Uncharted games are all about adventures and thrillers, so far 50 minutes to the movie and it was full of boring dialogues and bad acting. Does any of the casts ever played or even watched the games? I thought it's going to be a good movie and thrilling like the games, but I was wrong so far.
If you thought Da Vinci Code and National Treasure were completely implausible pants, don't watch this.
Well this was disappointing.
I was expecting more from the director of 'Venom' and the writers of 'Transformers: The Last Knight' and 'Men in Black: International'.
Entertaining, and pretty good, but not really special or worth a re-watch.
Rating: 7.5/10
Posted: 27th october 2023
(not really sure why this rating with this comment tbh)
absolute worst casting i've seen in my entire life smh
For a film based on an action video game , I got more than I expected.
Actual character growth. Wow.
Fun movie and what I expected.
To be fair, I've never played Uncharted before so I was going in with no expectations. I was mainly looking for an easy movie to follow to change my mind. amAnd it did that. This movie is clearly not a masterpiece and the plot is predictable but it's a fun ride. It's entertaining.
Finding all that gold and megallens ship just to destroy the ship and loose the gold in twenty minutes must be the worst treasure hunters in the world. Don't they have some ethical code to not destroy the tresure findings :person_facepalming:♂
Someone wrote individual scenes that pay homage to the Uncharted series, and then attempted to weave a narrative that would make sense to showcase them all. As a dumb, shallow action ride, it's OK, but fans of the franchise should steer clear unless they're ok with shoddy, loose interpretations of the thing they love being paraded around on screen to soft effect. Purely passable popcorn cinema, just ok in every single way.
A fine piece of just turn your brain off and enjoy what is being given, also known as: popcorn entertainment cinema. The type of adventure movie that we do not see these too often. A great ride from beginning to end. The end was over the top: definitely. But was it enjoyable: absolutely. Would recommend for a fun time.
The film is ok, typical 2 hour action film.
It just doesn’t feel like uncharted. They crammed elements from all 4 games into 1 film - rather than aiming for 1 film per game as I would’ve liked.
Also, I think Tom Holland is great, but not the right choice for Nathan Drake - he’s far too young.
Same with Mark Wahlberg for Sully.
Very good action. Unfortunately, too little of it.
At least I had fun watching it. I accept Tom Holland for everything by now. He can be the next Arielle for all I care.
One of the worst Australian accents ever, Chloe needs to be recast, appalling
Its overhated
It has a lot of flaws, but its enjoyable
Its actually funny
I love the easter egg with the man on the beach. Its pretty funny if you played the games
Is it just me or one of jo's men looks like Joe the lie detector guy?
Why the hell doesn't somebody just kill Braddock early in the movie. There are several opportunities. Hell, it isn't even necessary to kill her. Victor could have just beat the crap out of her instead of farting around and pretending to put up a fight with an underskilled opponent. He just plays with her while she is trying her best to be effective. He shrugs her off repeatedly and instead of finishing the fight he just wanders off like she doesn't even exist and is of no consequence. It's obvious in every fight that she is no match for her opponents.
She's annoying and obviously out to kill anyone in her way. Kill her first, or at least put her in the hospital for the next month. The second option involves more suffering. I like that one better.
She's not a well written character and is a detriment to the story. She's not entertaining. She has no depth. She is stupid as all get out (who the hell would take several billion dollars and use it as a weapon when it could easily fall into the ocean and be lost... so absolutely insipid). The character has no on screen presence. She is just a waste of screen time. Literally every other character is better. Her minions have more depth and presence than she does.
Off her and improve the rest of the movie.
After seeing this. I wanna play the original game.
Terrific treasure hunt entertainment with exhilarating thrills, chills, super-stunts amidst stunning locales deservingly nurturing every aspect of mystery.
i just hate this movie because it’s just feel like ive seen it before it’s just so basic.
Without playing the game, I could see that the actors appeared to be miscast. Wahlberg and Holland make a good team, if only it was for another film. That being said, Sophia Ali and Banderas, appear more in character to what I imagine the games to be like. Overall, I’d say you wouldn’t be wasting your evening with this adventure, but it’s not off the charts.
