This is a remake of an episode from the original series; like many remakes, it's inferior to the original. While this one has its moments, some disturbing content--especially implied sexual relations between Data and a human woman--messed this up for me. The language was actually rather clean...until the last scene or two; then they fouled it up.

Content Concerns:
Sex: Implied sex between a male-type android and a human woman; Data is stopped short before making a crude joke. 2/5
Nudity: A woman is seen wearing an outfit that displays her midriff, her back, and a bit of the lower part of her chest. 3/5
Language: Four or so d-words; one or two h-words; two or three misuses of God's name. 2/5
Violence: Sci-fi action violence throughout. 3/5
Drugs: It is said that the reactions that the crew has are like being intoxicated. 4/5
Frightening/Intense Scenes: Plenty of emotional intensity; the ship nearly gets destroyed; Geordi is seen without his visor. 3/5

Score: 3/5

loading replies

13 replies

Reply by Deleted

@ithinkdifferent "Content Concerns" for ST:TNG? Seriously?

@abstractals You should read his comments on classic Disney sitcoms like Lizzie McGuire. For example, "Sex: The whole episode is about two teenage girls buying bras for the first time. 3/5" — https://trakt.tv/comments/96331

Reply by Deleted

@dgw LOL "The story of two teenage girls buying their first bras is of no interest to me, and made me feel a bit creepy watching it." This seems a natural consequence of a 30-year old dude watching a show aimed at tween girls.

@abstractals Between the "Content Concerns" left here on Trakt and the stuff called out in his reviews on Blogger (https://reading-rebel.blogspot.com/)… all you need to do is look at his Blogger profile to know why.

Reply by Deleted

@dgw "Unless they fall into the superhero, sci-fi/fantasy, or Christian genres, I rarely watch PG-13 films. Among discerning viewers (...) movies with that rating are known for getting the reaction, 'That should have been rated R!'"

Are they? Are they really? That's not how the Motion Picture Association of America film rating system works! That's not how any of this works! LOL

If this dude thinks a PG-13 film should be rated R, he ought to try watching a Lars Von Trier flick sometime. And he calls himself a rebel.

Alas, I have too many palms and not enough face.

Content Concerns:
Sex: One near kiss.

ROFL

@abstractals I ran out of palms months ago, personally. Just have to accept that people like this exist and move on… lol

Reply by Deleted

@dgw Even so, you gotta have some kind of conviction to write 1,200+ reviews for Trakt.tv and only receive a total of 31 Likes.

@abstractals Man, I don't even know how many Likes my reviews get. They're mostly for my future self to refer to at some point. But if people do like them then that's cool I guess.

Reply by Deleted

@dgw (FYI: You've written a total of 1,087 reviews (80,826 words) for a total of 335 Likes.)

@abstractals (OK, now you have to tell me how you're getting these stats lol)

Reply by Deleted

@dgw Just use the CSV EXPORT button to grab your entire Comments database, and then mine it for info.

To count your likes, throw it into Excel, and AUTOSUM the "like_count" column.
To count words, throw the "comment" column into Word.

You can even make a Word Cloud out of the most commonly-used words in your reviews.

Here's mine (made from my 119,625 words): http://i.imgur.com/CCAVIG2.png

@abstractals Hmm, you can export other people's data? I can, in fact, grab a CSV of someone else's comments. @justin is this intended?

@dgw yes, you can do that for public profiles

Loading...