just to clarify for anyone planning to watch older episodes of svu—no character, at any point, states that a cisgender man automatically wants to rape a woman. no character, at any point, states that the reason they did not rape a woman was because they were transgender.
summarizing that scene, the dialogue and the writing behind it as anything but a defense lawyer antagonizing a witness on the stand and said witness disclosing their gender identity because of said antagonism is irresponsible, ignorant, and just plain ridiculous.
Shout by hannahBlockedParent2022-04-01T09:51:04Z
just to clarify for anyone planning to watch older episodes of svu—no character, at any point, states that a cisgender man automatically wants to rape a woman. no character, at any point, states that the reason they did not rape a woman was because they were transgender.
summarizing that scene, the dialogue and the writing behind it as anything but a defense lawyer antagonizing a witness on the stand and said witness disclosing their gender identity because of said antagonism is irresponsible, ignorant, and just plain ridiculous.