8/10
HERE WE GO
I am a massive massive fan of the games,
I've been here from the beginning
with the franchise,
I own them all special editions and
I have bought them all multiple times for
every console release/re-release,
PS3,PS4pro,PS5.
and I play them all multiple times a year and know every word,scene and inch of this
Magnificent Awesome franchise.
In fact I'm actually playing them at the moment,
I'm up to the 4th installment so I would say I
have expert knowledge of this thrilling universe.
First Cons:
I'm not feeling Chloe
at all, she's Amazing frickin awesome in the game
Charming, charismatic
Cool AF and definitely command's and owns every scene she's in
(Chloe even gets her own solo
Uncharted game without
Nate she's that Frickin Awesome,
which is Phenomenal by the way).
The girl Cosplaying her in the movie is just plain unlikeable and I just wasn't feeling
any "Chloe Frazer" in her acting at all,
No not in the slightest.
We need a much better actress to slay the role.
Same for Jo, now she was good and made a decent baddie but she was no
"Nadine Ross" from
Uncharted 4 and
Lost Legacy.
She is a Uber badass
and I mean she can go,
You really don't want to mess with her at all
because she will definitely kick your ass into
next week, are out a window
(Top floor).
Jo from the movie no..just..no, to me she was
The "Wish" version of
Nadine.
Pros: that being said everything else was thrilling and exciting and they definitely did a fantastic job of having the games iconic
set-pieces in there.
Kicking off with the
3rd games set piece
Then into the 4th game
Which they played most
Of this movie out with
Which is ironic because that's how they end the
Uncharted games with the 4th
But kick start the movie franchise
With the body work of the 4th game.
Tom is amazing in any role especially as he does his own stunts
(Wherever he can).
Mark always puts in a
Full solid performance,
love him.
I had concerns about
The casting but by the end of the movie
they both had won me over.
The VFX we're phenomenal, absolutely
Outstanding they definitely
Captured the games
Set Pieces to do them the justice they so rightfully deserve.
There was so many
Nods and Easter eggs
To the games I loved that
So much, even
down to the
Naughty Dog logo
and so many more.
For me this definitely did
what it said on the tin
This was an
Uncharted Movie
and I would not be opposed to the idea of
Some sequels
(Let's have the train
Set piece next from
UC 2 and introduce
Elena Fisher
Nate's future wife
(n mother to his daughter
Cassie).
So much potential can
Come from this
Game-Movie franchise
If handled properly,
This first movie
Was a
Great Start.
Hopefully
Nate Will Return
(Right back to
Playing
UNCHARTED
LEGACY OF THIEVES COLLECTION).
Just another typical treasure hunt movie. A fine time pass for one time!
Wow, I am honestly surprised by how bad the plot and characters are in this film.
As a premise I would like to say that I have no knowledge of the videogame from which this movie is based, so I can't compare the two things. But I can say that this movie is enjoyable only if you are an easily impressionable kid.
So, Uncharted is a fast paced action/adventure, with a clear objective: to find the lost treasure of Magellano.
The main problem comes from how inconsistent the characters are: they don't really have a personality, therefore you never feel an emotional connection with any of them. Also the plot is kinda just sketched: protagonist solves puzzles because he has to, because he is the main character; things seem to happen because they have to happen, so of course the main character will trust the shady dude immediately, and of course he is a prodigious fighter and parkourer and thief, and has a vast knowledged of history and dead tongues (and I have no idea what kind of life this kid has had because the movie never tells us, he is just "good". Oh, he also descends from pirates, so maybe that's the reason, right?!).
The climax that comes from the "emotional" scene of the main character finally finding the treasure (in the most random cave ever, like how can it be that these huge ass ships where not found by any turist exploring the islands?) is cut short in like 5 seconds. Like, the main character doesn't even have time to actually think about his journey, or his brother, or that his brother knew where the treasure was... none of it matters, because they had to make space for action and chases...
Oh yeah, let me rant about the main chase of this film. I'm sure they thought they were making a big, spectacular thing when they came up with two helicopters holding two ancient pirate ships in the air and chasing each other around.
That choice alone turned the whole movie into garbage to me (and it wasn't great to begin with). It was so stupid that I couldn't believe they really did it. The main villain, which is trasporting the pirate ships full of gold to a safe platform over sea, sees that the second ship is being taken away by the "heroes", and so she orders his men to CHASE the ship. Which doesn't mean that some men took another helicopter and chased the ship, no no. It means they used the same helicopter which was transporting the priceless XVII century pirate ship full of gold to chase the other ship. Resulting in both ships getting destroyed and the treasure lost at sea.
