It wasn’t made by national geographic, so clearly it’s all pseudoscience! Just kidding, this is great stuff, very well made. People like jason in the comments, along with archeologists holding on for dear life to the current narrative, are why humanity has very clearly been stuck in the same place for the past century. They will tell you this docuseries is bs, they’ll accuse the creators of cherrypicking (lol, as opposed to what, downright ignoring evidence? Good one) that more evidence is needed, etc. but no funds go towards these projects from the known big players, so they have created and maintained a stalemate, where they (at least in their own minds) have the power to shoot down every attempt that is made to present new evidence. The agenda here should be blatantly obvious to anyone with half a brain. As for the motive, one can only guess. I have my suspicions, but this is not the place to discuss them as far as I’m concerned.
You simply can not say “renowned archeologists/the big players don’t confirm this, so it’s not true!” in a time where none of those “renowned” archeologists nor the big players can even be bother to look into this stuff. Time’s up. Mankind has waiting long enough for these clowns to advance the science, and when they refuse to, God knows why, it’s up to others to push the frontlines. This docuseries does that, in a visually pleasing way. I don’t care that dominant players such as national geographic are not involved in this, they’re clearly invested in preserving the currently established knowledge without expanding on it, so it is up to others to pick up the ball. They can claim pseudoscience all they want, slander from fossils who have long given up on even pretending to be engaged in science, is meaningless. Put you money where your mouth is, and if you can’t be bothered to invest in these projects, stfu and sit back while others do the legwork. Simple.
Highly recommend this series, very good stuff. Deserves the attention.
this series clearly shows what happens when you set out to find evidence that proves what you already think vs form what you think based on the evidence. all the evidence he shows is real but he very much cherry picks evidence that proves his theory while leaving out the stuff that disproves and he flat out lies over and over about those evil archiogists by putting words and beliefs in their mouths that have never been their words or beliefs just to make them sound ignorant. like this stuff about ignoring astronomy. archeologist saying they don't know something yet isn't the same as refusing to consider or believe something, it's saying we don't know yet, as scientists they have an obligation to see verifiable proof. the key point here is to take the hosts own advice and do the leg work ( study) yourself because the more you learn the more his theories sound like b.s.
They classify this as a reality show when it really should be a comedy I have not laughed so hard in a long time time
Mainstream science tell you Graham is a kook. Mainstream science also told you mask stop the spread of covid. Also, a vaccine prevents the spread. Graham has been consistent for decades.
I would describe this as a psychological drama with erotic thriller vibes. Kiernan Shipka steals the show she is magnetising. The episodes are short and overall this feels like a movie. The ending is not that great though especially if they don't plan on a second season.
Everything looks so fake and staged! I kept rolling my eyes lol. However, I like the concept it's interesting and I kept watching. I kinda enjoyed it specially because of the things they use to communicate with the ghosts, they are the same items as the things I use in the game Phasmophobia haha.
I feel like this could have been really good with more context. Some of the episodes, like Dimension or Birth, had a really neat, fully explained premise that would have been really interesting if they had been able to dedicate more time to it. Other episodes like Crack or Curiosity were interesting but lacked all context as to why things were happening, which left me more confused than scared. I think the series relies too heavily on outside knowledge of the urban legends, as well as focusing too much on freaking out the audience without actually being able to do so (apart from maybe Crack, which was the only unsettling episode in the series) over actually telling a story. If you have outside knowledge of Korean urban legends, this might be a better experience.
Its like then best parts of Rhodes to the top with a better presentation.
This nonsense sold as documentary is only bullshit
This man was given a platform by Joe Rogan. The proof that freedom of speech matters. Good serie with a lot lot evidence show. Make of it what you will. Very interesting.
How can this be real when the earth is only 6,000 years old?
I am obviously kidding.
I really wanted to enjoy this, but having someone like Joe Rogan frequency commenting on these theories takes so much away from any validity the archaeologists have.
there are many interesting theories presented, with facts I didn't know, it is an interesting watch (just ignore Joe Rogan's involvement)
Edit: Lowering this down from a 5 to a 3, as I looked into this guy more, and it is an utter shame Netflix let pseudo-science on their show, but it explains Joe Rogan's involvement so much more. To be clear, I am not saying anything he said could not be true, but I call this pseudo-science, as there is no science behind it if you took the Archaeologist, who refuses to allow his work be peer reviewed, solely out of blind faith, which is clouding ALL the ACTUAL science that dispute anything he says.
This was fun to watch, and posed some ideas, but understand that there is absolutely zero proven science to support anything he says, while there are quite a number of things that directly dispute parts of this ideas.
