A couple great gore scenes, bad 80s hair and outfits, b-movie acting, one of the worst/best endings, and a really horrible roll credits song that has to be heard to believe.
Can’t believe this is what Star Wars has become. It’s a hot pile of steaming Wookiee. Wish they had cancelled it.
It’s a decent show, it follows the same format give or take a few things as several shows that have been popular over the years. The acting is above average for a network T.V. Show. If real detectives were this incompetent, our jails would be empty or full of innocent people. I liked Carrie Preston in some other show I don’t want to admit I watched, so I decided to add this to my rotation. It’s a good show for me to look at my phone or get some work done around the house at the same time as watching, without getting lost.
Thought this was kind of terrible. Sarah Paulson was the most annoying, followed by Kathy Bates, and then Cuba Gooding Jr.. They have all shined in other roles, but were handed a steaming pile of script. I took a break from this show after Hotel, and just revisited the series. This season makes me not want to watch the rest. I want to say that at least 6 episodes were unnecessary. I’m sure it would have been less annoying if it were only 4-6 episodes, but I’m not positive it would have made a difference quality wise.
Season 1 episode 1 was one of my favorite episodes of any show, and since then it just kept getting worse. The first 2 or 3 seasons were ok, the bit in the middle had some of my favorite characters and a few good ideas at least, but ever since with this nuclear bomb and Padre BS it has been torture. This last season has had some of the worst writing I have ever seen and I’d be surprised if the actors aren’t embarrassed by the dialogue they were under contract to perform. It was fitting that they brought Nick back for that final scene, he really stole the show from the comfort of a coffee can.
Instead of Electric Dreams, they should have called this Short Dicks. Seriously though, these stories were all good ideas but some just missed the mark. Overall I enjoyed it though. The stellar cast really helped elevate most of the episodes.
I thought this was decent, I wouldn’t recommend it to someone or let anyone know I watched it though. It didn’t feel like a chore to watch like Interview with a Vampire did, maybe because the actress is easy on the eyes. I didn’t read the Witch books so maybe that’s why I liked it more than the Vampire stories that I did read and felt like they didn’t do a good job with. Overall though my main thought is why the heck AMC cancelled a show that was as good as Lodge 49, and then they continue to put out sub par series after series.
My wife acted like she did not like this movie, which is usually a good indication that I thought it was great…which I did. I will say that in a room with all the lights shut off, stretched out on the couch while watching a movie over 2 hours long, she stayed awake, which I don’t think she has ever done, so at the very least this movie should engage you. Visuals were stunning, and helped give the movie that magical feel that I think they were going for. I was entertained.
I’m not familiar with the source material, but this show has some truly terrible acting. Not sure why I’m going along for the ride. The lead actor delivers each line with a whiny voice that is unbearable. His maker and his maker’s maker are 2 of the worst actors on the show. When “Brad” (I think that’s the bosses name) who plays a human sippy cup is one of the best actors on the show, you know this show probably won’t last long. I do like the vampire assassin for hire character that was introduced in episode 4 I think. The rest of the show has just been bad. I didn’t expect much and somehow it has not even reached my low expectations.
I remember loving the first movie because it had that feeling to it that you get when watching movies like “Big Trouble in Little China”, or “The Fifth Element”…not trying to win Oscars, but just good cheesy in a good way entertainment. I didn’t even know there was a second one, but when I was surfing through the leaving soon section of the HBO app there it was. Not knowing the 2nd one existed should have been my first clue. This movie was terrible. It was so bad, I’m thinking of rewatching the first one to make sure I’m not misremembering a movie I saw probably 20 years ago.
I was really wishing this would be good, but it is awful. The previews for this show weren’t spectacular or anything, so I guess it’s not much of a surprise. Seems like every new show now is centered around a teenage girl. For some reason I end up watching bad shows all the way through though, maybe even at a higher rate than the good ones. Don’t know why I punish myself like this. Here is to hoping they cancel this one, so I don’t waste another 8+ hours of life on this. I still have good shows like Ozark, Atypical, Longmire, Letterkenny, Upload, Dark, Loudermilk, Future Man, Orphan Black, Parks and Recreation…to name a few that I need to catch up on or finish.
Someone who was mean to ants as a child was trippin’ balls on some acid when a friend handed them a notebook and something to write with.
I’ve watched 3 episodes so far and I think this is the worst Star Wars related story I’ve seen and I’m not a huge fan of anything except the first 3 movies. I like the other movies, but not geeking out over them like I did when I saw the first 3 when I was a kid with my Dad & Brother at the movies and then watched them over and over on cable. Mando has its moments and Boba was decent even though I would like more violence and cool stuff like the opening seen of Mando season 1. The Star Wars franchise has always had a few weak links when it comes to acting, but the first 3 episodes are by far the worst acting I’ve seen so far in anything Star Wars related. Specifically the actress that is pursuing Kenobi everywhere. I mean Flea’s acting was better and he was awful too. Not a big fan of the Princess either and the whole Jedi chasing a 10 year old that doesn’t look or sound like she’s 10 around a city and across rooftops was just ridiculous. I could go on, but why bother. Disney is going to keep ruining this franchise like they are the Marvel one. I’ll be finishing this one just to see if it can actually get worse. This show is not even “fair”. I don’t know what # is for “poor” but if it’s anything higher than a 4 it’s worse than that, and probably closer to a 3/10 than a 4/10.