Like, what the fuck was that??? Where's the logic? I'm not a fucking mindless puppet watching a screen for two hours and being happy just to see thing go boom and people fighting!I mean, why couldn't the villain just bring the fucking ship she still had to the safe place and chase the other one with the same helicopter later?! It's not like the heroes could have gone that far without fuel, or a base to which land the fucking huge ass ship, or anything! Oh, let me tell you the worst part: this choice came from the same villain which, upon finding the two ships, said to her thugs: "If you damage them I'll blow your heads", or something like that. So much for consistency!
Wait, you want another exemple of inconcistency? Throughout the film every fucking person the protagonist meet tells him that Sully is a bad guy, that he will betray anyone for money, NEVER TRUST HIM. Guess what? He never betrays anyone in the whole movie, and even saves the protagonist. But guess I'll have to believe them on their word!
In conclusion, if you want an adventure film with a lost treasure and lovable characters watch The Mummy (1999) instead, it's still a better choice after 23 years.
2 minutes in, and I see that Tom got some use for his spider skills.
Overall it was alright movie. Not the actors I was expecting to play the Drake and Sully. I really expected a greyhaired oldie to play Sully.
Made me want to replay the games.
It was really beautiful ships and a lovely cat
After years of anticipation, the popular video game series Uncharted has finally been adapted into a feature film, with Tom Holland in the lead role. The film features action and adventure, but neither element is particularly thrilling or engaging. Despite holding my attention, I was not fully invested in the story, as the film comes across as empty and soulless. The attempts at humor and lightheartedness often fall flat and the sense of adventure feels off-key. The third act of the film, which adapts a major sequence from the game, provides some thrills and spectacle, but suffers from illogical leaps. The movie is choppy and lacks a sense of place, given its globe-trotting narrative, which is a missed opportunity to create a grand scale and scope. Tom Holland, Mark Wahlberg, and Antonio Banderas gave performances that lack depth and nuance, particularly Holland and Wahlberg, who seemed hampered by the lackluster script. The film ultimately comes across as generic and underwhelming, reminiscent of 2018's Tomb Raider, but with a hint of a potential for improvement in a sequel.
Después de años de anticipación, la popular serie de videojuegos Uncharted finalmente se ha adaptado a una película, con Tom Holland en el papel principal. La película presenta acción y aventura, pero ninguno de los elementos es particularmente emocionante o atractivo. A pesar de captar mi atención, no estaba completamente involucrado en la historia, ya que la película parece vacía y sin alma. Los intentos de humor y alegría a menudo fracasan y el sentido de la aventura se siente fuera de tono. El tercer acto de la película, que adapta una secuencia importante del juego, ofrece algo de emoción y espectáculo, pero adolece de saltos ilógicos. La película es entrecortada y carece de un sentido de lugar, dada su narrativa de trotamundos, que es una oportunidad perdida para crear una gran escala y alcance. Tom Holland, Mark Wahlberg y Antonio Banderas ofrecieron actuaciones que carecen de profundidad y matices, particularmente Holland y Wahlberg, quienes parecían obstaculizados por el mediocre guión. La película finalmente parece genérica y decepcionante, que recuerda a Tomb Raider de 2018, pero con un indicio de potencial de mejora en una secuela.
It's okay, a sequel could get interesting
Wow, I love this film. Good actors, interesting story and wonderful spots. OK, it’s not a movie which needs the use of your brain but it’s perfect entertainment with excitement and action. And last but not least humor.
It's unfortunate that this got cast in the way that it did, with the right cast this probably could have been a lot stronger. Holland is just basically playing a snarkier Peter Parker here. And I'm not buying the connection that him and Wahlberg share so quickly. It's underdeveloped, but with a couple of actors that shared better chemistry that wouldn't have been a problem. Because aside from that it's a fairly mediocre adventure movie. Lots of big spectacular set pieces, but they're all pretty hollow. It's a fun enough movie, but with better performers (for these roles) it could have been something really solid.
