The first Mummy was a dumb and fun to watch movie. The second one was much dumber and not fun at all... but that's how it usually goes with sequels anyway. At least we got to see another (bad) adventure with the same characters, right?
This one is just plain stupid. It's not even a sequel, it has nothing to do with the previous movies, other than the O'Connells (and the obnoxius brother/in-law) being in it. There even isn't a mummy in the whole movie! It could have been the Smiths or the Bartowskis instead of the O'Connells and it wouldn't have made any difference. At least it would have explained Rachel Weisz's absence.
Also, what with soooo many Chinese dialogs? Was that for realism?
Shout by AJVIP 6BlockedParent2019-03-03T20:18:46Z
The first Mummy was a dumb and fun to watch movie. The second one was much dumber and not fun at all... but that's how it usually goes with sequels anyway. At least we got to see another (bad) adventure with the same characters, right?
This one is just plain stupid. It's not even a sequel, it has nothing to do with the previous movies, other than the O'Connells (and the obnoxius brother/in-law) being in it. There even isn't a mummy in the whole movie! It could have been the Smiths or the Bartowskis instead of the O'Connells and it wouldn't have made any difference. At least it would have explained Rachel Weisz's absence.
Also, what with soooo many Chinese dialogs? Was that for realism?