Can't get over how bad this was. An utterly ridiculous premise with so many gaping plot holes, wooden acting and an ending that's telegraphed from the start. A major blot on Finchers portfolio, certainly his worst film and 3 hrs of my life I won't get back.
loading replies
Interesting. What are those plotholes? This review is so short and so unexplanative yet it got so many likes.
Shout by stormsm
If you're looking for an action and "turn brain off now" film, just don't watch it and spare us the 6-7 hearts review.
I for one, am very tired from 500$m crap like Indi Day and Marvel's poop. So I was very excited to watch this one.
This one is more like Spielberg's Encounters from the Third Kind. It's more about the characters in the film and the amazing journey they go through. It's mostly about the human behavior that will make you think.
While it's not an End of the World aliens movie like Battle: Los Angeles, it still offers great amount of military presence and plenty of stuff that's going on.
So if you actually want to care about an intelligent movie and use your head - go. Otherwise, go watch an X men.
Highly recommended for some audience 10/10.
2-feb-2017 edit: Just came out on Bluray and I saw it again. Definitely keeping my rating.
Watching again at July-2023, excited towards Dune II : Excellent. Excellent film. So called plot-holes listed here are negligible when the overall product is really thoughtful and masterfully crafted.loading replies
@stormsm I feel you on this subject but I don't think that this film is an intelligent movie. It is a well shot movie, so suspenseful and kinda thoughtful that what humans can do if they deal this situation. But the third act is a disappointment for me unfortunately. I care about "why they are here and what they are gonna do" thing but it didn't me satisfy. The film goes another subject.
Also, people can watch both Marvel movies and Sci-fi movies. If I can watch an X-Men movie, it doesn't mean that I cannot watch this movie. I see your point but there are other peoples like me takes this argument differently. Thanks...
Fury sucks. Okay, most of the movie was actually alright, but then the protagonist rapes someone in what is meant to be a tender moment. Hurr, I bet somebody being forced into a bedroom by two soldiers with guns can definitely give consent. And then Brad Pitt's character's depicted as this great leader who keeps this ragtag group in check by forcing them to shoot unarmed POWs and as this gentleman by threatening to rape someone and swapping plates instead of just telling the men who he's in charge of to stop being assholes. What fantastic leadership skills, what a true war hero. Of course, war itself may not be glorified in this movie, but Pitt's character definitely is; Pitt himself said that it helped him become a better father. And then ending happened and hahaha, that means the Americans in this movie are literally worse than Nazis. The action was bad, it was just this huge cacophony and colour-coded tracer bullets that looked like light beams from Star Wars. The sound mixing was pretty muddy but that's probably the screener's fault.
loading replies
The german girl pulled him into the bedroom herself, not sure where you got "forced into a bedroom by two soldiers with guns" from. Not sure what you mean by the ending making the Nazis look worse, I thought it was to show their equality more than anything, since Norman did the same with a kid prior by letting him go, and if anything the Nazi's were worse as that kid killed the people infront of him.
I can't say you're wrong about the effects on the tracer bullets though, since I had the same "star wars" thought while watching it, as many others did according to the reviews here.
Overall I enjoyed the movie, despite Brad Pitts character not being the best. Nowhere near "Saving Private Ryan" like some people here claim though.
The director and the producer should be arrested. In order to shoot the film, they destroyed part of the monument that is Unesco's patrimony.
They broke ancient stones, cut trees without permission to make fires with twenty meters ...
It was a total disrespect, destroy world heritage just for the purpose of making money ....
I recommend everyone, do a search on Google or translate Portuguese news on the subject.
loading replies
@_diogogomes Following update on the accusations: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/portugal-rejects-claim-terry-gilliams-don-quixote-shoot-harmed-convent-1018501
tl:dr They were judged wrong.
I remember this from my youth, really nice gem of the 90s, RDJ was brilliant
loading replies
I love this movie! I was 10 years old when it came out. I loved Kyra Sedgwick!!!
Shout by Ramesh Hetfield
VIP7A good PPV finally from the guys at WWE. All the matches in the show was good and executed well and kept the fans entertained. But when it comes to a Roman Reigns main event, every body knows it is going to be boring and slow. So what do you do? You throw in Rollins, Ambrose, Ziggler and McIntyre into the picture. This is where we thought we would see an unexpected ending to the main event. But WWE thought about making things more interesting and bringing back Brock Lesner and ending the match without a winner Pffft. So this does mean Strowman's MIB cash-in is still in hands?. Nonetheless, it was a great show! 7/10
loading replies
@jim222001 Yeah bro. Was so dissapointed with the main event. Since it was considered a "No match", i assume they would say the money in the bank contract was never cashed in. Haha. Such a good show ended very badly!