This movie was terrible. Even if you are watching it just for the action and not for the story or acting, it still leaves much to be desired. Knowing that Snake-Eyes and Storm Shadow are probably the 2 most beloved characters of the franchise, you think they would have tried harder. The actor that played Snake Eyes was decent, but pretty much everyone else with lines was garbage. Especially Baroness, Scarlett and Storm Shadow. I really wish someone would have got this right. Even WB DC comic shows have been better than this and that is saying a lot. Woulda been nice if they coulda captured the feel of a show like Daredevil or Punisher and brought that to this movie, instead it felt like…I don’t even know?…but not good.
If Vincent Price is in a movie you should be entertained, and this movie is no exception. Rather gruesome scene at the beginning of the movie that I imagine would have pushed the limits of censorship at the time. The human sized fly costume is less scary than the scene that shows the fly sized version. I liked the movie, and it was on my list of movies I have to see, but it’s not one I feel like I would enjoy a second time. Seems like they could have done more with this story and its ideas to make it scary and more memorable, but they just barely touched on them. One thing I can say is this family was lazy, they didn’t seem to want to help each other as much as they should have.
This is a classic for a reason, it’s a must see. Most of the movie is a 6 or 7, but the last 20ish minutes, with the child scene and once the mob gets going, the movie is a 9 or 10. I remember thinking when I was a kid how tragic the scene with the child was (although I’m not sure I knew what tragic meant at the time, the idea definitely conveyed). He was out of flowers to float and made the next logical step in his damaged child like mind. I also wondered what happened to the poor kitten. As an adult watching old movies it’s amazing how lackadaisical parents are about watching their children. I was a child of the 70s and we ran the neighborhood alone, but leaving your kid that couldn’t swim, alone near a lake while you go to check traps…I would think that was poor judgment even in the 1800s when the story was written.lol One thing the movie didn’t do, was explain, even a little, how the father came to the conclusion that his daughter was murdered and how they came to the conclusion that it was the monster who did it. I mean the way I see it he had an alibi, everyone saw him crashing a wedding. At one point when they are listening for the monster that is loose in the wedding building the monster “groans”, and it sounds more like a fart box which I laughed at. Anyway I’m going to research how many actors were hurt in the making of this. Colin Clive or a stunt man rolled his leg over a torch in one scene which looked like it could have hurt and I doubt they had much in the way of safety precautions or equipment in 1931. If you get a chance read up on Mary Shelley’s life and all the people that were part of her life…talk about tragedies.
If you simply watch the movie and don’t worry about the source material or take the movie too seriously, it’s more entertaining than the original. It’s not really horror as much as comedy though.
This is one of the better old horror/suspense movies I’ve seen. The acting was superb. This was 2 hours long but didn’t drag at all and kept me engaged. The characters Monica, Leroy, and Hortense were especially engaging. Rhoda was a good little sociopath and the way she described the events at the picnic was and still is horrifying. Before it was a film it was a broadway play and you get that play like feeling watching the movie. The ending was sort of abrupt, but I liked it. Make sure you watch the character introductions at the end, there is a little lighthearted gag scene that’s kind of funny considering what just went down in the movie. Guess they were trying to lighten the mood.
The biggest prop bat on strings or real bat for that matter I’ve laid eyes upon. Love the music in the opening credits. I’ve heard it many times before, but can’t place it and don’t know if it’s original to the movie (going to have to do some research). To be honest, this movie was a little disappointing to me. I’ve seen 100s of vampire movies, but wasn’t sure if I had seen this before. I probably would have given it a 6, but I bumped it up to a 7 keeping in mind that it was made in 1931. It’s not very exciting, the movie is mostly silent and there isn’t any suspenseful music in the background and besides lighting up his stare, a stormy boat trip, some fog and lightning, a dangling bat, and a crawling spider there isn’t much in the way of camera tricks or special effects (not even bite marks or fangs). The acting isn’t bad, for the most part, and the sets are really good. It’s the OG Dracula, so it’s a must see. Updated: The music played during the opening credits is from “Swan Lake”, no wonder it sounded familiar, everyone has heard parts of it somewhere wether they know it or not. It fits the opening perfectly.
