sure.

Thanks for the reply.