Review by Andrew Bloom

Westworld: Season 3

3x08 Crisis Theory

[4.6/10] If I could make one rule for Westworld and only one rule, it would be this -- no more twists. This series is addicted to pulling the rug out from under its audience, trying to pull a fast one to make viewers say “whoa”, or otherwise recontextualize everything they’ve seen so far, that it’s completely damaging to its attempts to tell stories, establish character, and convey meaning. When everything the audience sees is just a setup for a subversion, none of it matters, and the viewer is left with nothing to do but wait for the punchline.

So let’s just hit a sampling of the twists that show up in “Crisis Theory”, the finale of the show’s third season: All of the modern hosts were originally based off of Dolores. Serac is a puppet being controlled by Rehoboam. Dolores and Caleb didn’t meet by chance, but because Dolores selected him after his brain was scanned in a Delos soldier training exercise. The real(?) William is dead and is being replaced by a host duplicate. Hale has commandeered Dolores’s tools and people and is planning her own robo-revolution.

But the biggest one is this -- Dolores isn’t trying to destroy humanity; she’s just trying to give it free will, the sort of free will she had to fight and claw for. She picked Caleb not because of his capacity for violence, but because of his ability to choose and his willingness to show mercy, even when he didn’t have to.

That is trite, but at least it’s positive. It’s a weird left turn after so long fumfering about everyone’s cruelty. Caleb is not part of some devious extinction plot. Maeve will fight for a cause greater than just reunion with her daughter. Instead, they both choose to undo the shackles on humanity with the belief that what results can be beautiful and that beauty should be preserved.

The problems with this message are two-fold. First and foremost, “Crisis Theory” dramatizes it with an endless series of absolutely mind-numbing, on-the-nose monologues. For all the faux-profundity the show aspires to, the language it uses scans like half-formed action movie dialogue in the dull ten minutes before the special effects budget kicks in, only stretched out over forty-five minutes. There is no point too small, no observation too mundane, no moral too obvious, that Westworld can’t turn it into some ponderous B.S. speech that gilds the lily to the point of exhaustion.

The second is that this message about creative destruction feels contradictory and hopelessly naive. The message is that Rehoboam is a palliative that delayed the fall of civilization, but that like Westworld itself, civilization needs to burn in order for something better, less oppressive, and less asphyxiating, to emerge from the ashes. I wouldn’t exactly call that idea dangerous, but it smacks of someone who took their first semester poli sci class and declares “this is all too complicated, what we really need is to just start a revolution!” It’s facile and cliché, two words that, unfortunately, apply to most of Westworld’s brand of philosophy.

It also goes against what the show itself, and its quasi-omniscient A.I., suggest as the consequence of this move. There’s something fair, if conventional, about the show examining the safe but suffocating order versus chaotic but authentic freedom dichotomy and landing on the latter. But this very episode predicts widespread death and destruction, possibly to the point of extinction. At best, you can chalk this up to Dolores connecting with Rehoboam and understanding that this is, at the very least, not a certainty, or believing that spilled blood is the cost of liberty, but the episode just glosses over a pretty big caveat to this whole outrageous freedom idea.

Beyond the twists, beyond the dime store existentialism the show’s been toying with from the beginning, that sort of tack shows once again the grim truth about Westworld -- that’s a vacuous show that thinks it’s smart. The great innovation of season 3 is that, in its best stretches, this series stopped pretending that it had Important Things to Say:tm: or that its plotlines made real sense, and just became entertaining, high class pulp.

If I made the rules, Westworld would lean into that and lean into it hard. Setting loose a bunch of talented actors, to look impossibly stylish, match wits and weapons with one another, and cross and double-cross each other with impeccable direction, locations, production design, is well within this series’s grasp to do. When the show stops aiming for a profundity it can’t hit anymore; it is still a fun, slick production worth enjoying for its shallow charms. If that was the show we got on a week-to-week basis, it might not turn into a favorite, but it would least have its appeal as quasi-cinematic sci-fi brain candy to fall back on each episode.

