There is no such thing as vegan propaganda. On the other hand, you have countless ads for meat, milk and all kinds of products based on animals every day on tv, newspapers, radio... If you watched the show you certainly did not get the point.
@angelcosta Are they wrong though? Didn't think much of the series but hard to argue with a lot of what was brought up.
@hanrahan Nope, they most definetely are not. But I was expecting to see an experiment. I feel it was clickbait, that study didn't seem too controlled (sorry, English not my main language).
I agree with the premise, but that seemed a bit too amateur and biased.
@david1979-66c0548d-56d3-432c-a4b4-e312c8718fd6 I meant like it was being pushed too hard. There are some data in there, I know FOR A FACT that science cannot measure yet, but they present it either way.
@david1979-66c0548d-56d3-432c-a4b4-e312c8718fd6 I always find it funny when non-vegans get riled up thinking there's a vast vegan conspiracy: we're not the one with a stake in this, profit or otherwise. Animals have their quality of life and actual lives in the balance, they're the ones hurting the most ethically, and that's who vegans fight for (not money, profit, recognition, etc.).
However, the animal ag industries have a LOT of money riding on continuing to fool people into buying their products, and yet some non-vegans can't possibly recongnize the conflict of interest and profit-motivated bias there.
Shout by Angélica CostaBlockedParent2024-01-03T03:59:41Z— updated 2024-01-04T19:14:45Z
And that, kids, is how you make vegan propaganda.
Edit: And by that I mean that I wanted to see an experiment but they clearly were biased towards methods, data, results, etc.