The language with which both men talked about their families as possessions really stuck out to me. It's what led to one being unable to grieve his dead family and the other being unable to connect to his living family. The ending showed how viewing women as mere set dressing for men's lives ultimately leads to tragedy for not just the disposable women but for the men living in misery and loneliness.
Quite an interesting insight into a scam so elaborate that it could just as easily be a Hollywood film, not a documentary.
Meanwhile, it's quite pathetic how the victim-blaming discussed in the movie continues in the trakt comments
Can't even imagine the emotional and financial damage he inflicted upon so many women. Victim blaming is easy when you haven't been in the shoes of the other person. I'm glad they got their power back in some way, 'cause many of these assholes take advantage of discretion and these women made sure he was known for who he really is: a piece of shit, like one of them said, pathetic, definitely, and a criminal. Whoever's with him now won't be able to say they didn't know what they were getting into.
If you looking for a true-crime doc to watch over Valentines this is it. Starts slow but stick with it by the end it gets crazy. I recommend going in blind .your in for a good time
A new variation on an existing concept. But nicely done. Fits well with other similar shows, like Liar Game (JP or KR), Zero, Kaiji, and others. Can only recommend it.
I noticed one thing. Each time there is a murder game in a Korean show, they focus more on the characters. In Japanese shows, they focus more on the game mechanics. I wonder why it is so.
Good documentary on the tolls fishing is taking on our planet. It's from a different perspective and worth watching.
We've all seen the don't eat meat docs, this one is don't eat fish. We can't all become vegetarians because they'll poison us with the crap they spray on the crops - including organics via chemtrails - check out "What are they spraying"... bottom line...we just have to stop eating. Full stop.
Unfortunately, we can only do our little part and hope everyone joins in, but compared to the greed of big biz and the governments we're screwed anyway.
Some stuff bothered me about how it was made, i.e. those animated cut-scenes. In my opinion these kinds of personal stories are more powerful if you just let the people talk, with no music, no cheesy imagery.
But the overall message was good and it showcases something many people don't see – EVERYTHING is connected. And that is overwhelming at first. But as Sylvia Earle tells us:
"No one can do everything, but every one can do something."
[7.7/10] I always enjoyed games like Werewolves, Mafia, and “Secret Hitler” because I think they expose something in us. They’re fun bits of parlor entertainment, but they also show how easy it is to mistake well-intentioned errors for sabotage, to see enemies where there are only friends, and how the same pieces of evidence, of action, can point in two directions at once. They’re party games, sure, but they’re also subtly an exemplar of the failings of human nature.
“Tinker, Tailor, Demon, Spy” is basically one small game of “Werewolves.” A mysterious figure shows up in The Good Place, says his name is Glen from The Bad Place and, more dramatically, declares that the Michael we know and love is really Vicky in a Michael suit (or at least has been for the last few episodes). Michael, of course, professes his innocence. And the catch is that it’s next to impossible to know whom to believe.
That creates real challenges for Eleanor, Tahani, and Jason. On the one hand, Glen gives good answers to our heroes questions, offering a plausible tale about Shawn bullying him, about constructing the Michael suit, and about witnessing signs of sabotage. On the other, Michael gives some suspicious answers, admitting to lying about his knowledge of the Michael suit and about only pretending to have had a mental breakdown forcing Eleanor to take charge, as well as refusing to shed his human skin.
Still he also has some very reasonable and very Michael reasons for these things. He didn’t want to mess up the experiment. He’s a “fire squid” and doesn't want the group to see him differently. He is, well, flawed in plausible ways, and it makes it hard to know who’s telling the truth and who’s the saboteur?
But what if they’re both telling the truth? What if Glen is right that there’s some skullduggery going on, but has the exact terms of it wrong? And what if Michael is being honest about his insecurities and reasons for fibbing to the group. It ties Eleanor in particular in knots, but the truth turns out to be more complicated.
