@turkkildare I didn't see "alive" so I'm not going to comment on whether it is a better or worse movie but the survivors said that they added and changed events and it is not faithful to what really happened, unlike this version in which the survivors had direct participation in its production to the point of having cameos in the film
@pantherzalayeta great, information and post. I recommend viewers watch the original.
@turkkildare Survive!? The movie from 1976? I thought people didn't like it much
Alive! is typical Hollywood bullshit sensationalistic retelling of a true story. Have you even seen this film or are you just being reactionary?
@turkkildare It's the exact opposite of what you are saying. There are interviews of the survivors stating that this one is way more representative of their story than the Hollywood one.
@turkkildare the difference is that what you call the original was written by a person who wasnt in the Ands and the survivors even rejected that version, while this one has been written while the survivors told the story, few of them have been advising during the filming directly to the director, including the appearance of 6 of them in the movie.
@turkkildare Americans being Americans. This is not a remake. And Alive is not THE original.
Shout by Turk KildareBlockedParent2024-01-07T11:08:07Z
Just another reg-urge remake to make a little money on the next generation. The original is much better and this story is the type that can only be told once. ALIVE [1993] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106246/