What is going on with the ratings on here? 25%? Did a hatemob rate this film? It's an effective homage to 80s sci-fi flicks. Nothing more. Nothing less. But certainly not 25% "worst movie ever" material. 7.2 on imdb, 78 on metacritic. Let's just say professional critics are usually a bit more trustworthy than trakt users...
Wow, this was way better than I expected it to be.
A bit sad, that the federation seems to have strayed from its main mission.
The participation of Star Trek veterans as producers shows. Buildings and technology look like they belong in the ST Universe, no 2 million gigantic technological leaps in the first 45 minutes (well one, but that one is kind of needed...)
Best of all: They concentrated on the story instead of preaching some agenda.
So thats a 9/10 from me.
[7.0/10] Patrick Stewart can act. That is, perhaps, no revelation. But the strongest moment in the series premiere of Star Trek: Picard is simply giving him a moment to emote, to condemn, to express his distress and regret over the state of things. When pushed to explain why he left Starfleet, the fire that fueled The Next Generation is revived, and the ghosts of the utopia it operated in are exercised.
Picard left because of xenophobia, because of isolationism, because of an abandonment of the principals of altruism and mercy and acceptance that buttressed the Federation he knew and believed in. That connection to larger ideas -- of a once noble nation turning its back on those in need out of a fear for what opening one’s doors to the world could invite in, and an architect of that community severing his ties with it when it shrinks from the ideals he so deeply believes in -- not only imbues this story with a real world resonance; it’s pure Trek.
But it’s not enough to offer a man meditating on his legacy and the institutions that devolved on his watch. So we need a mystery box. And we need a terrorist attack from a group of “synths” on Mars that scared the Federation into submission. And we need Romulan refugees resettling in an old Borg cube. And we need Romulan fighters trying to root out and destroy the last of the synths. And we need a mysterious young woman -- half River Tam and half Daisy Johnson -- to seek out Picard’s help to sort it all out.
It’s all...fine. It’s naive to expect a modern day science fiction show to rely on the staid, contemplative tone that The Next Generation thrived on. I don’t mind Dahj kicking ass in a hand-to-hand combat scene that makes Kirk’s karate chops look like childsplay. I don’t mind a wire fu-esque battle between her and a cadre of Romulan attackers that involves dodging phaser fire, leaping grand distances, and gory-ish explosions. Times change, and shows have to change with them, even if it means making allowances for the sort of fireworks that once disappointed fans in Picard’s jump to the big screen.
But what I do mind is how generic so much of the rest of the episode feels. Make no mistake -- it is a tall order to follow-up to one of the most beloved science fiction series of all time, that honors past successes while forging a distinct path for the show at hand. But if you shaved off the serial numbers and took away the easter eggs, this could be any other modern science fiction show, with a look and dialogue and mysteries that suffice but don’t wow.
The best you can say is that in the early going at least, Star Trek: Picard doesn't feel like fanservice. Sure, Picard’s dog is named “Number One,” and he orders earl grey tea, and he has a futuristic safety deposit box full of familiar trinkets. But when the show invokes the past, it does so in service of the story in the here and now.
And yet, that’s both a blessing and a curse. Revealing Dahj as Data’s daughter adds some emotional potency to her pairing with Picard. They make Brent Spiner’s guest appearances in the episode more than a fond reminder of everyone’s favorite android, but as a touchstone for Picard’s close relationship with his former protege. For all the flack Star Trek: Nemesis caught, one of its saving graces was the way it suggested that, flesh and blood or no, Data was Picard’s son, his family. So by making Dahj a sort of granddaughter to Picard through that bond makes her relevant in the early going, when the show has to be economical about establishing its characters and stakes.
But at the same time, that’s part of the problem. Stewart and Isa Briones do their best, but the on screen chemistry isn’t quite there yet, so the results feel more like Star Trek: Picard drafting on the good feelings of old, even if it wants to move in a new direction. Fans of the Next Generation will shudder to hear the name Bruce Maddox, the man who tried to have Data declared property, invoked. Still, it feels a tad cheap to have him missing and potentially responsible for some sort of new-fangled “biological synthetic” that is cloned or replicated or somehow otherwise spawned from Data.