I have never played the underlying games and maybe this is helpful for enjoying the movie when I read the other reviews. Unfortunately, it didn’t really help me. Everything from this film works according to scheme F and that’s what I say about a film in which a fight between two ships takes place in the air. The actors themselves, especially Mark Wahlberg, also seem unimpressed or uncommitted. Enough for a hungover Sunday, but I would still prefer Indian Jones, maybe just try the seemingly very cinematic games or watch a Lets Play.
Bluff after bluff, flip after flip.
Solid. So sad that Rudy Pankow is not gonna play Sam anymore.
Rated it 5 because of Nolan North's cameo. Otherwise, it has nothing of the magic of the Uncharted games. Unfortunately.
Bartender ninja Tom Holland is something I did not know I needed :joy:.
I like Uncharted, but it’s just okay as a movie. As a Nintendo fanboy I’m not familiar with the games, so I went in expecting an Indiana Jones type of adventure. I mean, they even reference it multiple times. I was kind of disappointed that it felt more like National Treasure.
The CGI is really bad at times and that makes it look like a videogame cutscene, which is a bummer. The story is quite mediocre, but that’s the case with most movies of this genre. Just shut your brain off, don’t mind the plot holes and the unsurprising twists, and you’re fine.
I like the dynamic between Mark and Tom, but Nathan Drake feels too much like Peter Parker; a nerdy kid who can do parkour, flips and throws around witty remarks. I don’t know if that’s in line with the games, but it feels off for me.
Still, I had fun with it.
Haven't played the games unfortunately, but am keen on doing it.
Decided to watch the movie without that context and found the plot unbelievable. thinking of that whole mechanism below Barcelona's streets just annoyed me. Otherwise it was imaginative although not explaining much of backstory but leaving the suspense for the next one.
Entertaining, fun, an aerial chase with caravels is a first, made for an entertaining watch if you know what you are getting.
Overall seems like a die hard movie origin story. Flashy, but without much content.
Horrible!! Cast, story, adaptation, cgi, even the acting is lame... Nothing to remember here !!
This is what Hollywood do to one of the best video game franchise! But to be fair, we never saw a good video game adaptation.
All “fans of the game” who say they liked this movie in the comments are so dumb. Even if a movie adaptation can, not to be exactly the same, this movie is so far from the game, that to say it is an adaptation is ridiculous!!
You can like this movie as a Hollywood action movie, but you can't like it as an adaptation of the game!
The 2018 low budget 15min live action fan film with Nathan Fillion & Stephen Lang, directed by Allan Ungar is way better than this crap!
This movie was pretty much what I expected or rather hoped for. It was a fun adventure/action rollercoaster plain and simple. This is one of those, rare nowadays, movies that are meant to entertain plain and simple. Two hours of adventure, action and twists barely held together by a rudimentary story and no woke rubbish or bullshit preaching. The latter is probably what rendered it a 40% rotten “critics” score on woke tomatoes while the audience gave it a 90% fresh score. As almost always a rotten score on woke tomatoes is an indication that it is a movie worthwhile watching.
The story, as can be seen from the movie blurb, is a treasure hunt a la Indiana Jones. It starts off by introducing the main character, Nathan, in a few brief scenes where Nathan bungles up a heist being perpetrated by his brother after which they are involuntarily separated.
Quick forward to present time and the main story takes off with Nathan being persuaded by Sullivan to embark on a hunt for an immeasurable treasure. Not exactly the newest or freshest of stories but if it works don’t fix it.
Pretty much everyone in this movie is a self-centered scoundrel with little to no care for anyone except themselves. Thus the action and treasure hunting is regularly interrupted by twists and betrayals. No one will claim that this movie has an elaborate and intelligent story. It does not have to. It is just meant to hold the action together.
I quite liked the main actors. Sullivan did a good job of being the blasé, self-centered scoundrel, Nathan of being the somewhat naive wannabe treasure hunter and Braddock was quite cool, and sexy (hey, I’m a guy), as the baddie. Antonio Banderas was Antonio Banderas although I was saddened by his premature exit from the hunt.
Overall the action was nice although the scenes in, and out of, the airplane was the usual unrealistic Hollywood action. Although that was overshadowed with the ship carrying helicopter scenes towards the end which was taking unrealism to new levels. But I didn’t really care because it was fun silliness. The moment they started to carry those ships away I started to hope that the writer would go for the silly and obvious stunt involving black powder. Yes unrealistic but there is no denying the coolness factor.