I think there is more fog in this movie than in “The Fog”. Venetia Stevenson, whose daughter was the inspiration for the Guns N’ Roses song “Sweet Child O’ Mine” and was married to Axl Rose, is absolutely stunning…what a beauty. She has some decent acting chops as well. Another fun fact, her likeness has been printed on Sweetheart Stout bottles and cans since 1958. Anyway to the movie…more fog machine please. The beginning part of the movie has the witches declaring their souls to Satan which may have been edgy at the time and seemed almost as if it was a different film with a darker tone. The acting is above average for a horror film and takes a little bit of the bad taste out of your mouth at having been fed plot points repeatedly. In classic horror film fashion, the lead ignores all the clues, even though she reads them out loud to the audience, and she goes into the basement anyway. This is a good movie even though the writers let you know at every turn what lies ahead. Literally…there is a guy at a stop giving directions and unheeded advice throughout the film, and another one that hitches rides at a turn towards town that is an omen of bad things to come.
This movie is a wreck if you dissect it, but it is also what makes it slightly more enjoyable. The problem is I don’t believe that was the intent. After the nurse faints from hearing a voice telling her something on the phone (the main plot of the movie), she takes what seems like 15 minutes of overacting and being cajoled to let us know exactly what was said to her during her 20 second phone call…I was cringing during this whole exchange. Later on there were flashback sequences that were much, much longer than most movie flashbacks and they showed things that the person having the flashback wouldn’t have been involved in, which I found funny (although I may have misinterpreted this, as I had some real life goings on outside my house that drew my attention away a couple of times while watching this and I didn’t care to watch it again). This was one of those movies that at every turn you will find yourselves thinking that no real person would react or act the way the characters did in almost every situation presented to them and this movie is probably worth the watch for that reason alone. This one will leave you scratching your head at times, not in a trying to figure it out way, but more in a that really just happened and I bore witness to it sort of way.
Some top notch actors on this project. Very good detective story based on an Edgar Allen Poe story “The Murders in the Rue Morgue” which some say is the template from which all modern detective stories were birthed. Fast paced movie with a decent plot twist, which is predictable, yet entertaining.
I enjoyed this movie, it had a little bit of a Texas chainsaw family feel to it, obviously before that movie was ever made. The spider game was creepy and fun. I don’t pretend to know the intent of the movie makers at the time, but it seems like they weren’t trying to make a serious horror film and were just having fun with it. The acting fits the content and gives the movie that campy feel like the Adam West Batman series. As with most old horror movies that have a person of color in them, it was easy to guess what was going to happen. In this case Mr. Moreland (The Messenger) is indeed the first character to play the “spider game”. Overall this movie does what it was supposed to do, which is entertain.
I really liked the concept of this movie. For some reason I enjoyed the build up of this movie more than the ending. The acting was excellent and some of the bizarre banter of the Doctors and Hospital staff along with the way the director captured facial expressions was enough to keep me interested and engaged. There is a lot said without a whole bunch of dialogue in this movie. Some great imagery and camera work.
Some of the best acting in a 1940s horror movie that I have seen. Boris Karloff and Henry Daniell were amazing. Russell Wade’s acting wasn’t as good. Great plot partially based on some true life events (look up Burke & Hare). Toddy, Toddy, Toddy.
Good movie. Some laughable moments like the narration for the “Deaf Mute’s” thoughts. The acting wasn’t bad, but it wasn’t good either. I had a boss that behaved like the captain, where job safety issues were concerned. This crew should have been more concerned with their captain’s behavior.
Some decent acting, considering the thin plot they had to work with. I liked the drums and dancing. If there were half stars, it’s probably a 5 1/2. I gave it a 6 because I have a soft spot for old “horror” movies. Some of these movies are good because you are surprised at what they did with the technology available, some are good because they are just good movies that entertain you or may have actors that you have enjoyed in other movies & others in this genre are good because they are so bad. This one doesn’t really fit any of those categories.
Above average horror cheese. Over the top acting by the lead. Damsel in distress. Long winded fantastical scientific explanations that are easily accepted. A bad idea guy. Bet you can guess who dies first. Pretty decent looking “Shrews”. This might actually be an 8. Fun watch if you’re in the mood.
I’ve watched hundreds of old movies from silent films on through the 60s and this is one of my favorites of any genre. I feel that I have been entertained every time that I see it, which is probably once every 3 or 4 years since I was a kid. Maybe it’s just nostalgia, but I don’t think so…I mean I was born almost 40 years after it was made and I don’t think I saw it until I was 30 something.
It’s a well done horror film from 1980 with a decent story. Besides the lead, the acting is a little subpar. The music score does its job of adding to the suspense, even though the outcome doesn’t live up to the build all the time. It probably wouldn’t hold up to most peoples wanting to be scared expectations and I could see where some people might be bored by it. I gave it a 7, but if I could give another 1/2, I would. I wouldn’t put it in the great category, but it’s worth a watch and I don’t feel like I wasted my time on it.