All the while, “Remembrance” has the same, overly glossy look that the rest of modern Trek does. All the while, we get characters giving tearful statements that tidily deposit their backstories, with performances that can’t support the psychological weight the show wants to place on them as well as Stewart can. All the while, we get another damn mystery box, where we’re left to guess who made Dahj and her twin sister, and whether the twin’s new flirty Romulan acquaintance is part of the apparent terrorist group, and what the true motivation of the “synths” who blew up Utopia Planetia was, since the show apparently can’t muster that intrigue while still putting its proverbial cards on the table.
And all the while, we have to cut through clunky scenes that try to establish all of this. Little of it is outright bad. This is a competent production with a stellar lead actor and enough reverence for the source material not to upset too much of it. But when you’re bringing back one of television’s great characters and invoking the legacy of the series that started a new age of Star Trek, I expect better than solid but less-than-inspired adequacy.
None of it quite matches that one moment of personal truth or the real life implications of Picard’s disdain for what the organization he once loved has transformed into. When “Remembrance” deposits him into its adventure, it becomes just another off-the-shelf science fiction series, albeit one that can harness the history and world of The Next Generation, The Original Series, and even the 2009 reboot.
In that one scene, though, Star Trek: Picard gives us a glimpse of the show it could be. “Remembrance” soars when it allows its lead performer to do what he does best and embrace the thematic resonance and introspection that were the hallmarks of his prior series, rather than flash and whodunnits and twisty reveals. Only time will tell whether, with so much narrative throat-clearing and table-setting out of the way, the series sets a course for the better.
Great animation, mind blowing visuals, tremendous story arc, amazing humour and pays homage to the late Stan Lee and Steve Ditko. The post credits scene was funny as fuck.
Watch as though a child and don't let the more annoying performances, lackluster script, and none-too-subtle social justice statements laced throughout get to you and you'll be fine. I'm not going to lie - this movie has some serious issues, but if you can reign in your expectations and just enjoy it for the visual majesty it is (and on the big screen in 3D), then you got a shot enjoying yourself.
Genuinely an amazing movie which surpassed my expectations, and it turned out to be a little more serious then I expected. The animation was nothing short of spectacular and the voices behind the characters came through the characters. The whole production was world class, and to say the movie was heart warming and fun is the least I could say. It turned out to be different then what I thought I was going to watch, but it was even better.
Watching this feels like watching two different movies. The first movie is one in which jokes are forced and music feels shoehorned in. It feels like the writers and director are beating you over the head trying to make the point of "look, look, remember us? remember how you liked music and jokes the last time?" For me the first half of this movie is a poor imitation of the first Guardians of the Galaxy. 6/10.
All of this changes around an hour into the movie however. Once they actually started moving forward with the plot, this movie becomes something special. The second half of this movie is perhaps the best thing that Marvel Studios has put to screen. It is so heartfelt and moving, the comedy lands PERFECTLY every time, and the movie makers allow us as an audience to remember what we loved about these characters the first time around organically. The second half of this movie is almost flawless.
Special mention to Dave Bautista's Drax... by far and away the character that stole the show. HILARIOUS!
To call this another Marvel winner would be an understatement.
Volume 2 is the best cinematic experience I've had in a long time. The action is great, the various cameos hilarious, the effects awe-inspiring and the laughs frequent and well-placed (one of the few gripes I had with Doctor Strange). And in the midst of all this, what really drives the story and keeps the audience interested is the character development. The heroes with which we fell in love in Volume 1 become deeper and multilayered, and the new additions add fantastic new dynamics.
While still falling victim to some minor storytelling tropes, GotG2 is the epitome of the spectacle movie.
I was surprised of the 73% rating but then, I voted 8 points. I think it's fair.