As far as I am concerned this was two hours well spent. The ending scene clearly suggested that the producers hoped to make a sequel. I would definitely watch it but with all the people lamenting the fact that someone dared to make a movie simply for entertainment without a profound (and boring) story or bullshit preaching in it that might not happen. It did make about four times its budget at the box office though so maybe.
Admittedly, I’m biased towards this movie. I love the games. I love the characters. I love the beautiful views. It’s a guilty pleasure experience for me to say the least. Are the characters clones to the game characters? Of course not. Do they mesh together several game story point points? Yep. But it’s a quality video game adaptation and I can’t wait to see more!
Rating: 4.5/5 - 9/10 - Highly Recommend
Sony's first, flashiest attempt to convert one of their best-loved video game franchises into a bonafide event film. They certainly picked the right game for the job, as the Uncharted series has screamed for a big budget adaptation since, basically, day one. It's cinematic gaming turned cinematic, uh, cinema, but as we've lost direct control of the action, a bit of the thrill has also gone.
Tom Holland is plucky and slippery in the leading role, tackling a younger version of Nathan Drake than we've ever seen on the Playstation. He handles (almost) all of his own stunts, of which there are many, and carries himself like a genuine baby-faced action movie star. Mark Wahlberg is his backup, a cagey veteran with connections to the hero's lost brother who introduces Drake to an underground world of globe-trotting, crypt-creeping and riddle-solving. Wahlberg is less convincing and less essential, often playing the part of the obnoxious third wheel, and probably should've been killed off in the second act. Instead, they work as a duo to uncover villainous plots, forge uneasy alliances, withstand double-crosses (oh, so many telegraphed double-crosses in this picture) and crack ancient, complex puzzles whilst dangling from their fingertips.
Despite all this, Uncharted still feels bland and derivative. As the games essentially wear their Indiana Jones inspiration on their sleeve, some imitation is to be expected, but the lessons learnt from those films don't appear to have been the right ones and the newer film pales in comparison to its elder. Indy knew how to pace himself, how to patiently linger in a moment for maximum effect, how to derive tension and suspense from a tough spot. For Holland and Wahlberg, it all comes so easily, so quickly, that it may as well have never happened at all. The fight scenes are particularly rough, loaded with so many abrupt cutaways that it can be difficult to keep up. I get that this is the modern way, slicing up footage like a trailer, but frankly, that sucks. You've got a willing young star right there, we've already bought into him as a physically-capable hero, so why deny us the opportunity to watch him trade blows with the heavies? It's a microcosm of the film as a whole.
On paper, this probably sounded great, but in execution it's flawed and lacks feeling. Too slick, too predictable, too over-produced, too hurried to tease us with scraps and hints about adventures yet to come, at the expense of the here and now. As big, dumb blockbusters go, it's acceptable enough, but that's not exactly a steep bar to clear and in no way does it whet my appetite for a sequel. Which seems to be the beginning and end of these producers' ambitions.
I came into this with no prior knowledge of the video game series and probably for the better. Many reviews I've read from fans of the game are not happy with this film, but I found it fun. Wahlberg and Holland have a great chemistry together and I always love Antonio Banderas, even with the limited screen time he got here. Sophia Ali and Tati Gabrielle, both new names to me, put in strong performances against the 'A' list headliners.
This film felt like a modern Indiana Jones with a touch of Lara Croft all mixed with a Dan Brown novel. At times, I definitely had the sense that I was in a video game world, where the main characters were unlocking puzzles, each one leading to the next, but never in a way that didn't belong.
Judging by the credits scene, there will be more uncharted films to come, I just hope we get to see more of the cat!
To be fair, I did not watch this whole movie (wife and I got about 30 minutes in). I haven't played or heard of the Uncharted games, so I can't compare the movie to the games. What I can compare it to though, is other movies, most of which are surprisingly better. Between the horrible dialog between the 2 main characters and what seems to be a hugely rushed story (at least in the first 30 minutes) I had to stop watching. Because the story seemed so rushed, none of what was going on seemed at all believable. Think Oceans 11 in 20 minutes. The action and "comedy" were pretty bad too. I would not recommend wasting any time with this trash.