That’s the thing about games like “Mafia” -- it’s easy to get fixated on a decision between one or two potential turncoats, when the real antagonist of the game is someone who hasn’t even entered the discussion. I love the swerve that the real culprit here is Janet, who’s secretly a Bad Janet that’s been undermining the group since the last train. And even better, I love that they figure it out because Jason knows his girlfriend, and realizes that if he called her “girl” she would inevitably correct him that she’s not a girl. It’s a great way to show Jason being both clever and attentive, and a nice way to give him the win.
I also like Eleanor’s part in all of this. It makes sense that she’s be out of sorts over not knowing who to trust. But she not only gets the reassurance that suffering mightily to make the world a little better is the most Chidi thing in the world, something that confirms the man she loves is still there even if he’s forgotten her, but she gets the reassurance that being willing to sacrifice yourself for the good of this group (or at least be turned into a blue blob for several months) is the most Michael thing in the world. In the end, the lie detector is one of knowing the people you care about.
On top of that, there’s some good comedy in the episode. The appearance of Chidi’s frankenstein drawing of Simone’s pony was a big laugh. Jason’s initial interactions with Glen to try to uncover who’s lying were very funny. And Derek showing up to talk about his and Mindy’s sex toys was ribald but amusing.
Overall, this is an episode with a great premise that finds a nice way to take a left turn at the end, give Jason a victory, and vindicate our heroes’ friendships with one another.
[7.7/10] This is another episode where I really enjoyed just about everything...except the relationship stuff. Once again, the emotional core of the episode is anchored to the relationship between Eleanor and Chidi, which just has yet to click with me, which means the grand climax here leaves me cold.
But that’s the thing -- I really like most everything else about that part of the episode. D’arcy Carden does amazing work at portraying all of her co-stars. The way she’s able to perfectly capture the specific cadences of characters like Jason and Tahani was impressive, to where it’s easy to forget that it’s not really them as Carden delivers the performance. At the same time, the editors and compositors deserve so many kudos for making it feel totally natural that these were all separate characters interacting in a room together and not just one person green-screened over and over again.
I even like the emotional conceit of the episode -- where Eleanor’s identity crisis turns literally inside the confines of Janet’s void, cracking the place up and making Eleanor transform into other people and forget who she is. Chidi trying to bring her back, avoid intimacy by burying himself in philosophy, and realizing that he knows who Eleanor is and cares about her is a strong concept. And hell, I loved the hell out of the visuals the show used to convey Chidi having his epiphany to the point that it brings both of them back to who they really are. I just don’t really see Chidi and Eleanor as an OTP yet, so it lacked some punch for me.
The other half of the episode was both creative and hilarious though. Bringing in Stephen Merchant to play the head accountant is an inspired bit of casting, and the show managed to deliver a lot of exposition on how the point system works in fun and creative ways. (The beleaguered tone of the “weird sex thing” accountant was a consistent set of laughs.) I enjoyed the revelation that no one has made it to The Good Place in 500 years, and the accountant refusing to accept the notion that there’s anything wrong with that, as it speaks to a certain institutional inertia that works for both comedy and drama. Hell, just imagining the nerve center of the afterlife as a beige-lit cubicle farm, replete with a Neutral Janet is pretty inspired.
And I enjoyed the message of that segment to, with Michael realizing that he keeps looking for an external solution to his problems, someone else to take care of them, when really, he needs to look within himself to starting fixing things rather than waiting for it to happen. Of course, that leads us to yet another reboot and tease, but it’s a promising one, as this show gives us more tantalizing territory to explore.
Overall, I’m still a little leery about how much weight the show is putting on an Eleanor/Chidi relationship that I haven’t bought into yet, but the comedy, creativity, and world-building continues to be superb enough to keep me smiling throughout.
So... who died in 1497 and went to the Good Place?
[7.3/10] The A-story of this one was pretty good. I like that the show took the time to have our heroes question why Michael would team up with them, and how they could ever trust him. It leads to some good gags, some leverage, and a lot of good back-and-forths between the characters. On top of that, I like the fact that Chidi wants to do it because it’s true to his ethos of moral self-improvement, and that makes Eleanor willing to do it because she admires, however, begrudgingly, Chidi’s eternal willingness to selflessly help with it. The episode’s heavy-handed on that score, admittedly, but it’s a good setup.
