The original movie is way better.Check out Christopher Lee in a skirt!!!
This wasn't nearly as bad as I was expecting it to be.
Only watch it if you want to laugh at Nicholas Cage's bad acting as he's violently killed by a crazy cult.
If ever a film never needed remaking it's the 1973 original The Wicker Man. Nods are made to the director & star if the original. The MAIN reason for viewing this though is Nicolas Cage's bravura performance as the unwitting 'hero' for Summer's Isle.
The theatrical cut of this movie is crazy enough as is… but if you're looking for maximum meme-age, try to get the unrated cut… for the bees.
“No! Not the bees! Not the bees!” Nicolas Cage stars in Neil LaBute’s remake of the cult horror film The Wicker Man. When California patrolman Edward Malus receives a letter from his former fiancée asking for help finding her missing daughter he flies out to a remove private island to investigate, and comes to believe that a feminist cult has abducted the child to be a pagan sacrifice. Unfortunately, the storytelling is just awful and does a terrible job at building intrigue and suspense. Malus is continually stonewalled at every turn, which is extremely boring to watch. Additionally, the performances are all pretty bland, except for Cage who goes really over-the-top. Complete garbage, The Wicker Man is an incredible dull film that doesn’t deliver any scares.
"How'd it get burned? How'd it get burned?! How'd it get burned?! How'd it get burned?!"
What an odd and puzzling film. I genuinely think I've sacrificed some of my brain cells by choosing to watch this but in a weirdly good way. I'm not sure whether Nicolas Cage's involvement in a film has the writer(s) change it accordingly to fit him or if his choice of movies is always ones that seem so original.
Still, it's impressive how both films of his I've seen so far, Vampire's Kiss and this one, have such a peculiar identity and feel to them that you're not going to get elsewhere, not even films you've never heard of with barely a budget. Yet, at the same time, it's hard to tell whether that's because of his involvement (subtly, as he's not the director or writer) or if his film choices are genius. And that's so fascinating.
Thank God for Nicolas Cage for caring about acting instead of caring (more) about his image/reputation like mostly every other actor, especially those highly regarded. Thanks to that, he's pumping out all kinds of roles in all types of films while other actors micromanage their acting careers and the roles/films they choose. So what if most of his movies don't have super high budgets with highly regarded directors and writers? He's keeping cinema alive, regardless of how you feel about most of his films, and everyone is oblivious.
Based on this film's consensus, most people hated it, thinking it was one of the worst films ever, and I'm at a loss. I guess that it's mainly due to how it's a remake, especially of a well-received film. That has to be at least 90% of it, as aspects of the film were good.
For example, the budget wasn't that low, so the overall production value was solid. Quite solid, even: the island locations looked great. As an extension of that, the cinematography by Paul Sarossy was good. The score by Angelo Badalamenti was even better; by far one of the best aspects of the film and reminiscent of Brian Tyler's score for Law Abiding Citizen with an eldritch-esque twist. The themes of isolation and indoctrination, as well as the general eerie and sinister tone, were quite effective. And, of course, Nicolas Cage's performance was good: there were also a few signature moments of Nicolas Cage-esque outbursts that he does so well, which is probably intentionally included in his films now, akin to Tom Cruise and his efficiency at running; the other acting performances, particularly by Molly Parker and Kate Beahan, as well as Ellen Burstyn, were good as well.
When it comes down to this film and Vampire's Kiss, the only Nicolas Cage films I've seen, both are pretty much the same, more or less, regarding objectivity. Based on audience reception, they're not even comparable. Most people detest this film, while the reception toward Vampire's Kiss was more evened out or mostly enjoyed, to an extent. My outlook is that I found the latter significantly more enjoyable. However, I also found this film enjoyable. I think its hate is excessive. I don't think this was a bad film.
Midsommar on Wish.
This is when I knew I'd tuned into the wrong movie:
Sister Christian: You're a California Highway Patrolman, you have no authority here in Washington!
Nic Cagey: A CHILD IS MISSING SO IT'S IMPORTANT!
Sister Christian: Oh, OK then.
:person_facepalming_tone2::male_sign:
I just watched this movie but the infamous not the bees scene wasn't included :/
Shout by MaxBlockedParent2017-06-06T11:13:22Z
It is always so hart for me to rate such movies... If you want serious thriller, then it is utterly bad... As for the laughs with beer - one of the funniest movies ever!