Silly, ridiculous, huge plot holes, occasionally cringe worthy dialog and action, and absurd action.
Yet, I found myself enjoying the movie!
The acting, for the most part, was good, with good use of its stars in holland, wahlburget, and banderas.
Great scenery shown off by decent camera work, although some parts were too dark.
All in all, a surprisingly good movie. I rated it a 7 out of 10.
It's really like a 4 but I'm giving it a 6 - in a generous mood, I guess! I put this in a "rating it for what it is" category rather than rating it as a piece of art.
If you watch on autopilot or have it on in the background It's fine, but pay any attention and it becomes quickly apparent that this movie is extremely derivative, beyond nonsensical and very by-the-numbers.
That's not even getting into the way media like this romanticizes colonization and the idea that what was once stolen has somehow been "neutralized" by time to become a game for white settlers to fight over and feel entitled to. They played both sides of the fence on this with the ending.
Not a great movie. Elements of the game were there which was fun. Tom Holland isn’t right for this role but him and Markie Mark have decent chemistry. Even if they couldn’t settle on accents the whole movie.
Straight garbage. A solid attempt at ruining the Uncharted brand
It's ok for a weeknight when there's nothing else to watch.
watched only for tom holland... game is the best but movie was okayish
Some scenes fed my nostalgia a little but that's about it. Story is underwhelming and I didn't like the casting. As a previous commenter said, Nathan Fillion's 14 minute live action short outshines this full feature (near) fail and I really wish that had continued as a tv series.
Just proves what I was thinking before watch this, Nathan Fillion's fan film is way better.
I love the Uncharted game franchise but the movie doesn't really bring anything new or valuable to the table.
It's not that it is bad, it's just bland and easily forgettable.
Oh dear... another game made into a movie - and it sucks.
Completely remove all logic from your brain during the opening credits and this might actually entertain you.
The movie is not without a flaws, but I must say that they managed to create a perfect movie that caters to fans by including some iconic scenes from the games and Easter eggs (Nolan North cameo was a great moment), but at the same time the one that won't be confusing to the newcomers and can be enjoyed even if you've never played the games.
The cast did a decent job, though they are a bit younger than they should have been.
All in all, it was really a fun watch and, as a big fan of the games, I thoroughly enjoyed this. I hope they will make a sequel.
borrrring! the story development is like a bumpy road, and at the end of the road is a cliff. Plus they randomly cast big stars who never fit the roles in the movie. Probably just because those are famous celebrities.
A very soulless adaptation of an amazing series of video games.
What the heck. What's the point of every treasure hunt movie if they never can get the gold for good. & I hate the villain character, Tati Gabrielle, for no reason.
Try not to watch, waste of time. :thumbsdown:
Don't know why, I just hate Tati Gabrielle :thumbsdown:
Some fun banter between the leads, and the action shots can be fun. Overall there is a lot of bad acting though and ofc it's completely ludicrous. I tried hard to like it, and did slightly more than my wife did. Some is too aggressive for kids I guess but then it's too silly for adults. Hard to determine the target demo here. Not sure if those that played the game will like it or not. 5.1 for me
its a meh. underwhelming, at least for me
Obviously owes a lot to Indy 3, but fun action sequences outweigh some weak villains. Good set pieces smell of Indiana Jones and National Treasure, for sure, but the action is handled well and the story just doesn't slow down. Loads of fun.
Pretty straightforward and fun adventure movie, although does not come close to the greats in its genre. Overall it is pretty shallow and Mark and Tom's comedic talents are wasted on the poor jokes, but it still manages to be one of the best video game adaptations ever made. The bar for that is very low of course, but an achievement nonetheless.
Based on the popular video game franchise, Uncharted takes us back to the origins of Nathan Drake's adventures and his quest for treasure.
In the purest Indiana Jones or Tomb Rider style, the film brings us an excellent adventure story for the whole family that, in my opinion, will also delight Spanish audiences. Without going into too much detail, part of the plot is set in Spain and it is done from a very respectful and faithful perspective, without going into the typical clichés that are shown to the world of our land.