The B-story was less good. I’ve liked Tahani, but the show got really over-the-top in depicting her resentment for her sister. The flashbacks are all fairly cartoony and broad, and don’t fit very naturally into the rest of the proceedings. At the same time, Jason was too dumb even for his usual dimwitted self here, and the show needs to find other places to take the character (like his unexpectedly endearing romance with Janet).
Overall, this felt like a table-setter, or even a little like a bottle episode, but largely delivered something enjoyable.
The Genius is a brilliant game show with engaging challenges that mixes intellect and social skills in order to win the game. The cast is refreshing and vary from different fields (lawyers, MENSA members, TV Hosts). The drama is ripe in the game's premise which encourages alliances while ultimately looking out for yourself. The drama is never forced but rather the effect of the challenges themselves. The challenges are what really shine because of their depth. The show encourages the audience at home to figure out their own strategy by showing the thought process of the different players and teams. None of the game rely largely on luck as they are designed to be controlled by the players so it's always fun to watch how the players figure it out. The Genius never takes itself too seriously with its fun editing that provides a good mix of drama and comedy. Even on the third season the challenges are still complex and fun. I would definitely recommend The Genius to anyone looking for cognitive battles.
Check out this larger review by Honi Soit: http://honisoit.com/2014/03/review-the-genius/
This doesn't feel at all like The First season. In the first season, the problems were logical and strategical, it was between CNI and Professor. Now it's all drama, drama and nothing but drama. Raquel is weak and is bringing down elProfessor, Love triangles really ?, Homosexuality and Sexism, they only need a transgender to be most diverse robbery team ever. I hate to say it, but this show is no longer a Thriller/Action, it's more drama. And I don't like too much drama.
Set aside the last few minutes of the finale for a moment. That last little reveal changes the shape of the episode, and the series, in significant and meaningful ways that make it easy to let it overshadow the rest of the episode. But stop and think about everything that happens here before the scene where he finally meets The Mother.
Because it is, at best, a mixed bag, long before we see the blue french horn again.
I understand the urge to give the audience some idea of what happens to the gang between 2014 and 2030. The problem is that covering a decade and a half in one big episode makes every story feel rushed and underdeveloped. One of the great things about HIMYM is how it used the past and the future to inform the present. Jumping back and forth between a prior conversation and a current one could be the crux of a joke, as could Future Ted's knowing commentary on some boneheaded mistake or unexpected development that was coming down the pipe. But those time jumps weren't just fodder for comedy, as the show did a great job of creating dramatic irony and emotional stakes by showing what lie ahead or the path that led us here. But by compressing fifteen years worth of life developments into an hour, nothing has time to really breathe or feel like it has the temporal scope the show is shooting for.
After all, there's a great story to be told about the gang drifting apart over the years. Another one of the series's best features is the way it combines the exaggerated goofiness of its comedic sensibilities with real, relatable aspects of being in your twenties and thirties. Well, one of the things that hits you once you start to move past that stage of your life is the way that friends, even good friends, can slowly drift apart, not through neglect or anger or hurt feelings, but just because you're suddenly at different places in your life. That's an idea worth exploring.
The problem is that the rush of years in "Last Forever" makes this process feel like something sudden instead of gradual. Sure, we see the chyron at the bottom of the screen showing that we've jumped ahead a year or two, and there's a boatload of semi-clunky expositional dialogue in the episode to let the viewer know where everyone is in their lives and what they're up to, but when all those developments take place over the course of just a few minutes and just a few scenes, it can't help but seem very fast.
One of the best choices HIMYM's creators made in the final season was to parcel out little scenes of the gang's future throughout, giving us a glimpse of what the future held without trying to pack it all into one big episode like this. Sprinkling those flashforwards in did a nice job at making the group's future feel as well-populated as its present and its past. Obviously there were limitations on how much they could do this in prior episodes given the reveals in store for Barney and Robin and Ted, but the method the show chose to relay the gang's future almost inevitably leaves it feeling too quick, too underdeveloped, and too unsatisfying, even apart from the directions the individual stories go.