The movie is not bad but good, but not particularly great. The opening scene alone would be worth 10 points. It was awesome. Was it done in one shot? Looks like it, at least I want to think that, and it was really good.
One could argue about the plot being too shallow, but then again it's a James Bond movie, so what do you expect? Of course there are some plot holes, but that didn't upset me at all. What upset me was the untimed and forced "fun" moments. The movie had several really intense moments with great shots, camera movements and silence—Oh the silence!—but the they destroyed them with catch phrases and stupid comments. (Referring to "Oh, Shit" on the train and "What do we do now?" right after) There were several more stupid moments and they did not suit the movie. Without them, it would be 10/10!
Needs to be on DVD!!
I knew Alita:Battle Angel was based on a manga before I watched it, but I hadn't read it. I was skeptical going in, because it's difficult to translate well something as detailed and long as mangas can be into a movie. I have to say that the movie was really captivating and it made want to read the manga.
The plot was a bit cheesy. While the premise was pretty novel (at least for me), the development of the story was kinda predictable. That's excusable considering it is, in a sense, an "origin story", but, still, it felt like something already seen. The tone of the whole thing was pretty light, although the fight scenes were a bit more gritty. And that scene with the brain, wow. That was out of nowhere, and dark . I hope the eventual sequels lean more into a dark, mature and even gruesome (to an extent) tone.
The casting was pretty great. Rosa Salazar's performance as Alita was incredible, the viewer is really able to empathize with her character. I don't think I have to say anything about Christoph Waltz, that man is a legend. I also enjoyed Mahershala Ali, I wish his character could have had more screentime. Same for Jennifer Connelly.
Only exception would be Keenan Johnson, who plays Hugo. I don't think it's the actor fault, but his character was really out of place. I think part of it was miscasting, but Hugo wasn't developed properly as a character. I think either less or more time would have helped. As it is now, you don't really care for him as much as the movie wants you to. I'll only say that seeing him die twice was quite satisfying.
The CGI and world building were marvelous. The classic cyberpunk look, with amazing technology like cyborgs mixed in with poverty is always interesting to me. With a great company like Weta supervising the visual effects the results are what you would expect. The cyborgs feel real and like there is a connection between their cybernetic bodies and their human mind. The main character, Alita, is completely CGI; and yet it feels perfectly natural and connected to the environment. I thought the eyes looked weird at first, but in the end I appreciated the uniqueness and emotiveness it brought to her face.
Overall, one of the best movie for what regards visual effects. With the exception of two scenes: the one underwater (which, to my understanding, is one of the most difficult things to properly simulate) and the scene where Hugo falls off. The latter in particular felt like it was from the 90s, no idea how it made it into an otherwise gorgeous movie.
In the end, it's a movie I would recommend. If you like action and cyberpunk and can tolerate a bit of cheesiness, you would probably enjoy this movie. If not, I think the photo-real effects might be another good reason.
8/10
wow. the pilot was very good.
Doesn't feel like Star Wars. Super Disneyfied. Characters are not very deep or memorable yet. We'll see as it goes on, but it feels very hollow so far.
Edit: After the first 5 or 6 episodes it starts to get way better. Feels like Star Wars now! I just didn't give it enough time.
Much better than I had feared. From some of the rumors I had heard my expectations were low. Screw all that. It was pretty good. I'm not saying they still don't have time to cock the whole thing up but some of my optimism has returned. Let's hope this is more Mandalorian than Last Jedi or Fall of Skywalker.
I just got back from a preview showing for the new Spider-man movie, and WOW. It is LIT (pardon my language). Soooooo funny with tons of personality and a surprisingly great depth of emotion in quite a few scenes (some tears may have been shed). I love this new take on the comic book hero origin movie and the entire film just screams originality. I wasn't 100% sure on the animated look before, but it really fits into the entire setting and "alternate dimensions" premise of the movie later, which injects a ton of creativity and potential into this new film.
After Sony released Venom, I thought that they should just stop trying with the Spider-verse. However, this new film and universe gives me a completely different perspective. I can't believe something like this came from Sony...