Location aside, Uncharted is entertaining, without too many moments to relax and is impeccably guided by the protagonist duo. The action scenes are perhaps overdone, but we've come to see great adventures and to hold our hands over our heads with a smile of surprise.
i literally hate everything that is this movie. Full of so many movie tropes, WTF
Considering that Uncharted is one of my favourite video game series, this movie was painful to watch. Casting was awful, plot was generic and bland, and the few parts that bare any semblance to the video games are done horribly and feel as though they're crammed in just for the sake of making it seem similar to the games. The Nolan North cameo was the only part of the movie that I felt any sort of joy watching.
13 year old me would have killed for an Uncharted movie, and that makes this movie all the more sad and disappointing to me.
I don’t know the games that inspired this movie/franchise, but, then again, the gamers reviews that I read felt the movie didn’t reflect the game. It’s really just a run of the mill, no brainer, action flick, where Tom Holland is adorable (and ripped), Mark Wahlberg plays Mark Wahlberg, the women are beautiful and kick butt, the plot is much ado about nonsense, and it wastes 2 hours relatively easy. I give this film a 6.5 (okay) out of 10 [Action Adventure]
It must be hard to find a worst actor for the part than Wahlberg. The man doesn't even try...
It's Tom's worst movie :type_1_2:♂.. with effect but it bored me in 10 min.
I really enjoyed this movie. Well worth a watch :thumbsup_tone1:
Maybe it's too much to watch a double session with Tom Holland, too soft for my taste, but at least this movie delivers what it promises, as long as you don't expect too much from its promise. Holland and Wahlberg actually work well in this buddy movie, but they are poor representations of Nathan Drake and Victor Sullivan. And the movie feels about as frustrating as watching another guy playing your favorite video game.
That throat cut is one of the cringiest things I've ever seen in a movie. Fuck you and your censorship Sony. Glad I didn't waste money at the theatre on this one.
Mark Wahlberg plays the same character in most films, and the same pretty bad (or the lack of any real) acting in all of them - but he isn't so offensive in that single character to make this a bad movie, just not a great one. This is kind of Indiana Jones meets National Treasure meets Mission Impossible, and if you like those three films then this is worth the watch.
It is trite, predictable and still not the worst way to spend 2 hours of your life.
Overly simplistic and cheap looking
Just turn off your brain and enjoy. That way you will be satisfied :)
I didn't play, so I judge through the prism of an adventure film, and here it is no surprise. Weak mix Indiana Jones with Dan Brown novels.
The only good thing about this movie is Tom Holland shirtless.
Rush story. Joke Tom and Mark are flat. The story is predictable.
Tom Holland is what it has.
A good way to spend a cold and dreary Sunday afternoon. Definitely not going to win any awards but enjoyable and fun.
This is like the last Tomb Raider movie. A perfectly fine movie that you will eventually forget about.
Maybe it’s good for people who had played the game. To me it was confused, it made no sense and it was just a bad copy of the Raiders of the lost Arc
I am now scared that they also ruin the adaptation of Last of us
I … don’t even know where to start. Went into this movie not expecting much … and even then ended up being disappointed.
The script was just horrifically bad, paired with mediocre actors it resulted in poorly delivered lines. Just horrific.
Basically every single scene was predictable and there was no surprise. The CGI was poor—you can actually see the stunt double’s faces …
And what was up with the plot itself? Apart from characters having no depth or development, so many random things happened. There was just no logic to it at all. Even if it is based on a game, this all just did not make any sense.
Worst of all: casting someone from England as the Scotsman—what kind of accent was that supposed to be? Did the casting director read "oh, he’s from the north, that has to be Scotland". Complete and utter failure.
Only nice thing I can say about this movie was hearing Antonio Banderas speak lovely Spanish. At least there they decided to cast native speakers.
Falls flat several times for me then it completely flatlines when they killed off Antonio Banderas' character. At that point, I pretty much stopped caring about anything that happened.
for some reason I feel like I watched another random bad popcorn movie with the Rock. And he's not even in the movie :sweat_smile:
This was a big waste. Remove the casting and the title and nobody would dare to watch this. Holland cannot save a bad script, and walberg didn't even try. I didn't know Ali and felt she was doing a good job, but her character was really one dimensional.
I'd watch a 2 but with really low expectations and only if I had nothing else to watch :sweat_smile:
Just felt so fucking bland, what a waste of an ip.