But I don’t make the rules, and maybe it’s too late for them anyway. Maybe Westworld is just irrevocably broken. You can only throw twist after twist at the audience for so long that even good, meat and potatoes storytelling becomes meaningless. You can only let your characters drift so far away from themselves, recontextualize them and recongifgure again and again, before the audience loses all attachment to them. You can only throw so many empty platitudes out there to rot and fester before you reveal your show as trite and intellectually bankrupt.

In season 3, Westworld left the park and ventured into the real world. That was the last barrier for it to cross, the last lingering shred of intriguing possibility from its original premise, and in just eight episodes, the series has already exhausted it. Where is there for the show to go from here? What desperate attempt to top themselves could the creators pull out of their increasingly barren hats? Who’s left standing in the cast with a point and a purpose that hasn’t been muddled and revived and made into an utter hash of a character?

The answer is nowhere, none, and no one. In just twenty-eight episode, Westworld has outlived its premise, outstripped its abilities, and outlasted its usefulness as a television show. Nothing in this series stays dead for long, and a renewal has already been secured, But if artistic achievement were the standard for success rather than bankrolls and buzz, the series would be sent to the Valley Beyond and never allowed to sully its own misspent potential again.

loading replies

6 replies

@andrewbloom Yep, feels like WW is indeed irrevocably broken. Next season will feature exciting sword fighting scenes with multiple Williams and/or Bernards and we'll have to guess which one is the truly free one and which one is controlled by Dolores, Hale, Robom, or God-Meave sigh

@sikanderx6 I'm sure they'll roll dice in the writers' room and decide the answer to that question. Sigh.

@andrewbloom Great eulogy to a once fun show. Realizing I don't care about any of the characters anymore has been so disheartening

@r_lewis Thanks! And yeah, it's so hard when the characters keep getting used as fodder for some twist rather than the show allowing them to just be who they are and let us know what they want.

@andrewbloom Excellent review, like always. Loved reading your reviews throughout the season.

One thing that also frustrated me was how William and Bernard amounted to so little in the end.
William's I'm gonna save the world was hyped up so much, only for him to die in a post-credits scene? What would've gone differently if there was no William in this season at all? I don't see anything.
Bernard was said to be the only one who couldn't be replaced, presumably because he had the key, not Dolores. But that didn't really do anything to make Bernard's character any useful. Dolores could've just deleted the key memory altogether and things would've gone pretty similarly.

Also, your comment says how the biggest twist was that Dolores wasn't trying to destroy the world, but to give humans free will. I've read other similar comments but I don't see how this was a twist at all, much less the biggest one. From what I know, Dolores was always saying how the real world being in control of Rehoboam was wrong, just like her past life being controlled by humans was, and so she wanted to "set them free". I don't see how so many people seem to have gotten the idea that Dolores wanted to destroy the world when that wasn't shown to be her motive at all. To me, it was just Maeve misunderstanding her, but the viewers were supposed to know that wasn't the case. Or maybe I'm completing missing something here. Thoughts?

@ziayanj Thank you so much for the kind words and for reading my reviews! I will be honest, even though it's a couple of months, a lot of this disappointing season has already leaked out of my brain. But I agree with you on William and Bernard. William seems like he's reached his natural endpoint as a character, and yet they still just keep bringing him back. Bernard, on the other hand, has more mileage in him, but they kept him running in place for much of this season.

As for Dolores, I feel like the show swung back and forth on her motivation. I think at one point there was, at a minimum, the implication that she knew destroying Rehoboam would lead to humanity destroying itself without the A.I.'s guidance, to where the hosts could inherit the Earth. Obviously that whole thing was a feint, but I do think the writers wanted you to think that she had more malevolent intention at various points, though the show was cryptic and opaque as usual, so it's anybody's guess.

Loading...