Jimmy knows now he only destroyed a copy and not the original tape (it's not evidence per se anymore and can argue with the board he didn't destroy evidence), meanwhile he got photos of Chuck's house (thanks Mike!) and I think he'll try to depict a narrative where Chuck is crazy and a danger to himself and he only tried to help his brother - even going as far as confessing to a crime we didn't do to make Chuck feel better. Basically, he can only be accused of breaking and entering to a point where he can argue wasn't with a malicious intent. Everything said and done, Chuck could potentially be also facing disbarment. Maybe they both lose the privilege to practice law or maybe just one.

loading replies

1 reply

@nmiguelcosta I think you've nailed it. I also see this somehow workng out that Jimmy isn't able to use the name "McGill" anymore. Either Chuck argues that he doesn't want the confusion of name association or somehow the board rules that "Jimmy McGill" is no longer able to practice law, but there's a a loophole allowing Jimmy to change his name.

Loading...