Those plot developments, however, are another albatross around the finale's neck. The first and most obvious problem comes from Barney and Robin's divorce. Again, there's a legitimate story to be told of two people who care deeply for one another, but don't work as a couple, but it's a difficult story to tell in five minutes, especially when you've spent huge chunks the past season and a half trying to convince the audience that they make sense together. As someone who's been a Barney and Robin skeptic from the beginning, it's entirely plausible to me that the two of them could mean well and have real feelings for one another, but still end up divorced due to some basic incompatibilities. But the reason for their split feels thin here.
There's nothing we know about Barney that suggests globetrotting would be something he's so against. And while there's hints of bigger issues between the two of them, like not getting to see one another or not being on the same page about their respective plans and projects, we never really get to see these problems develop. We're just told about them, and expected to accept that as enough to break them up one episode removed their wedding. Is that result plausible enough based on what we know about Barney and Robin? Sure, but it's just presented to us, rather than developed before our eyes, and since we don't see their path from pledging to spend the rest of their lives together to getting divorced, that end point feels like it happens by fiat rather than something the show earned.
Barney's reversion afterward is just as unsatisfying. Again, there's a believable story about Barney having worked so hard to become a better person, in part to woo Robin, and reverting to his old tricks as a retreat and defense mechanism when his marriage falls apart. But because of the rapidity with which the finale goes from Point A to Point B, it doesn't feel like the natural result of a difficult event; it feels like throwing nine years of character development down the drain in less than a minute. There's a disparity between how much time the show spent building Barney up as more than just an cartoonish hound dog and how much time it spends showing him reverting to his old persona. That cannot help but feel jarring.
What kills me is that I love where they take Barney in "Last Forever." There's something beautiful about the idea that what really changes him isn't some conquest or accomplishment or even a great romance; it's becoming a father. For Barney, "The One" isn't a woman he'll meet some day; it's his daughter, and Neil Patrick Harris delivers a tremendous performance in the scene where he repeats his Ted-like plea, this time to his baby girl. It's a wonderful scene, but the path the episode takes to get there still comes off as a shortcut that has to ignore seasons of character development in order to make it work.
The finale isn't all bad though. While the story of the gang drifting apart is too quick, the scene where they all reunite for Ted's wedding is legitimately touching and full of the good will and warm feelings that the show's been able to generate during its run. Ted and Tracy (I can use her name now!) continue to be adorable together, and the twist that romantic Ted made it five years and two kids into his relationship before he actually married The Mother is a small but effective way to show how much the substance of finding The One was more important to him than the formality of it (even if he was planning on a European castle). It's one of those lived-in details that speaks to his character.
Beyond that, the actual meeting of The Mother is very well done, and it really had to be. Sure, there's a few meetcute cliches involved, but the easy rapport between Ted and Tracy soars once again and nearly saves the entire finale. After all, this was the moment the "Last Forever" had to nail, and it did. Ted and Tracy's conversation weaves in enough of the yellow umbrella mythos for everything to click, and Joshua Radnor and Cristin Miloti both sell the subtle realization that this is something special. For an episode that had to make good on the promise of its title, that meeting went about as well as any fan of the show might have hoped for.
And if the series had ended there, everyone might have gone home happy. Sure, the other problems with the rushed and shortcut-filled finale might have rankled a bit (particularly the way it undoes the wedding we'd just witnessed), but making that moment feel as big and as meaningful as it needed to after all that build up is no small feat, and that alone would have bought Bays & Thomas a hell of a lot of slack.
Frankly, the series could have still gotten away with Tracy dying shortly thereafter, another controversial choice in the finale. There's something tragic but beautiful about the audience watching Ted seek out the woman of his dreams for nine years and then realizing that he only gets to be with her for the same amount of time, while still cherishing and being thankful for the time the two of them had, for that connection and love that was wonderful and worth it no matter how all too brief it may have been. There's a touching theme about the fragility of things in that story, but also about the joy that comes from finding the person you love, that stays with you even after they're gone. It's sad, but it's sweet, in the best HIMYM way.
And then there's Robin.
