This film is visually stunning but the story is a choppy, incoherent mess. Interestingly, I didn't realise until writing this review that there was a director's cut released in 2002, which is 20 minutes longer than the standard theatrical version, and I would be interested to see it as I think it would be a much stronger watch.
The theatrical release is carried by excellent production values and a good cast. I'm not sure who's more unrecogniseable in their role: Tim Curry or Robert Picardo - the latter definitely should have had a greater amount of screen time as the one scene he's in is a highlight for me.
Worth a watch in the standard version but I would say try and find the director's cut, if possible.
Shout by ElliotVIP 6BlockedParent2019-07-28T17:40:28Z
This film is visually stunning but the story is a choppy, incoherent mess. Interestingly, I didn't realise until writing this review that there was a director's cut released in 2002, which is 20 minutes longer than the standard theatrical version, and I would be interested to see it as I think it would be a much stronger watch.
The theatrical release is carried by excellent production values and a good cast. I'm not sure who's more unrecogniseable in their role: Tim Curry or Robert Picardo - the latter definitely should have had a greater amount of screen time as the one scene he's in is a highlight for me.
Worth a watch in the standard version but I would say try and find the director's cut, if possible.