Review by Deleted

Signs 2002

Review by Deleted

So, where does the movie Signs fit in? Well, it's not quite as good as The Sixth Sense or Unbreakable, but it's not quite as bad as The Happening or The Village or Lady in the Water. It's kind of in the middle. So you watch Signs, and you're like, "Hey, that wasn't... that wasn't as good as the first two. I mean, like, every director has a movie that's not as good as the other ones. But I'm okay with that, maybe their next one will be better." This feels so unbalanced now; the first two movies had this glorification before I started insulting them, but there's really not that much good about this movie at all. Mel Gibson and Joaquin Phoenix did well to play their characters. However, the child actors did not hold up and they were a sore pot for me when watching this movie. There's just so much wrong with this movie, like the fact that aliens invaded a planet with the EXACT liquid compound that covers more than 90% of the earth that could kill them on contact AND did it naked. I don't even feel like talking about all of it. Overall, Not as good as the other ones.

loading replies

1 reply

@mitzle-deleted-1476635645 and you still gave it an 8? :thinking:

Loading...