Every goddamn time, Dammit Hardison!
Full disclosure: I loved both Cloverfield and 10 Cloverfield Lane, and was very excited to see what this film would add to the Cloverfield mythology.
The Cloverfield Paradox is the third entry (and the first Netflix film) in the now loosely-connected film trilogy which is a good film on its own, while managing to somewhat explain the events in the first 2 films, and actually seems to strengthen those ones without really standing on its own 2 feet.
This movie takes your usual "space horror" genre movie and adds a new mind-bending aspect to it, for better or for worse. Acting from all the cast members is suitably great. I was invested in the story from the opening scene, and I didn't ever really predict what would happen next. Lots of twists and turns, so prepare to be sitting at the edge of your seat the whole film. It's just the right length at around 1 hour and 40 minutes. A couple of the horror elements are pretty weak, with a handful of very strange visual effects (clearly some experimentation here) that sometimes don't look as great as the filmmakers were probably hoping for. But it's the chemistry, or rather, the fighting and tense relationships between the crew that really makes this movie. While
I can see why they would release this on Netflix vs theatrically because, unlike the first 2, this one would probably have crossed over into R rating territory, which could have definitely limited it's earnings at the box office.
Like it's predecessor, the aspects that make it "Cloverfield" do seemed a bit shoehorned in at the last minute, more as an afterthought than a vital component in the film's chemistry. With Lane that worked out. Here, not as much. It works with the Cloverfield universe logic, but just barely.
Personally, I thought it was a decent entry in the currently-developing Cloverfield franchise. I'm still excited to see the fourth film when it releases (hopefully in theatres) and see how it connects and furthers this ever-interesting film franchise. Hopefully it picks up steam again after this film causes a brief setback for the intriguing Cloverfield saga.
Initial reaction.
The good: Great opening, good concept, okay to superb acting.
The bad: Forgettable popcorn flick, bad delivery, overlooked plot holes, uncomfortable transitions between locations, terrible dialogue, crappy taping of a fantastic franchise to a mundane sci-fi horror, horrendous tension and character building, overall typical space movie that makes 'LIFE' look fantastic.
I had no idea what to expect from this film and I actually really enjoyed it. Highly unique plot, loved all the alien creatures, spectacularly aesthetically pleasing visuals! Overall an enjoyable choice.
A bit like The Goonies meets teen comedy. A fun adventure. I wish there were more movies like this.
I saw it opening day to show my support. It's got a heart-felt story, and the stop-animation techniques are outstanding! I'm glad people are starting to recognize the art form. I'm definitely picking up the Blu-ray once it's out as this one is my favorite from LAIKA.
I <3 it with all my heart!
Interesting tidbit: I recently learned that some of the people that worked on Gumby also worked on Kubo.
It's such a beautifully animated movie.
bitch saved everyone with the power of love i'm crying
It was a pleasure meeting you, even if you are my least favorite vegetable! Take care, Turniphead!
I don't understand why so many people seem to be hating on this. Is it cheesy? Yes. Is it part of the whole Disney PC agenda? Of course. But it's still good!
The bottom line is that these are short little fun "webisodes", and they're good!
I'm Mary Poppins, y'all!
Very good si-fi movie. Its very better from new remake from 2008.
I just can't believe it , the show will never be the same , but I think that maybe somehow ziva is alive .
James Cameron is often prone to an overextension of his ambition, to mathematically-sound but cliche'd plotlines, and overall to making movies that are understandable as examples of how to make a AAA blockbusting piece of cinema that somehow shows no true artfulness whatsoever. So that would be an understandable perspective to come into The Abyss from-- But it surprises. The emotion that was so overwrought in Titanic shines as a component of a larger film, and the victimization of the alien that ruined Avatar is more compelling when those victims are really, truly alien. The Abyss is no true classic, but it is the most artful showing in James Cameron's filmography, and convincing acting throughout anchors the impact of the movie.
