The thing that is absolutely fascinating, is that we didn't see him kill her. And i thought he might be innocent. I'm not sure really. The detectives and the prosecutor kinda twisted things?
I'm not sure...
And another odd aspect, is that body that washed up. It had it's arms severed with surgical precision, yet wasn't the woman in question's body. So why was that mentioned?
I don't know if he was guilty or innocent. A lot of the things could be coincedence, like getting bath mats. Though... There was the aspect of the surgical cleaner in the drains. Although didn't they say it LOOKED like it? Or even if there WAS that stuff in the drains, it could be natural cleaner or some other reason. But it is suspicious, as is the paint and bath mat.
But it is very interesting in this episode how you don't really know if he's guilty or innocent. The guy and the prosecutor were quite confident, but the woman had doubts. I have doubts, too. The guy mainted his innocence all through the episode and he was quite passionate sometimes about his innocence. Even though he was an asshole, that doesn't make him guilty of being murderer. But i guess it makes you more look like one, and that could also be a lesson in society. Don't be an asshole.
