The worst Scooby film I've ever watched. Pretty bad when I can call the bad-guy from the opening scene.
With the crappiest "action" sequence ever put on film. I actually think the director thought they could just fix it in post.
this is hot trash. actresses are good, but the story line, plot, whatever, other than Jeffery and Gilman, this movie truly sucks.
If you don't think about it as another Scooby Doo movie, but as a trashy version of the universe there's lots to like about it. BTW. Vela is a whole ass mood and I love it!
Velma and Daphne are online friends. So when Velma avoids Daphne when Daphne transfers to Velma’s school. Daphne is wondering why.
Surprisingly entertaining. People here just like to hand out 1-5 reviews lol. Sarah Jeffery (Charmed, Descendants) and Sarah Gilman have good chemistry as Daphne and Velma.
Who are trying to figure out what’s making smart kids, dumb. Nothing Oscar worthy but cute and harmless. It’s perfectly kooky.
I've been a fan of Scooby-Doo for over two decades. Ever since a family member introduced me to it just as I was finishing fourth grade, I've enjoyed "those meddling kids" in various forms: television shows, movies (both animated and live-action), books, comics, and even a soundtrack on audio cassette. For the first two years or so after getting into it, I was known--for good or for ill--for being a big fan of the franchise.
When I heard that they were making a movie that told the origin story of Daphne and Velma, it sounded like something worth checking out; while Scooby may have been the most popular character, I liked the whole gang (well, except shark-jumper Scrappy.) The fact that the two leads were played by Sarah Gilman (I Didn't Do It) and Sarah Hyland (Geek Charming) only sweetened the deal.
However, I barely started it when I considered giving up on it; even though I didn't, it didn't get any better. If this was supposed to be the early days of two teenaged characters who first appeared in 1969, then, why do they have modern conveniences, not to mention technology that seems like something out of Spider-Man 2099? As much as I like Brian Stepanek (The Suite Life of Zack and Cody), he was just plain stupid here; I wonder how he felt playing such an inane role. Also, this movie betrays its "G" rating; while there's no profanity or sexual content, the scariness--which is more intense than anything in the old-school Where Are You! cartoons, partly due to the live-action setting--should have earned a "PG," and is likely to frighten youngsters, even ones who have seen the original show.
I do have to give the makers credit; they didn't decide to add drug references ("What's your name?" "Mary Jane." "Like, that is my favorite name!"), occultic plot devices, or profanity like they did in the first live-action flick featuring "those meddling kids". Still, just like in the case of the Mystery Incorporated cartoon, I think this is an insult to the legacy of Hanna and Barbera; they were likely turning in their graves at the release of this butchering of their most popular creation.
I wasn't expecting too much from this movie since I saw first trailer but wanted to check it anyway. It's bad but because I expected it I'm not that much disappointed if it makes any sense. Actors were bad but I kinda liked this Velma anyway. Daphne was.. well I didn't like Daphne. But it could be really worse. If you're fan yes check this movie but don't expect too much and you'll be fine.
Shout by emilyBlockedParent2019-01-18T17:02:43Z
Is this gay?
I'm only watching if it's gay