The decision to pair up Ted and Robin in the last moments of the finale is as tone-deaf and tin-eared an ending as you're likely to find in a major television program, and the reasons abound. The most obvious is that the show devoted so much time to the idea of Ted getting over Robin, and had any number of episodes (the most recent being the execrable "Sunrise") where Ted seemed to have achieved that, to have moved on in his life. Folks like me may try to handwave it, and the show can call back to the premiere of Season 7 where Ted and Robin can declare that all you need for love is chemistry and timing, but at base, Ted and Robin getting together feels like it contradicts so much about the two characters' relationship with one another over the years. So much of the final third of the show involved going over the same beats between Ted and Robin over and over again, of having each move past the other, and coming back to them in the final, despite how iconic that blue french horn has become for the show, just feels like another poorly-established cheat or retcon that isn't in sync with where the show went since that finale was crafted in Season 2.
What's worse is that that ending transforms the story Ted's been telling from a heartwarming if irreverent yarn about the path that led to him meeting the love of his life, to a smokescreen to gain his kids' approval for dating an old flame after their mother's death. Look, to some degree you have to accept the conceit of the show for what it is and not take it too seriously. In real life, no two kids would sit through such a long story, and no father should tell his children about all the women he slept with before he met their mom. But taken in broad strokes, How I Met Your Mother is a story about how all the events in Ted's life, big and small, good and bad, planned or unexpected, went into making him the person who was ready to find Tracy and capable of being with her.
Future Ted himself put it best in "Right Place, Right Time." He tells his kids "There's a lot of little reasons why the big things in our lives happen." He explains that what seemed like chaos was bringing him inexorably toward the best person and the best thing to ever happen to him, that there were "all these little parts of the machine constantly working, making sure that you end up exactly where you're supposed to be, exactly when you're supposed to be there." And he tells them at the time, he didn't know "where all those little things were leading [him] and how grateful [he]'d be to get there."
That, to my mind, is the theme to take from this great, if tainted show. Sure, it's unrealistic that anyone would go on that many tangents in telling the story of their great romance, but the point is that each of these moments, each of these people, were crucial in who he was and who he became when he met Tracy, and that they were as important as that fateful meeting was. Yes, it's a long story, and it has many many detours, but it's the story of all the twists and turns and bumps in the road that brought Ted into the arms of his soulmate, and that smooths over the rougher edges of the show's premise.
Instead, the twist that it's all supposed to be about Ted having the hots for Robin turns that lovely story into a long-winded attempts by a middle-aged man to convince his kids that he should date their aunt That seems much more crass. There's still meaning to be wrung from it, meaning that finds parallels with Tracy and her dead boyfriend Max and the idea that you can have more than one meaningful relationship in your life. But it doesn't add up with what the show had really done to that point. The past nine seasons were no more about Robin than they were about Barney or Marshall or Lily. They no more feel like a way to suggest that Aunt Robin's good dating material than they do that Ted should spend more time with Uncle Barney. As great as that blue french horn was the first time, it had meaning because it represented something we knew was going to end, but which still had beauty and value despite that. This last time we see it, it's represents the opposite, that something beautiful has ended, and the value it had is cast aside in favor of a relationship the series spent years disclaiming. That is deeply, deeply unsatisfying.
Take away those final few scenes, concocted in a different era of the series, and you have a flawed but still potent finale, that delivers on the show's biggest promise and gives the gang one last "big moment" together. But add them back in, and you have an ending to the series that not only runs counter to so much of what the show developed over the course of its run, its final season in particular, but which, moreover, cheapens the story the audience had been invested in for the past nine years. It's almost impressive how a couple of truly terrible moments can do such retroactive damage to such a longrunning show , but here we are, with a sour taste in our mouth from such an ill-conceived finish.
Future Ted was right, a little moment can have a big impacts, and the one at the end of the series is a doozy in that regard. But maybe, just maybe, when we tell our own stories about How I Met Your Mother, we can do what Ted should have done many times -- just leave that part out. There's something wonderful to be gleaned from the ending to this fun, optimistic, heartfelt, and occasionally very rocky series, but it requires us to do what we always do when looking back on things: focus on the good stuff, make our peace with the bad stuff, and remember it at its best.
I mean the first season was already ridiculous, but this one tops it by so much… it's off the scales…