Mark Wahlbergs acting is subpar next to Tom Holland
Someone should ask Mark about his other video game movie roll, Max Payne
I enjoyed it. Slightly shallow into details and story but overall not bad
I didn't have huge hopes for this, but I certainly thought that it would be better than what was produced. This film was overly done CGI-wise, generic, derivative ("The Goonies" anyone?), and rather uninteresting b/c of the poor pacing of the film. I thought that Sophia Ali and Tom Holland were paired well together, but the script just didn't suit them. Given how the games were designed, they could've done so much more the history and mythology of the storyline that could've made the clue-finding more intriguing, but they failed in this aspect, too. I'd probably watch a sequel, but I wouldn't be very excited about it.
I vividly remember when I first watch the new Tomb Raider movie, and how disappointed I was at how they decided to bring the game(s) to life. It wasn't bad, but it wasn't good neither. It was alright for what it was.
With Uncharted, I've never got around to play the games, but I know how praised they are, and looking at how bare-bones and unfunny the movie was with the characters and the treasure hunt, I can only feel sorry.
That was pleasantly surprising the amount of fun I had. As a fan of the games I found this to be enjoyable turn your :brain: off fun. Looking forward to the potential sequels!
Well, a treasure hunt movie without the Rock? I didn’t think that this is even possible, but I was entertained. It could have been funnier - overall a strong 6, because there have been a lot of shit movies lately and it’s on the upper side.
Filled with plot holes, and absolute trash story. Nowhere near the game. Even uncharted 1 was better.
Not a review just a remark. I was on my phone for over half the movie.
As a BIG fan of the games and the adventure movies it's inspirered by, this was awfully underwhelming. So dissapointed.
a perfect movie for a boring grey day. one thing i dislike is the “other guys” type of conversations.
:heart:x6
Bottom line - it's an entertaining movie. I think most folks will enjoy it for what it is. I was expecting a little more and a little better. There's nothing really here to make this movie stand out from the rest .
How I rate:
1-3 :heart: = seriously! don't waste your time
4-6 :heart: = you may or may not enjoy this
7-8 :heart: = I expect you will like this too
9-10 :heart: = movies and TV shows I really love!
So stupid. Horrible characters and an insane plot. Holland was… fine but everyone else was just horrible especially Wahlberg, Ali and Gabrielle. And what is up with these stupid mid credit scenes? You don’t think there will be a sequel? Do you?
Nothing new, but not a bad movie. There arr couple of cheesey parts, but all in all predictable and entertaining. Must watch!
super!! and not work!!!! excellent cast
Another easy movie. It will entertain you if you do not see the faulty CGIs at extreme scenes or if you do not care about the simple plot. But it is not the worst. It is an OK movie to pass time with sympathetic Tom and Mark. 6.5/10
Fan of the games, and this was a fun ride, if not more! It could've been better for sure..
Review by JordyVIP 8BlockedParent2022-02-11T19:51:16Z— updated 2022-02-21T08:32:26Z
Look, I'm very much in favor of giving directors the creative freedom to put their own spin on whatever they're adapting.
In fact, I think it's quite shallow and close-minded to judge an adaptation against its source material, pretending as if that's meant to be some holy grail of perfection.
That being said: the whole appeal of the Uncharted games in the first place is that they feel like a mix of Indiana Jones and Mission Impossible, with this sassy, horny, shit-talking protagonist at the center of it.
This movie captures neither of those aspects, and replaces them with basic movie tropes.
It doesn't feel like the aforementioned franchises. Instead, it looks and feels like your generic, throwaway action movie that usually stars The Rock (e.g.Rampage, Red Notice, Skyscraper).
Tom Holland plays Spider-man with attitude. He's not playing (a younger version of) Nathan Drake.
Mark Wahlberg plays Mark Wahlberg.
Like, why was this project treated like a tax write-off?
It has everything a Hollywood executive could want: the source material is cinematic, action packed, fun, and best of all: it has a built in audience.
This could've easily been the next big summer franchise if this was given a proper treatment. It should be much easier to get this right than other videogame based adaptations.
So why is Avi Arad producing this? Why is Ruben Fleischer directing this? Why is this script burning through four games of material? Why is the dialogue so clunky and unfunny? Why is the casting so lame? Why does it look like plastic, when the cinematographer of this thing shot Last Night in Soho and Oldboy?
Fuck.
3.5/10